Adaptation and validity evidence of the Dimensions of Secularity (DoS) Scale for the Brazilian population

IF 1.3 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Mental Health Religion & Culture Pub Date : 2022-03-29 DOI:10.1080/13674676.2021.2013788
Camila Chagas, Miriam Raquel Wachholz Strelhow, Wellington Zangari, José Carlos Fernandes Galduróz
{"title":"Adaptation and validity evidence of the Dimensions of Secularity (DoS) Scale for the Brazilian population","authors":"Camila Chagas, Miriam Raquel Wachholz Strelhow, Wellington Zangari, José Carlos Fernandes Galduróz","doi":"10.1080/13674676.2021.2013788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study presents the process of the translation, adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the Dimensions of Secularity (DoS) Scale for use in Brazil. This will enable the inclusion of measures on secularity in future Brazilian studies. The psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the scale were verified in a sample of 952 participants. The data obtained show that the scale presented good psychometric functioning indexes and adequate internal consistency indexes for the five-factor, 22-item model. Correlations of the DoS Scale with other constructs were also evaluated to seek evidence of discriminant and convergent validity. The Brazilian version of the DoS Scale is a measure that can be used to assess the degrees of atheism and agnosticism and the philosophical dimensions of secularity.","PeriodicalId":47614,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Religion & Culture","volume":"26 1","pages":"361 - 374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Religion & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2021.2013788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study presents the process of the translation, adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the Dimensions of Secularity (DoS) Scale for use in Brazil. This will enable the inclusion of measures on secularity in future Brazilian studies. The psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the scale were verified in a sample of 952 participants. The data obtained show that the scale presented good psychometric functioning indexes and adequate internal consistency indexes for the five-factor, 22-item model. Correlations of the DoS Scale with other constructs were also evaluated to seek evidence of discriminant and convergent validity. The Brazilian version of the DoS Scale is a measure that can be used to assess the degrees of atheism and agnosticism and the philosophical dimensions of secularity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西人群世俗维度量表的适应性和有效性证据
摘要本研究介绍了在巴西使用的世俗维度量表的翻译、改编和心理测量评估过程。这将有助于在未来的巴西研究中纳入关于世俗性的措施。巴西版量表的心理测量特性在952名参与者的样本中得到了验证。数据表明,该量表对五因素22项模型具有良好的心理测量功能指标和足够的内部一致性指标。DoS量表与其他结构的相关性也被评估,以寻求判别和收敛有效性的证据。巴西版的DoS量表可用于评估无神论和不可知论的程度以及世俗性的哲学维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Exploring the factor structure of the adolescent form of the Francis Psychological Type and Emotional Temperament Scales (FPTETSA) among Canadian Baptist youth: full form and short form Mindfulness and mystical experiences in Sufis and non-Sufis Validity and reliability of the Arabic Fear of COVID-19 Scale in Lebanese people during the pandemic Strengthening spiritual and cultural approaches in managing mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic The development and validation of the COVID-19 Depression Scale (COVID-19DS): association with the Perceived Health-Related Components Scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1