Acute effects of combined static stretching and electrical stimulation on joint range of motion and passive stiffness

IF 1.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Translational sports medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-19 DOI:10.1002/tsm2.227
Takamasa Mizuno
{"title":"Acute effects of combined static stretching and electrical stimulation on joint range of motion and passive stiffness","authors":"Takamasa Mizuno","doi":"10.1002/tsm2.227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine the acute effects of combined static stretching (SS) and electrical stimulation (ES) on joint range of motion (ROM) and passive muscle and tendon properties. Sixteen healthy men participated in two randomly ordered experimental trials, which comprised a combination of SS and ES (SS + ES), and SS alone. In the SS + ES trial, participants performed 5 minutes of calf stretching while receiving ES of the gastrocnemius medialis, whereas in the SS trial the participants performed calf stretching only. Maximal dorsiflexion angle, passive torque, and displacement of the muscle‐tendon junction were measured before and after intervention. The stiffness of the muscle and muscle‐tendon unit was calculated. Compared with the pre‐intervention values, there were significant increases in ankle ROM and passive torque at maximal dorsiflexion angle after both interventions. In addition, the passive torque at the submaximal dorsiflexion angle and stiffness of the muscle‐tendon unit were significantly decreased after both interventions. However, none of the assessed parameters significantly differed between the SS + ES and SS trials. These results show that 5 minutes of SS increases ankle ROM and changes the passive properties of the muscles. However, there is no additional effect of adding ES to SS.","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"378 - 385"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/tsm2.227","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the acute effects of combined static stretching (SS) and electrical stimulation (ES) on joint range of motion (ROM) and passive muscle and tendon properties. Sixteen healthy men participated in two randomly ordered experimental trials, which comprised a combination of SS and ES (SS + ES), and SS alone. In the SS + ES trial, participants performed 5 minutes of calf stretching while receiving ES of the gastrocnemius medialis, whereas in the SS trial the participants performed calf stretching only. Maximal dorsiflexion angle, passive torque, and displacement of the muscle‐tendon junction were measured before and after intervention. The stiffness of the muscle and muscle‐tendon unit was calculated. Compared with the pre‐intervention values, there were significant increases in ankle ROM and passive torque at maximal dorsiflexion angle after both interventions. In addition, the passive torque at the submaximal dorsiflexion angle and stiffness of the muscle‐tendon unit were significantly decreased after both interventions. However, none of the assessed parameters significantly differed between the SS + ES and SS trials. These results show that 5 minutes of SS increases ankle ROM and changes the passive properties of the muscles. However, there is no additional effect of adding ES to SS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静态拉伸和电刺激联合对关节活动范围和被动僵硬的急性影响
本研究旨在确定静态拉伸(SS)和电刺激(ES)联合对关节运动范围(ROM)和被动肌肉和肌腱特性的急性影响。16名健康男性参与了两项随机排序的实验试验,其中包括SS和ES的组合(SS+ES),以及单独的SS。在SS+ES试验中,参与者在接受腓肠肌内侧肌ES的同时进行了5分钟的小腿拉伸,而在SS试验中,他们只进行了小腿拉伸。在干预前后测量最大背屈角、被动扭矩和肌腱连接处的位移。计算肌肉和肌腱单元的刚度。与干预前的值相比,两种干预后最大背屈角下的踝关节ROM和被动扭矩均显著增加。此外,两种干预措施后,次最大背屈角处的被动扭矩和肌腱单元的硬度均显著降低。然而,在SS+ES和SS试验之间,评估的参数没有显著差异。这些结果表明,5分钟的SS增加了脚踝ROM,并改变了肌肉的被动特性。然而,在SS中添加ES并没有额外的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sex Differences in Participation and Performance Trends in Time-Limited Ultramarathon Events. Positional Differences in Jump Loads and Force and Velocity Metrics Throughout a 16-Week Division I Volleyball Season. Fat-Free Mass Is Positively Associated With Urine Specific Gravity in Athletes and Active Adults: A Quantitative Review. 'Every Run Is Hard': Endurance Athletes' Experiences of Return to Sports Participation After COVID-19-A Mixed Methods Study. Field Surface Type and Season-Ending Lower Extremity Injury in NFL Players.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1