ORM-CARMA Virtual Feature Topics for Advanced Reviewer Development

IF 8.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Organizational Research Methods Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1177/10944281211030648
L. J. Williams, G. Banks, R. Vandenberg
{"title":"ORM-CARMA Virtual Feature Topics for Advanced Reviewer Development","authors":"L. J. Williams, G. Banks, R. Vandenberg","doi":"10.1177/10944281211030648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Providing developmental peer reviewers is one of the most critical services performed by researchers in the organizational sciences (Bedeian, 2003). Yet, completing helpful and constructive reviews is not easy (Epstein, 1995; Feldman, 2005). This challenge may be due, in part, to the fact that our field provides only limited formal reviewer training in graduate programs and through professional development workshops (PDWs). Much of what new reviewers learn happens through informal training with mentors (Carpenter, 2009). Without effective training, reviewers may be prone to biases in their methodological evaluations of manuscripts (Banks et al., 2016; Bedeian, Taylor, & Miller, 2010; Emerson et al., 2010) or may simply lack the expertise needed to evaluate manuscripts due to the large variety of content areas and methodological techniques being employed in research. Many editorials have been written to provide guidance for basic reviewer development (e.g., Lee, 1995). Recently, the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP) and the Consortium for the Advancement of Research Methods and Analysis (CARMA) started an initiative around basic reviewer development (http://carmarmep.org/siop-carma-reviewer-series/). This ongoing training serves to introduce basic reviewer competencies (Koehler et al., 2020), recommend readings, and training videos that are freely available to help new and even experienced reviewers improve the quality of their reviews. While basic reviewer development is laudable, there is also a need for more formal training on advanced methodological topics. Hence, Organizational Research Methods along with CARMA are now introducing a new Virtual Feature Topic targeted at advanced reviewer development.","PeriodicalId":19689,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Research Methods","volume":"24 1","pages":"675 - 677"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211030648","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Providing developmental peer reviewers is one of the most critical services performed by researchers in the organizational sciences (Bedeian, 2003). Yet, completing helpful and constructive reviews is not easy (Epstein, 1995; Feldman, 2005). This challenge may be due, in part, to the fact that our field provides only limited formal reviewer training in graduate programs and through professional development workshops (PDWs). Much of what new reviewers learn happens through informal training with mentors (Carpenter, 2009). Without effective training, reviewers may be prone to biases in their methodological evaluations of manuscripts (Banks et al., 2016; Bedeian, Taylor, & Miller, 2010; Emerson et al., 2010) or may simply lack the expertise needed to evaluate manuscripts due to the large variety of content areas and methodological techniques being employed in research. Many editorials have been written to provide guidance for basic reviewer development (e.g., Lee, 1995). Recently, the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP) and the Consortium for the Advancement of Research Methods and Analysis (CARMA) started an initiative around basic reviewer development (http://carmarmep.org/siop-carma-reviewer-series/). This ongoing training serves to introduce basic reviewer competencies (Koehler et al., 2020), recommend readings, and training videos that are freely available to help new and even experienced reviewers improve the quality of their reviews. While basic reviewer development is laudable, there is also a need for more formal training on advanced methodological topics. Hence, Organizational Research Methods along with CARMA are now introducing a new Virtual Feature Topic targeted at advanced reviewer development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于高级评审员开发的ORM-CARMA虚拟功能主题
提供发展同行评审是组织科学研究人员提供的最关键的服务之一(Bedeian,2003)。然而,完成有益和建设性的评论并不容易(Epstein,1995;Feldman,2005)。这一挑战可能部分是由于我们的领域在研究生项目和专业发展研讨会(PDW)中只提供有限的正式评审员培训。新评审员学到的很多东西都是通过与导师的非正式培训获得的(Carpenter,2009)。如果没有有效的培训,审稿人在对手稿的方法论评估中可能容易产生偏见(Banks等人,2016;Bedeian,Taylor,&Miller,2010;Emerson等人,2010),或者由于研究中使用的内容领域和方法论技术种类繁多,可能根本缺乏评估手稿所需的专业知识。许多社论都是为基本评论家的发展提供指导而写的(例如,Lee,1995)。最近,工业与组织心理学学会(SIOP)和研究方法与分析促进会(CARMA)围绕基本评审员的发展发起了一项倡议(http://carmarmep.org/siop-carma-reviewer-series/)。这项正在进行的培训旨在介绍基本的评审员能力(Koehler等人,2020),推荐阅读材料,以及免费提供的培训视频,以帮助新的甚至有经验的评审员提高评审质量。虽然基本的评审员发展值得称赞,但也需要对高级方法论主题进行更正式的培训。因此,组织研究方法和CARMA现在引入了一个新的虚拟特征主题,旨在开发高级评审员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
23.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Organizational Research Methods (ORM) was founded with the aim of introducing pertinent methodological advancements to researchers in organizational sciences. The objective of ORM is to promote the application of current and emerging methodologies to advance both theory and research practices. Articles are expected to be comprehensible to readers with a background consistent with the methodological and statistical training provided in contemporary organizational sciences doctoral programs. The text should be presented in a manner that facilitates accessibility. For instance, highly technical content should be placed in appendices, and authors are encouraged to include example data and computer code when relevant. Additionally, authors should explicitly outline how their contribution has the potential to advance organizational theory and research practice.
期刊最新文献
The Internet Never Forgets: A Four-Step Scraping Tutorial, Codebase, and Database for Longitudinal Organizational Website Data One Size Does Not Fit All: Unraveling Item Response Process Heterogeneity Using the Mixture Dominance-Unfolding Model (MixDUM) Taking It Easy: Off-the-Shelf Versus Fine-Tuned Supervised Modeling of Performance Appraisal Text Hello World! Building Computational Models to Represent Social and Organizational Theory The Effects of the Training Sample Size, Ground Truth Reliability, and NLP Method on Language-Based Automatic Interview Scores’ Psychometric Properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1