Introduction to the Special Collection

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Case Studies in the Environment Pub Date : 2021-02-05 DOI:10.1525/CSE.2021.1245648
K. Miller, Anita Milman, M. Kiparsky
{"title":"Introduction to the Special Collection","authors":"K. Miller, Anita Milman, M. Kiparsky","doi":"10.1525/CSE.2021.1245648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unsustainable management of groundwater basins has led to groundwater depletion, with impacts to human and environmental systems that will be exacerbated by the hydrologic effects of climate change. Increasing inflows to groundwater basins through managed aquifer recharge (MAR) is a mechanism that can help bring aquifers into sustainable balance, yet in spite of significant physical potential, MAR remains underused. Increasing emphasis on the technical aspects of MAR has served to improve knowledge of the science needed to implement MAR. However, water managers often express anecdotally that institutional elements are equally important determinants, challenges, and potential drivers of MAR. In this special collection, we examine the institutional elements that enable, or gate progress on, MAR by presenting and comparing examples of successful MAR implementation from around the United States. The case studies depict the deep connection between water management objectives of MAR and institutional contexts and design. The motivations for MAR in these case studies fall into four broad categories: water supply risk management, groundwater banking, addressing interconnected groundwater and surface water, and recharge for broader aquifer or environmental benefits. In each case study, these water management objectives help determine key managerial and administrative issues that need to be addressed and accordingly the institutional shape of a MAR project. Ultimately, empirical efforts such as this special section may help demystify this process and enable more rapid adoption and diffusion of MAR.","PeriodicalId":42507,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in the Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/CSE.2021.1245648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Unsustainable management of groundwater basins has led to groundwater depletion, with impacts to human and environmental systems that will be exacerbated by the hydrologic effects of climate change. Increasing inflows to groundwater basins through managed aquifer recharge (MAR) is a mechanism that can help bring aquifers into sustainable balance, yet in spite of significant physical potential, MAR remains underused. Increasing emphasis on the technical aspects of MAR has served to improve knowledge of the science needed to implement MAR. However, water managers often express anecdotally that institutional elements are equally important determinants, challenges, and potential drivers of MAR. In this special collection, we examine the institutional elements that enable, or gate progress on, MAR by presenting and comparing examples of successful MAR implementation from around the United States. The case studies depict the deep connection between water management objectives of MAR and institutional contexts and design. The motivations for MAR in these case studies fall into four broad categories: water supply risk management, groundwater banking, addressing interconnected groundwater and surface water, and recharge for broader aquifer or environmental benefits. In each case study, these water management objectives help determine key managerial and administrative issues that need to be addressed and accordingly the institutional shape of a MAR project. Ultimately, empirical efforts such as this special section may help demystify this process and enable more rapid adoption and diffusion of MAR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特别收藏简介
地下水盆地的不可持续管理导致地下水枯竭,气候变化的水文影响将加剧对人类和环境系统的影响。通过有管理的含水层补给(MAR)增加地下水盆地的流入量是一种有助于使含水层达到可持续平衡的机制,但尽管有巨大的物理潜力,MAR仍未得到充分利用。对MAR技术方面的日益重视有助于提高实施MAR所需的科学知识。然而,水资源管理者经常表示,制度因素是MAR同样重要的决定因素、挑战和潜在驱动因素,MAR,通过介绍和比较美国各地成功实施MAR的例子。案例研究描述了MAR的水管理目标与制度背景和设计之间的深刻联系。在这些案例研究中,MAR的动机分为四大类:供水风险管理、地下水库、解决地下水和地表水之间的相互联系,以及为更广泛的含水层或环境效益进行补给。在每一个案例研究中,这些水管理目标都有助于确定需要解决的关键管理和行政问题,从而确定MAR项目的体制形式。最终,像这一特别部分这样的经验努力可能有助于揭开这一过程的神秘面纱,并使MAR能够更快地被采用和传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Legacies Matter: Exploring Social Acceptance of Pumped Storage Hydro in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula Governing Transition: Case Studies in Transformative Adaptation Understanding Facilitators and Barriers to Success: Framework for Developing Community Forestry Case Studies The Bronx River and Environmental Justice Through the Lens of a Watershed Barriers and Facilitators for Successful Community Forestry: Lessons Learned and Practical Applications From Case Studies in India and Guatemala
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1