{"title":"From the Gothic Castle to the Romantic Haunted House: Disbelief, Conversion, Aporia, Abjection","authors":"Jerrold E. Hogle","doi":"10.1080/10509585.2023.2181427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We all acknowledge that the haunted house that saw an effulgence in Victorian English literature looks back to Horace Walpole’s The Castle of Otranto (1764), the first text to call itself A Gothic Story in its second edition (1765), and transplants its castle replete with fragmentary ghosts, recalling that these are haunted by Walpole’s prefaces to both editions that urge readers not to believe in the medieval supernatural that underwrites his tale’s apparitions. Yet the decades that intervene between eighteenth-century Gothic and later Victorian hauntings (what we still call the Romantic era) produce only occasional haunted houses, and what appears in this vein exhibits a struggle, rooted in Otranto, over which elements of the Walpolean Gothic to convert, reject, half-employ, or half-satirize. By analyzing examples from Charlotte Smith’s The Old Manor House and Coleridge’s “Frost at Midnight” to Walter Scott’s The Antiquary and Byron’s Don Juan, this article shows that such insecurity in the Romantic haunted-house motif epitomizes the fundamental relationship of the Gothic to the Romantic. Here Gothicized houses become microcosms for abjecting the unresolved tugs-of-war among conflicting but pervasive ideologies over and against which Romantic writing strives to build its imaginative, and even its ironical, resolutions.","PeriodicalId":43566,"journal":{"name":"European Romantic Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"133 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Romantic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509585.2023.2181427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT We all acknowledge that the haunted house that saw an effulgence in Victorian English literature looks back to Horace Walpole’s The Castle of Otranto (1764), the first text to call itself A Gothic Story in its second edition (1765), and transplants its castle replete with fragmentary ghosts, recalling that these are haunted by Walpole’s prefaces to both editions that urge readers not to believe in the medieval supernatural that underwrites his tale’s apparitions. Yet the decades that intervene between eighteenth-century Gothic and later Victorian hauntings (what we still call the Romantic era) produce only occasional haunted houses, and what appears in this vein exhibits a struggle, rooted in Otranto, over which elements of the Walpolean Gothic to convert, reject, half-employ, or half-satirize. By analyzing examples from Charlotte Smith’s The Old Manor House and Coleridge’s “Frost at Midnight” to Walter Scott’s The Antiquary and Byron’s Don Juan, this article shows that such insecurity in the Romantic haunted-house motif epitomizes the fundamental relationship of the Gothic to the Romantic. Here Gothicized houses become microcosms for abjecting the unresolved tugs-of-war among conflicting but pervasive ideologies over and against which Romantic writing strives to build its imaginative, and even its ironical, resolutions.
摘要我们都知道,在维多利亚时代的英国文学中,鬼屋曾是一座辉煌的建筑,它追溯到霍勒斯·沃波尔(Horace Walpole)的《奥特兰托城堡》(the Castle of Otranto,1764),这是第一部在第二版(1765)中称自己为哥特式故事的文本,并移植了充满零碎鬼魂的城堡,回忆起沃尔波尔在这两个版本的序言中都萦绕着这些故事,这些序言敦促读者不要相信中世纪的超自然现象,而这正是沃尔波尔故事的幽灵。然而,在18世纪哥特式和后来的维多利亚时代(我们仍然称之为浪漫主义时代)之间的几十年里,只偶尔会出现鬼屋,而以这种方式出现的东西则表现出一场植根于奥特兰托的斗争,在这场斗争中,沃尔波式哥特式的哪些元素可以被转换、拒绝、半采用或半讽刺。本文通过对夏洛特·史密斯的《老庄园》、柯勒律治的《午夜霜冻》、沃尔特·斯科特的《古董》和拜伦的《唐璜》等作品的分析,表明浪漫主义鬼屋主题中的这种不安全感集中体现了哥特式与浪漫主义的根本关系。在这里,哥特化的房子成为了摒弃冲突但普遍存在的意识形态之间悬而未决的战争的缩影,浪漫主义写作努力建立其富有想象力甚至讽刺性的决心。
期刊介绍:
The European Romantic Review publishes innovative scholarship on the literature and culture of Europe, Great Britain and the Americas during the period 1760-1840. Topics range from the scientific and psychological interests of German and English authors through the political and social reverberations of the French Revolution to the philosophical and ecological implications of Anglo-American nature writing. Selected papers from the annual conference of the North American Society for the Study of Romanticism appear in one of the five issues published each year.