The new research assessment reform in China and its implementation

Q1 Social Sciences Scholarly Assessment Reports Pub Date : 2020-04-29 DOI:10.31235/osf.io/9mqzd
Lin Zhang, G. Sivertsen
{"title":"The new research assessment reform in China and its implementation","authors":"Lin Zhang, G. Sivertsen","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/9mqzd","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A radical reform of research assessment was recently launched in China. It seeks to replace a focus on Web of Science-based indicators with a balanced combination of qualitative and quantitative research evaluation, and to strengthen the local relevance of research in China. It trusts the institutions to implement the policy within a few months but does not provide the necessary national platforms for coordination, influence and collaboration on developing shared tools and information resources and for agreement on definitions, criteria and protocols for the procedures. Based on international experiences, this article provides constructive ideas for the implementation of the new policy.","PeriodicalId":52687,"journal":{"name":"Scholarly Assessment Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholarly Assessment Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/9mqzd","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

A radical reform of research assessment was recently launched in China. It seeks to replace a focus on Web of Science-based indicators with a balanced combination of qualitative and quantitative research evaluation, and to strengthen the local relevance of research in China. It trusts the institutions to implement the policy within a few months but does not provide the necessary national platforms for coordination, influence and collaboration on developing shared tools and information resources and for agreement on definitions, criteria and protocols for the procedures. Based on international experiences, this article provides constructive ideas for the implementation of the new policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国新的科研考核改革及其实施
中国最近启动了一项彻底的研究评估改革。它试图用定性和定量研究评估的平衡结合来取代对基于科学网络的指标的关注,并加强中国研究的地方相关性。它相信各机构能够在几个月内实施该政策,但没有提供必要的国家平台,以便在开发共享工具和信息资源方面进行协调、影响和合作,并就程序的定义、标准和议定书达成一致。本文在借鉴国际经验的基础上,为新政策的实施提供了建设性的思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scholarly Assessment Reports
Scholarly Assessment Reports Social Sciences-Communication
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Research Performance Assessment Issues: The Case of Kazakhstan Using Conventional Bibliographic Databases for Social Science Research: Web of Science and Scopus are not the Only Options Developing a Method for Evaluating Global University Rankings Assessing the Impact and Quality of Research Data Using Altmetrics and Other Indicators Quantification – Affordances and Limits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1