A Pilot Study of a Screening Process for Evaluating the Physical, Mental and Cognitive Health of Senior Physicians

D. Bazzo, P. Smith, E. Wenghofer
{"title":"A Pilot Study of a Screening Process for Evaluating the Physical, Mental and Cognitive Health of Senior Physicians","authors":"D. Bazzo, P. Smith, E. Wenghofer","doi":"10.30770/2572-1852-107.2.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Physicians are not immune to changes that accompany aging, including decreases in physical and cognitive health and abilities. Many are calling for, or turning to, screening senior physicians for decrements in their ability to provide safe care. Our purpose was to determine the acceptability and feasibility of a pilot screening process, which evaluates the physical, mental and cognitive health of senior physicians. The screening process was developed by the University of California, San Diego, Physician Assessment and Clinical Education Program. The screen included: mental health screening (PHQ-9, GAD-7, and substance abuse screen), cognitive health screening (MicroCog™ and Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA©]) and physical health screening (medical history review and physical examination). Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted post-screening. Thirty senior physicians participated in the pilot process, including post-screening interviews. Eight (27%) participants were judged to “require”/“may require” further evaluation after cognitive assessment. No physicians were found to have physical or mental health issues that would prevent them from practicing competently. Interviews revealed that participants felt the screening process was a positive experience that was effective, acceptable, efficient and relevant to their practice. The results of this pilot study indicate that screening physical, mental and cognitive health is considered both feasible and acceptable to senior physicians. This is important as screening the health and cognition of senior physicians is integral to the national discussion related to regulation and patient safety.","PeriodicalId":91752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical regulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30770/2572-1852-107.2.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physicians are not immune to changes that accompany aging, including decreases in physical and cognitive health and abilities. Many are calling for, or turning to, screening senior physicians for decrements in their ability to provide safe care. Our purpose was to determine the acceptability and feasibility of a pilot screening process, which evaluates the physical, mental and cognitive health of senior physicians. The screening process was developed by the University of California, San Diego, Physician Assessment and Clinical Education Program. The screen included: mental health screening (PHQ-9, GAD-7, and substance abuse screen), cognitive health screening (MicroCog™ and Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA©]) and physical health screening (medical history review and physical examination). Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted post-screening. Thirty senior physicians participated in the pilot process, including post-screening interviews. Eight (27%) participants were judged to “require”/“may require” further evaluation after cognitive assessment. No physicians were found to have physical or mental health issues that would prevent them from practicing competently. Interviews revealed that participants felt the screening process was a positive experience that was effective, acceptable, efficient and relevant to their practice. The results of this pilot study indicate that screening physical, mental and cognitive health is considered both feasible and acceptable to senior physicians. This is important as screening the health and cognition of senior physicians is integral to the national discussion related to regulation and patient safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估老年医师身体、心理和认知健康筛查过程的初步研究
医生也不能免受衰老带来的变化的影响,包括身体和认知健康和能力的下降。许多人呼吁或求助于对资深医生进行筛查,以了解他们提供安全护理的能力下降。我们的目的是确定试点筛查过程的可接受性和可行性,该过程评估高级医生的身体、心理和认知健康。筛查过程由加州大学圣地亚哥分校医师评估和临床教育项目开发。筛查包括:心理健康筛查(PHQ-9、GAD-7和药物滥用筛查)、认知健康筛查(MicroCog™ 和蒙特利尔认知评估[MoCA©])和身体健康筛查(病史回顾和体检)。筛选后进行定性半结构化访谈。30名资深医生参与了试点过程,包括筛查后的访谈。八名(27%)参与者在认知评估后被判断为“需要”/“可能需要”进一步评估。没有发现医生有身体或心理健康问题会妨碍他们胜任执业。访谈显示,参与者认为筛选过程是一种积极的体验,有效、可接受、高效且与他们的实践相关。这项试点研究的结果表明,筛查身体、心理和认知健康被认为是可行的,也是高级医生可以接受的。这一点很重要,因为对资深医生的健康和认知进行筛查是国家监管和患者安全讨论的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regulating Professions: The Emergence of Professional Self-Regulation in Four Canadian Provinces COVID-denial Invites License Revocation in the UK Regulatory Body Perspectives on Complaints and Disciplinary Action Processes for Health Professionals Physician Well-Being and Patient Safety: The Crossroads to the Best in Medicine What Could (Or Should) Be the Regulatory Response to the Wicked Problem of Climate Change?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1