Modified Fe3O4 Magnetite Core@Shell Type Nanomaterials for Highly-Responsive LPG Sensing: A Comparative Analysis

Shakti Singh, A. Dzeranov, L. Bondarenko, K. Kydralieva, G. Dzhardimalieva, A. Babaytsev, G. Kugabaeva, N. Golubeva, B. Yadav
{"title":"Modified Fe3O4 Magnetite Core@Shell Type Nanomaterials for Highly-Responsive LPG Sensing: A Comparative Analysis","authors":"Shakti Singh, A. Dzeranov, L. Bondarenko, K. Kydralieva, G. Dzhardimalieva, A. Babaytsev, G. Kugabaeva, N. Golubeva, B. Yadav","doi":"10.1149/2754-2726/acc3ab","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work focuses on the synthesis of Fe3O4 magnetite core@shell type nanoparticles modified with three types of ligands: Magnetite with activated carbon (MAC), Magnetite with silica (tetraethoxysilane, TEOS, and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, APTES) (MTA) and Magnetite with silica, APTES and humic acids (MTAH). The MTAH sample shows greater porosity in comparison to MTA, and MAC samples. The band gap of MTAH is 4.08 eV, which is higher than MTA (2.92 eV), and MAC (2.80 eV). Rietveld quantitative phase analysis of all derivatives was performed and compared with all three samples. The LPG sensing at room temperature shows the highest sensor response of 9.42, in comparison to 3.87 sensor response for MAC, and 4.60 for MTA. This approximately double sensor response increment is justified with the help of band gap, porosity, and size of all 3 the samples. The MTAH sample shows the lowest response-recovery time of 9.33 and 10.78 s respectively in comparison to MAC and MTA samples. In conclusion, this manuscript describes the synthesis procedure of different derivatives of Fe3O4 core@shell materials along with the relation of LPG sensing with different parameters of the materials.","PeriodicalId":72870,"journal":{"name":"ECS sensors plus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECS sensors plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1149/2754-2726/acc3ab","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present work focuses on the synthesis of Fe3O4 magnetite core@shell type nanoparticles modified with three types of ligands: Magnetite with activated carbon (MAC), Magnetite with silica (tetraethoxysilane, TEOS, and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, APTES) (MTA) and Magnetite with silica, APTES and humic acids (MTAH). The MTAH sample shows greater porosity in comparison to MTA, and MAC samples. The band gap of MTAH is 4.08 eV, which is higher than MTA (2.92 eV), and MAC (2.80 eV). Rietveld quantitative phase analysis of all derivatives was performed and compared with all three samples. The LPG sensing at room temperature shows the highest sensor response of 9.42, in comparison to 3.87 sensor response for MAC, and 4.60 for MTA. This approximately double sensor response increment is justified with the help of band gap, porosity, and size of all 3 the samples. The MTAH sample shows the lowest response-recovery time of 9.33 and 10.78 s respectively in comparison to MAC and MTA samples. In conclusion, this manuscript describes the synthesis procedure of different derivatives of Fe3O4 core@shell materials along with the relation of LPG sensing with different parameters of the materials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于高响应LPG传感的改性Fe3O4磁铁矿Core@Shell型纳米材料的比较分析
本文主要研究了Fe3O4磁铁矿的合成core@shell用三种类型的配体修饰的类型纳米颗粒:磁铁矿与活性炭(MAC)、磁铁矿与二氧化硅(四乙氧基硅烷、TEOS和3-氨基丙基三乙氧基硅烷,APTES)(MTA)和磁铁矿与二氧化硅、APTES和腐殖酸(MTAH)。与MTA和MAC样品相比,MTAH样品显示出更大的孔隙率。MTAH的带隙为4.08eV,高于MTA(2.92eV)和MAC(2.80eV)。对所有衍生物进行了Rietveld定量相分析,并与所有三个样品进行了比较。室温下的LPG传感显示出9.42的最高传感器响应,相比之下,MAC和MTA的传感器响应分别为3.87和4.60。在所有3个样品的带隙、孔隙率和尺寸的帮助下,这种近似两倍的传感器响应增量是合理的。与MAC和MTA样本相比,MTAH样本显示出最低的响应恢复时间,分别为9.33和10.78秒。总之,本文描述了Fe3O4不同衍生物的合成过程core@shell以及LPG传感与不同材料参数的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review—Energy and Power Requirements for Wearable Sensors 3D Printed Carbon Nanotubes Reinforced Polydimethylsiloxane Flexible Sensors for Tactile Sensing Editors’ Choice—Review—Advances in Electrochemical Sensors: Improving Food Safety, Quality, and Traceability Field Testing of a Mixed Potential IoT Sensor Platform for Methane Quantification Automated Quantification of DNA Damage Using Deep Learning and Use of Synthetic Data Generated from Basic Geometric Shapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1