An education intervention care bundle to improve hospitalised patients’ pressure injury prevention knowledge: a before and after study

IF 0.6 Q4 DERMATOLOGY Wound Practice and Research Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.33235/wpr.28.4.154-162
Jodie Deakin, B. Gillespie, W. Chaboyer, Paul Nieuwenhoven, S. Latimer
{"title":"An education intervention care bundle to improve hospitalised patients’ pressure injury prevention knowledge: a before and after study","authors":"Jodie Deakin, B. Gillespie, W. Chaboyer, Paul Nieuwenhoven, S. Latimer","doi":"10.33235/wpr.28.4.154-162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To measure the relationship between patient participation in pressure injury prevention (PIP) both before and after implementing a patient-centred pressure injury prevention care bundle (PPIPCB). Methods This before and after intervention study used surveys to measure adult medical patients' participation in their PIP care and satisfaction with the PPIPCB across three medical inpatient units in an Australian tertiary hospital. Descriptive statistics described the sample and patient intervention satisfaction. A paired samples t-test measured changes in the before and after survey scale scores. Results Eighty patients, with an average age of 67.2 years (SD=18.3), were recruited during November and December 2019. There were statistically significant increases in total mean scores for the patient participation in pressure injury prevention (PPPIP) scale after the intervention (before: mean=18.6, SD=2.8; after: mean=22.5, SD=1.9). Significant improvements in patients' self-reported knowledge of pressure injury (PI) risk and perceived levels of participation in their PI care were reported after receiving the intervention. A total of 98.8% of participants agree or strongly agree that they were satisfied with the intervention as delivered. Conclusion Engaging patients is one way to increase their participation in PIP. Wider clinical adoption appears warranted, with nurses the key to the successful implementation.","PeriodicalId":44572,"journal":{"name":"Wound Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33235/wpr.28.4.154-162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Aim To measure the relationship between patient participation in pressure injury prevention (PIP) both before and after implementing a patient-centred pressure injury prevention care bundle (PPIPCB). Methods This before and after intervention study used surveys to measure adult medical patients' participation in their PIP care and satisfaction with the PPIPCB across three medical inpatient units in an Australian tertiary hospital. Descriptive statistics described the sample and patient intervention satisfaction. A paired samples t-test measured changes in the before and after survey scale scores. Results Eighty patients, with an average age of 67.2 years (SD=18.3), were recruited during November and December 2019. There were statistically significant increases in total mean scores for the patient participation in pressure injury prevention (PPPIP) scale after the intervention (before: mean=18.6, SD=2.8; after: mean=22.5, SD=1.9). Significant improvements in patients' self-reported knowledge of pressure injury (PI) risk and perceived levels of participation in their PI care were reported after receiving the intervention. A total of 98.8% of participants agree or strongly agree that they were satisfied with the intervention as delivered. Conclusion Engaging patients is one way to increase their participation in PIP. Wider clinical adoption appears warranted, with nurses the key to the successful implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育干预护理包提高住院患者压力损伤预防知识的前后对照研究
目的测量实施以患者为中心的压力损伤预防护理包(PPIPCB)前后患者参与压力损伤预防(PIP)之间的关系。方法这项干预前后的研究使用调查来衡量澳大利亚一家三级医院三个医疗住院单元的成年医疗患者对PIP护理的参与程度和对PPIPCB的满意度。描述性统计描述了样本和患者干预满意度。配对样本t检验测量了调查前后量表得分的变化。结果在2019年11月和12月招募了80名患者,平均年龄67.2岁(SD=18.3)。干预后,患者参与压力损伤预防(PPPIP)量表的总平均分在统计学上显著增加(干预前:平均值=18.6,SD=2.8;干预后:平均值=22.5,SD=1.9)干涉共有98.8%的参与者同意或强烈同意他们对所提供的干预感到满意。结论让患者参与是提高他们参与PIP的一种方式。更广泛的临床应用似乎是有必要的,护士是成功实施的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Required wound care content for nursing curricula in Australia: a Delphi study Characteristics of United States nursing homes with high percentages of stage 2–4 pressure injuries among high-risk nursing home residents with obesity Investigating cognition in people with diabetes-related foot ulcers: a study protocol The impact of venous leg ulcers on quality of life Aged care and education - critical topics in wound management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1