Assessment of the Accuracy and Inter-Unit Agreement of Ultra-Wide Band to Compute Team Positioning in a Basketball Court

Q3 Health Professions Open Sports Sciences Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-11 DOI:10.2174/1875399x-v14-e210111-2020-16
Markel Rico-González, A. L. Arcos, Daniel Rojas-Valverde, J. Pino-Ortega
{"title":"Assessment of the Accuracy and Inter-Unit Agreement of Ultra-Wide Band to Compute Team Positioning in a Basketball Court","authors":"Markel Rico-González, A. L. Arcos, Daniel Rojas-Valverde, J. Pino-Ortega","doi":"10.2174/1875399x-v14-e210111-2020-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Local positioning systems have shown high accuracy for measuring the distance covered and the mean velocities and also for time-motion analysis. However, no study has assessed the accuracy and inter-unit agreement of local positioning system [LPS] technology to compute any collective tactical behavior variable.\n \n \n \n The main aim of the study was to analyze the accuracy of ultra-wideband and calculate inter-device agreement to compute the geometrical center coordinates (i.e., the relative positioning of each team represented in a single point computed considering x and y coordinates of the players).\n \n \n \n The inter-device geometrical center agreement of the devices when placed in the corners [static] of a basketball court was also assessed. The geometrical center (x, y coordinates) computed by a local positioning system tool, called an inertial measurement unit, was compared to the known geometrical center position in four different court areas: [1] 15x7 m, [2] 15x14 m [3] 15x21 m [4] 15x28 m. In each of the court areas, two different devices were placed on three tripods [60 cm from the floor] in three corners of the perimeter described. The distance of the device to the reference element was calculated every 0.5 s, providing a total of 600 samples. The absolute difference between the geometrical center measured on the ultra-wideband devices and the real geometrical center was less than 0-1.1%, with an absolute difference of 0 to 0.09 m in all the court areas.\n \n \n \n The difference between the devices when the geometrical center was computed was from 0.14 to 1.36%, with an absolute difference of 0.02 to 0.09 m. The accuracy of the ultra-wide band and inter-device agreement for computing the geometrical center was high (absolute error < 10 cm).\n \n \n \n These findings may suggest future validation protocols of the ultra-wide band for the assessment of collective tactical variables in team sports under a real match or training conditions.\n","PeriodicalId":38865,"journal":{"name":"Open Sports Sciences Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Sports Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1875399x-v14-e210111-2020-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Local positioning systems have shown high accuracy for measuring the distance covered and the mean velocities and also for time-motion analysis. However, no study has assessed the accuracy and inter-unit agreement of local positioning system [LPS] technology to compute any collective tactical behavior variable. The main aim of the study was to analyze the accuracy of ultra-wideband and calculate inter-device agreement to compute the geometrical center coordinates (i.e., the relative positioning of each team represented in a single point computed considering x and y coordinates of the players). The inter-device geometrical center agreement of the devices when placed in the corners [static] of a basketball court was also assessed. The geometrical center (x, y coordinates) computed by a local positioning system tool, called an inertial measurement unit, was compared to the known geometrical center position in four different court areas: [1] 15x7 m, [2] 15x14 m [3] 15x21 m [4] 15x28 m. In each of the court areas, two different devices were placed on three tripods [60 cm from the floor] in three corners of the perimeter described. The distance of the device to the reference element was calculated every 0.5 s, providing a total of 600 samples. The absolute difference between the geometrical center measured on the ultra-wideband devices and the real geometrical center was less than 0-1.1%, with an absolute difference of 0 to 0.09 m in all the court areas. The difference between the devices when the geometrical center was computed was from 0.14 to 1.36%, with an absolute difference of 0.02 to 0.09 m. The accuracy of the ultra-wide band and inter-device agreement for computing the geometrical center was high (absolute error < 10 cm). These findings may suggest future validation protocols of the ultra-wide band for the assessment of collective tactical variables in team sports under a real match or training conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
篮球场超宽带计算球队定位精度及单位间一致性评估
局部定位系统在测量覆盖距离和平均速度以及时间运动分析方面显示出很高的精度。然而,没有研究评估了局部定位系统[LPS]技术计算任何集体战术行为变量的准确性和单位间一致性。研究的主要目的是分析超宽带的精度,并计算设备间的协议,以计算几何中心坐标(即考虑球员的x和y坐标计算的单个点表示的每个球队的相对定位)。当设备放置在篮球场的角落[静态]时,还评估了设备之间的几何中心一致性。通过惯性测量单元的局部定位系统工具计算出的几何中心(x, y坐标)与四个不同场地的已知几何中心位置进行了比较:[1]15x7 m, [2] 15x14 m, [3] 15x21 m, bb0 15x28 m。在每个场地区域,两个不同的装置被放置在三个三脚架上(距离地面60厘米),位于周边的三个角落。每0.5 s计算一次装置到参考元件的距离,共提供600个样品。超宽带设备测得的几何中心与实际几何中心的绝对差值小于0-1.1%,所有球场区域的绝对差值为0 ~ 0.09 m。计算几何中心时,器件之间的误差为0.14 ~ 1.36%,绝对误差为0.02 ~ 0.09 m。计算几何中心的超宽带和器件间一致性精度高(绝对误差< 10 cm)。这些发现可能为未来在真实比赛或训练条件下团队运动集体战术变量评估的超宽带验证方案提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Sports Sciences Journal
Open Sports Sciences Journal Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Different Smoothing Window Lengths can Estimate the Neuromuscular Fatigue Threshold at The same Intensity of the Lactate Threshold During the Leg Press Exercise Different Smoothing Window Lengths can Estimate the Neuromuscular Fatigue Threshold at The same Intensity of the Lactate Threshold During the Leg Press Exercise Attitudes towards LGBTQ+ Inclusion in Canadian Figure Skating The Post-Exercise Lower Limbs Recovery Process: A Questionnaire Applied To Physiotherapists Inflammatory Indices During and After a Randomized Controlled Trial on Exercise in Old Adults: Could Moderate-Intensity Exercise Be Safe Enough? (Active Elderly and Health – Clinicaltrials.Gov, Nct03858114)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1