Study on Cleaner Production Subsidies, Income Distribution Imbalance and Carbon Emissions Permit Reallocation Mechanism

Qingquan Fan, Jingran Liu, Jingda Wang
{"title":"Study on Cleaner Production Subsidies, Income Distribution Imbalance and Carbon Emissions Permit Reallocation Mechanism","authors":"Qingquan Fan, Jingran Liu, Jingda Wang","doi":"10.1515/cfer-2022-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The allocation mechanism for carbon emissions permit(CEP) is an institutional guarantee for advancing the development of China’s unified carbon trading market. The initial allocation of carbon quotas fails to solve new inequalities stemming from subsidizing cleaner production. This paper constructs a theoretical framework that describes China’s progressive decline in carbon intensity, calculates the equilibrium solution on the neoclassical saddle point path using the shooting method, and studies the income distribution imbalance caused by cleaner production subsidies and the reallocation mechanism of carbon emissions permit The main conclusion is that the incremental cleaner production subsidy policy meets the goal of maximizing welfare on the saddle point path, but it may lead to over-investment in the clean sector, thus causing the income distribution imbalance among entities. Further research suggests that the amount of carbon emissions permit acquired by the clean sector should be higher than the actual emissions in the trading market and that, as the cleaner support increases, the share of carbon emissions permit acquired by the sector should be constantly increased through reallocation mechanism. This helps achieve the Pareto improvement in all parties’ economic benefits.","PeriodicalId":66259,"journal":{"name":"China Finance and Economic Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"66 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Finance and Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2022-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The allocation mechanism for carbon emissions permit(CEP) is an institutional guarantee for advancing the development of China’s unified carbon trading market. The initial allocation of carbon quotas fails to solve new inequalities stemming from subsidizing cleaner production. This paper constructs a theoretical framework that describes China’s progressive decline in carbon intensity, calculates the equilibrium solution on the neoclassical saddle point path using the shooting method, and studies the income distribution imbalance caused by cleaner production subsidies and the reallocation mechanism of carbon emissions permit The main conclusion is that the incremental cleaner production subsidy policy meets the goal of maximizing welfare on the saddle point path, but it may lead to over-investment in the clean sector, thus causing the income distribution imbalance among entities. Further research suggests that the amount of carbon emissions permit acquired by the clean sector should be higher than the actual emissions in the trading market and that, as the cleaner support increases, the share of carbon emissions permit acquired by the sector should be constantly increased through reallocation mechanism. This helps achieve the Pareto improvement in all parties’ economic benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
清洁生产补贴、收入分配失衡与碳排放许可再分配机制研究
摘要碳排放许可证分配机制是推进中国统一碳交易市场发展的制度保障。碳配额的最初分配未能解决因补贴清洁生产而产生的新的不平等问题。本文构建了一个描述中国碳强度逐步下降的理论框架,并研究了清洁生产补贴造成的收入分配失衡和碳排放许可证的再分配机制。主要结论是,增量清洁生产补贴政策满足了鞍点路径上福利最大化的目标,但可能导致对清洁部门的过度投资,从而造成实体间收入分配不平衡。进一步的研究表明,清洁部门获得的碳排放许可证数量应高于交易市场的实际排放量,随着清洁支持的增加,该部门获得的二氧化碳排放许可证份额应通过再分配机制不断增加。这有助于实现各方经济效益的帕累托改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
期刊最新文献
The Effect of “Pressure-Type” Fiscal Incentives on Industrial Restructuring in China A Study of Coordinating China’s Two-Pillar Regulatory Policy under the Shock of the Fed’s Interest Rate Hike—From the Perspective of “Stable Growth” and “Risk Prevention” The “Stagflation” Risk and Policy Control: Causes, Governance and Inspirations Robot Application and Adjustment of Export Product Scope: Can We Have Both Efficiency and Quality? Convergence Analysis of Village Collective Economy Based on a Long-Term (1978–2018) Observation of 40 Villages in the Suburbs of Beijing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1