Katie A. Wilson, N. Yussouf, P. Skinner, K. Knopfmeier, B. Matilla, P. Heinselman, Andrew Orrison, Richard Otto, Michael Erickson
{"title":"The NOAA Weather Prediction Center’s Use and Evaluation of Experimental Warn-on-Forecast System Guidance","authors":"Katie A. Wilson, N. Yussouf, P. Skinner, K. Knopfmeier, B. Matilla, P. Heinselman, Andrew Orrison, Richard Otto, Michael Erickson","doi":"10.15191/nwajom.2023.1107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines use of experimental Warn-on-Forecast System (WoFS) guidance for short-term flash flood prediction at the NOAA Weather Prediction Center’s Meteorological Watch (Metwatch) desk. The WoFS guidance provides storm-scale ensemble forecasts for individual thunderstorms out to six hours and has previously shown great promise in its predictive skill for heavy rainfall events. Its operational utility was examined during 2019 and 2020 in a formal collaboration between Warn-on-Forecast scientists and Metwatch meteorologists. During that time, Metwatch meteorologists integrated real-time WoFS guidance into their Mesoscale Precipitation Discussion forecast processes and provided evaluations via a post-event survey. The survey queried impacts of WoFS guidance on their situational awareness, workload, and confidence, and Metwatch meteorologists also reported subjective assessments of model performance. Survey results highlighted the importance of viewing consistency in WoFS guidance across runs and agreement between WoFS guidance with conceptual models, other numerical weather prediction guidance, and observations. The use of WoFS tended to either maintain or slightly increase Metwatch meteorologists’ workload, while also increasing their confidence (notably for events perceived as better predicted). Of the different forecast attributes evaluated, Metwatch meteorologists reported convective mode as the attribute best predicted by WoFS. Use of WoFS guidance supported Mesoscale Precipitation Discussion decision making, including the placement and spatial extent of the product and the level of specificity provided about the related flash flood threat(s).","PeriodicalId":44039,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operational Meteorology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operational Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15191/nwajom.2023.1107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines use of experimental Warn-on-Forecast System (WoFS) guidance for short-term flash flood prediction at the NOAA Weather Prediction Center’s Meteorological Watch (Metwatch) desk. The WoFS guidance provides storm-scale ensemble forecasts for individual thunderstorms out to six hours and has previously shown great promise in its predictive skill for heavy rainfall events. Its operational utility was examined during 2019 and 2020 in a formal collaboration between Warn-on-Forecast scientists and Metwatch meteorologists. During that time, Metwatch meteorologists integrated real-time WoFS guidance into their Mesoscale Precipitation Discussion forecast processes and provided evaluations via a post-event survey. The survey queried impacts of WoFS guidance on their situational awareness, workload, and confidence, and Metwatch meteorologists also reported subjective assessments of model performance. Survey results highlighted the importance of viewing consistency in WoFS guidance across runs and agreement between WoFS guidance with conceptual models, other numerical weather prediction guidance, and observations. The use of WoFS tended to either maintain or slightly increase Metwatch meteorologists’ workload, while also increasing their confidence (notably for events perceived as better predicted). Of the different forecast attributes evaluated, Metwatch meteorologists reported convective mode as the attribute best predicted by WoFS. Use of WoFS guidance supported Mesoscale Precipitation Discussion decision making, including the placement and spatial extent of the product and the level of specificity provided about the related flash flood threat(s).
这项研究考察了NOAA天气预报中心气象观测台(Metwatch)对短期山洪预测的实验性预警系统(WoFS)指南的使用情况。WoFS指南为6小时内的个别雷暴提供了风暴级综合预报,此前在强降雨事件的预测技巧方面表现出了巨大的前景。在2019年和2020年期间,Warn on Forecast科学家和Metwatch气象学家的正式合作对其运行效用进行了检查。在此期间,Metwatch气象学家将实时WoFS指南纳入了他们的中尺度降水讨论预测过程,并通过事后调查提供了评估。该调查询问了WoFS指导对他们的态势感知、工作量和信心的影响,Metwatch气象学家也报告了对模型性能的主观评估。调查结果强调了WoFS指南在各次运行中观察一致性的重要性,以及WoFS指南与概念模型、其他数值天气预测指南和观测之间的一致性。WoFS的使用往往会维持或略微增加Metwatch气象学家的工作量,同时也会增加他们的信心(尤其是对于被认为预测更好的事件)。Metwatch气象学家报告称,在评估的不同预测属性中,对流模式是WoFS预测的最佳属性。WoFS指南的使用支持中尺度降水讨论决策,包括产品的位置和空间范围,以及相关山洪威胁的特异性水平。