Trade liberalization and productivity of Indian manufacturing firms

IF 0.8 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Indian Growth and Development Review Pub Date : 2019-06-12 DOI:10.1108/IGDR-10-2018-0108
B. Goldar, Ishan Chawla, S. Behera
{"title":"Trade liberalization and productivity of Indian manufacturing firms","authors":"B. Goldar, Ishan Chawla, S. Behera","doi":"10.1108/IGDR-10-2018-0108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of India’s trade liberalization during the late 1990s and 2000s on productivity of manufacturing firms and verify whether the productivity-enhancing impact of reductions in input tariffs was greater than that of output tariff cuts, as found in some earlier studies.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nFirm-level (company-level) data drawn from Prowess database are used for the estimation of total factor productivity (TFP) at the firm level, done by using the Levinsohn–Petrin methodology. Econometric models are estimated to explain firm-level TFP. The explanatory variables used are output and input tariff rates and quantitative restrictions on imports at the industry level and firm characteristics such as firm size, export intensity and import intensity. Firm-level panel data for 2002-2010 or for a longer period 1998-2010 are used for the estimation of econometric models. Model estimation is done by applying the fixed-effects model and IV-2SLS, 3SLS estimators and EC2SLS estimators.\n\n\nFindings\nTrade liberalization had a significant positive effect on the productivity of Indian manufacturing firms. The lowering of output tariff had a greater beneficial impact on TFP of Indian manufacturing firms than the lowering of tariff on intermediate inputs.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nGood deal of care has been taken in the measurement of output and inputs for the purpose of TFP measurement. Two alternative frameworks, gross output and value added, are used. This helps in making a better estimate of the impact of trade liberalization on TFP.\n","PeriodicalId":42861,"journal":{"name":"Indian Growth and Development Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IGDR-10-2018-0108","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Growth and Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IGDR-10-2018-0108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of India’s trade liberalization during the late 1990s and 2000s on productivity of manufacturing firms and verify whether the productivity-enhancing impact of reductions in input tariffs was greater than that of output tariff cuts, as found in some earlier studies. Design/methodology/approach Firm-level (company-level) data drawn from Prowess database are used for the estimation of total factor productivity (TFP) at the firm level, done by using the Levinsohn–Petrin methodology. Econometric models are estimated to explain firm-level TFP. The explanatory variables used are output and input tariff rates and quantitative restrictions on imports at the industry level and firm characteristics such as firm size, export intensity and import intensity. Firm-level panel data for 2002-2010 or for a longer period 1998-2010 are used for the estimation of econometric models. Model estimation is done by applying the fixed-effects model and IV-2SLS, 3SLS estimators and EC2SLS estimators. Findings Trade liberalization had a significant positive effect on the productivity of Indian manufacturing firms. The lowering of output tariff had a greater beneficial impact on TFP of Indian manufacturing firms than the lowering of tariff on intermediate inputs. Originality/value Good deal of care has been taken in the measurement of output and inputs for the purpose of TFP measurement. Two alternative frameworks, gross output and value added, are used. This helps in making a better estimate of the impact of trade liberalization on TFP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贸易自由化与印度制造业企业的生产率
目的本文的目的是评估印度在20世纪90年代末和21世纪初的贸易自由化对制造业企业生产力的影响,并验证投入关税削减对生产力的提高影响是否大于产出关税削减的影响,正如一些早期研究所发现的那样。设计/方法论/方法从Prowess数据库中提取的公司层面(公司层面)数据用于通过使用Levinsohn–Petrin方法来估计公司层面的全要素生产率(TFP)。估计计量经济学模型可以解释企业层面的全要素生产率。所使用的解释变量是产出和投入关税税率、行业层面的进口数量限制以及企业规模、出口强度和进口强度等企业特征。2002-2010年或1998-2010年更长时期的企业层面面板数据用于计量经济模型的估计。通过应用固定效应模型和IV-2SLS、3SLS估计量和EC2SLS估计量进行模型估计。发现贸易自由化对印度制造业企业的生产力产生了显著的积极影响。与降低中间投入品关税相比,降低产出关税对印度制造业企业全要素生产率的有利影响更大。独创性/价值在衡量TFP的产出和投入时非常谨慎。使用了两个备选框架,即总产出和增加值。这有助于更好地估计贸易自由化对全要素生产率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Resilience of the group lending model to a COVID-19 induced shock: evidence from an Indian microfinance fund Sociodemographic and institutional factors as determinants of access to food among rural households during COVID-19 pandemic in India Structural transformation of the Indian states: heterogeneity among them in a ten-sector economy Are we measuring the SDGs progress right? Evidence and insights from a review of India’s SDG index What explains exit in Indian manufacturing industries?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1