{"title":"Just the Usual Work: The Social Worlds of Ida Martin, Working-Class Diarist","authors":"Margaret A. Lowe","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2022.2148053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"would be familiar in New York or indeed Tokyo. Ross tells the story well. Illustrations help bring things alive, and the outlines of successive narratives emerge clearly. As a geographer, I would have liked some maps—of the street itself, with building footprints, and of its setting. A more serious limitation is that Ross makes little attempt to compare Yonge Street, and Toronto, with their Canadian and American counterparts. He knows, and cites, a wider literature, but the narrative remains local. Toronto was unusual. Using data reported by Jeffrey Patterson (1993), I estimate that between 1948 and 1973 Toronto spent only $7 per person of federal urban renewal funds, the lowest of any major Canadian city. Only Vancouver rivaled this; the figures for Montreal ($11), Ottawa ($34), Hamilton ($46), not to mention Saint John, New Brunswick ($180), were higher. Moreover, unlike Hamilton, for example, those funds were mostly spent on public housing projects away from the city’s core. These, and other, comparisons would have helped clarify the distinctiveness of Toronto’s experience. But it’s always easy to quibble. I’m thankful for what Ross has given us. Now, we need more historical studies of Canadian downtowns, and especially of ones like The Heart of Toronto, that are well-informed and solidly grounded in the particularities of an urban place.","PeriodicalId":43336,"journal":{"name":"American Review of Canadian Studies","volume":"52 1","pages":"505 - 506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Review of Canadian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2022.2148053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
would be familiar in New York or indeed Tokyo. Ross tells the story well. Illustrations help bring things alive, and the outlines of successive narratives emerge clearly. As a geographer, I would have liked some maps—of the street itself, with building footprints, and of its setting. A more serious limitation is that Ross makes little attempt to compare Yonge Street, and Toronto, with their Canadian and American counterparts. He knows, and cites, a wider literature, but the narrative remains local. Toronto was unusual. Using data reported by Jeffrey Patterson (1993), I estimate that between 1948 and 1973 Toronto spent only $7 per person of federal urban renewal funds, the lowest of any major Canadian city. Only Vancouver rivaled this; the figures for Montreal ($11), Ottawa ($34), Hamilton ($46), not to mention Saint John, New Brunswick ($180), were higher. Moreover, unlike Hamilton, for example, those funds were mostly spent on public housing projects away from the city’s core. These, and other, comparisons would have helped clarify the distinctiveness of Toronto’s experience. But it’s always easy to quibble. I’m thankful for what Ross has given us. Now, we need more historical studies of Canadian downtowns, and especially of ones like The Heart of Toronto, that are well-informed and solidly grounded in the particularities of an urban place.
期刊介绍:
American Nineteenth Century History is a peer-reviewed, transatlantic journal devoted to the history of the United States during the long nineteenth century. It welcomes contributions on themes and topics relating to America in this period: slavery, race and ethnicity, the Civil War and Reconstruction, military history, American nationalism, urban history, immigration and ethnicity, western history, the history of women, gender studies, African Americans and Native Americans, cultural studies and comparative pieces. In addition to articles based on original research, historiographical pieces, reassessments of historical controversies, and reappraisals of prominent events or individuals are welcome. Special issues devoted to a particular theme or topic will also be considered.