Primary care physicians' knowledge, attitude and perception towards homosexuality in Singapore

Derek Lim, Seng Bin Ang
{"title":"Primary care physicians' knowledge, attitude and perception towards homosexuality in Singapore","authors":"Derek Lim,&nbsp;Seng Bin Ang","doi":"10.1016/j.glohj.2021.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study aim to gain insights into attitudes, acceptance and knowledge levels among family physicians toward homosexual people, which are important as they may affect care among this at-risk group.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An anonymized self-administered questionnaire in English was posted with the assistance of the College of Family Physicians Singapore in February 2015 to its 1 529 members with self-addressed, pre-stamped envelopes for replies. The questionnaire included demographic questions such as age group, gender, religion, ethnicity, marital status and place of practice. Questions and scales that measured attitude, acceptance, knowledge and perception of colleagues who are homosexual were also included in the questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>451 responses (29.5%) were obtained, of which 441 were valid (28.84%). About 52.8% of participants were found to have negative, 8.9% neutral and 38.3% positive attitudes toward homosexuality. Most (75.6%) were accepting of homosexuals, with 9.3% neutral and 15.1% not accepting. Knowledge levels were poor, with a mean score of 6.9 out of a maximum of 13. A strong correlation was found between the attitudes towards lesbians and gay men (ATLG) and acceptance of homosexuals scales (<em>r</em> = 0.69, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), with moderate correlations between acceptance and knowledge (<em>r</em> = 0.54, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and ATLG and Knowledge (<em>r</em> = 0.54, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite majority of family physicians having negative attitudes towards homosexuality, most are able to accept homosexuality. With better education in sexual orientation in the medical educational curriculum, the increase in knowledge will lead to better care for people with homosexuality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73164,"journal":{"name":"Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2414644721000889/pdfft?md5=b7b1ac6d5a8dd4e33a872bf953596159&pid=1-s2.0-S2414644721000889-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2414644721000889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aims

This study aim to gain insights into attitudes, acceptance and knowledge levels among family physicians toward homosexual people, which are important as they may affect care among this at-risk group.

Methods

An anonymized self-administered questionnaire in English was posted with the assistance of the College of Family Physicians Singapore in February 2015 to its 1 529 members with self-addressed, pre-stamped envelopes for replies. The questionnaire included demographic questions such as age group, gender, religion, ethnicity, marital status and place of practice. Questions and scales that measured attitude, acceptance, knowledge and perception of colleagues who are homosexual were also included in the questionnaire.

Results

451 responses (29.5%) were obtained, of which 441 were valid (28.84%). About 52.8% of participants were found to have negative, 8.9% neutral and 38.3% positive attitudes toward homosexuality. Most (75.6%) were accepting of homosexuals, with 9.3% neutral and 15.1% not accepting. Knowledge levels were poor, with a mean score of 6.9 out of a maximum of 13. A strong correlation was found between the attitudes towards lesbians and gay men (ATLG) and acceptance of homosexuals scales (r = 0.69, P < 0.001), with moderate correlations between acceptance and knowledge (r = 0.54, P < 0.001) and ATLG and Knowledge (r = 0.54, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Despite majority of family physicians having negative attitudes towards homosexuality, most are able to accept homosexuality. With better education in sexual orientation in the medical educational curriculum, the increase in knowledge will lead to better care for people with homosexuality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新加坡初级保健医生对同性恋的认识、态度和看法
目的本研究旨在了解家庭医生对同性恋者的态度、接受度和知识水平,这些因素很重要,因为它们可能会影响对这一高危群体的护理。方法于2015年2月,在新加坡家庭医生学院的协助下,将一份英文匿名自填问卷用回邮、贴好邮票的信封邮寄给其1529名成员。调查问卷包括人口统计问题,如年龄组、性别、宗教、种族、婚姻状况和行医地点。问卷中还包括对同事同性恋的态度、接受程度、知识和感知的问题和量表。结果共获得应答451份(29.5%),有效应答441份(28.84%)。52.8%的人对同性恋持否定态度,8.9%的人持中立态度,38.3%的人持积极态度。大多数人(75.6%)接受同性恋,9.3%的人持中立态度,15.1%的人不接受。知识水平较差,平均得分为6.9分(满分为13分)。对男女同性恋者的态度(ATLG)与对同性恋者的接受程度有很强的相关性(r = 0.69, P <0.001),接受度与知识之间存在中等相关性(r = 0.54, P <0.001)、ATLG和Knowledge (r = 0.54, P <0.001)。结论尽管大多数家庭医生对同性恋持否定态度,但大多数家庭医生能够接受同性恋。随着医学教育课程中性取向教育的加强,知识的增加将导致对同性恋者的更好照顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Building a transdisciplinary science of One Health with a global vision Mobile health interventions for improving maternal and child health outcomes in South Africa: a systematic review Plain language in the healthcare of Japan: a systematic review of “plain Japanese” Demographic and socioeconomic determinants of urinary arsenic concentration for elementary school children in Bangladesh Shared decision making in rural general practices: a qualitative exploration of older rural South Australians’ perceived involvement in clinical consultations with doctors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1