The experiences of victims in the mass gatherings: a phenomenological study

Q3 Health Professions Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-29 DOI:10.5603/demj.a2022.0030
H. Jafari, Mohammad Heidari, Majid Heidarijamebozorgi, M. Mohammadi
{"title":"The experiences of victims in the mass gatherings: a phenomenological study","authors":"H. Jafari, Mohammad Heidari, Majid Heidarijamebozorgi, M. Mohammadi","doi":"10.5603/demj.a2022.0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The mass gathering events are becoming a big source of concern among public health practitioners. These events can affect a population’s health in different ways. The study aimed to identify mechanisms associated with morbidity and mortality in mass gathering (MGs) events. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a qualitative study that was conducted under a phenomenological ap­ proach. The study population included 21 people who were hospitalized due to injuries in the mass gathe­ rings. Data collection was conducted through semi­structured and in­depth interviews. RESULTS: A total number of 21 interviews were conducted in this study. Participants included 17 males and four females. Thematic analysis was used to identify 21 different themes and the themes were classified into five main areas. These five areas include Individuals’ unpreparedness, unprepared relief organizations, lack of proper response plans, and risky behavior and psychological reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The lived experiences of MGs victims showed that they need to be better educated at the community level about the potential MGs’ health risks. One of the most effective measures to reduce mor ­ tality in the MGs is risk governance. Risk governance must be a national policy and priority at the time of holding large gatherings.","PeriodicalId":52339,"journal":{"name":"Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/demj.a2022.0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The mass gathering events are becoming a big source of concern among public health practitioners. These events can affect a population’s health in different ways. The study aimed to identify mechanisms associated with morbidity and mortality in mass gathering (MGs) events. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a qualitative study that was conducted under a phenomenological ap­ proach. The study population included 21 people who were hospitalized due to injuries in the mass gathe­ rings. Data collection was conducted through semi­structured and in­depth interviews. RESULTS: A total number of 21 interviews were conducted in this study. Participants included 17 males and four females. Thematic analysis was used to identify 21 different themes and the themes were classified into five main areas. These five areas include Individuals’ unpreparedness, unprepared relief organizations, lack of proper response plans, and risky behavior and psychological reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The lived experiences of MGs victims showed that they need to be better educated at the community level about the potential MGs’ health risks. One of the most effective measures to reduce mor ­ tality in the MGs is risk governance. Risk governance must be a national policy and priority at the time of holding large gatherings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大规模集会中受害者的经历:一项现象学研究
导言:大规模聚集事件正在成为公共卫生从业人员关注的一个大问题。这些事件可以以不同的方式影响人口的健康。该研究旨在确定与群体聚集(mg)事件中发病率和死亡率相关的机制。材料和方法:这是一项采用现象学方法进行的定性研究。研究对象包括21名因在群众集会中受伤而住院的人。数据收集通过半结构化和深度访谈进行。结果:本研究共进行了21次访谈。参与者包括17名男性和4名女性。通过主题分析,确定了21个不同的主题,并将主题分为五个主要领域。这五个方面包括个人准备不足、救援组织准备不足、缺乏适当的应对计划、冒险行为和心理反应。结论:MGs受害者的生活经历表明,他们需要在社区一级更好地了解MGs潜在的健康风险。降低风险的最有效措施之一是风险治理。在举办大型聚会时,风险治理必须成为一项国家政策和优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal
Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Navigating mortality prediction in severe malaria: risk stratification models from the emergency department of coastal India Evaluating the risk: Group A Streptococcus as a causative agent of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome and necrotizing fasciitis Reassessment of the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the neurological disorders linked to long-term COVID-19 Use of tourniquets for hemorrhage control in civilian and military prehospital settings: metabolic, hemodynamic, and anatomical complications derived from exposure time Ethical predictability of human resources in Iranian hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1