President Trump’s Travel Ban: inciting or deterring terrorism?

Omi Hodwitz, H. Tracy
{"title":"President Trump’s Travel Ban: inciting or deterring terrorism?","authors":"Omi Hodwitz, H. Tracy","doi":"10.1080/19434472.2019.1701525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The implementation of President Trump’s Travel Ban resulted in resounding support and opposition in the United States and abroad. Both opponents and proponents presented strong arguments focused in part on national security. The study reported here seeks to assess these claims by empirically examining the effectiveness of the policy in achieving its purported goal of decreasing terrorism. The study, using multiple analytical strategies, assesses terrorism in the United States leading up to and following the implementation of the Travel Ban. Results indicate that the policy may have contributed to a short term decrease in terrorism in the days immediately following the policy. However, this trend quickly reversed as terrorism rates significantly increased in the weeks and months following implementation.","PeriodicalId":54174,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression","volume":"12 1","pages":"292 - 306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19434472.2019.1701525","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2019.1701525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT The implementation of President Trump’s Travel Ban resulted in resounding support and opposition in the United States and abroad. Both opponents and proponents presented strong arguments focused in part on national security. The study reported here seeks to assess these claims by empirically examining the effectiveness of the policy in achieving its purported goal of decreasing terrorism. The study, using multiple analytical strategies, assesses terrorism in the United States leading up to and following the implementation of the Travel Ban. Results indicate that the policy may have contributed to a short term decrease in terrorism in the days immediately following the policy. However, this trend quickly reversed as terrorism rates significantly increased in the weeks and months following implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特朗普总统的旅行禁令:煽动还是阻止恐怖主义?
摘要特朗普总统旅行禁令的实施在美国国内外引起了强烈的支持和反对。反对者和支持者都提出了强有力的论点,部分集中在国家安全上。本文报道的研究试图通过实证检验该政策在实现其所谓的减少恐怖主义目标方面的有效性来评估这些说法。该研究采用多种分析策略,评估了旅行禁令实施前后美国的恐怖主义情况。结果表明,该政策可能有助于在政策出台后的几天内短期减少恐怖主义。然而,随着恐怖主义发生率在实施后的几周和几个月内大幅上升,这一趋势迅速扭转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of gendered frames in far-right rhetoric in the West Was the 2019 Christchurch attack a black swan event? Understanding far-right violence in New Zealand Understanding and addressing the risk of disguised compliance in CVE programming ‘It's time to put the copes down and get to work’: a qualitative study of incel exit strategies on r/IncelExit Frame your friends close and your enemies closer: how al-Masra newspaper imagines individuals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1