The effect of different periods of unconventional monetary policies on Japanese financial markets

IF 1.3 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Financial Economic Policy Pub Date : 2023-05-11 DOI:10.1108/jfep-11-2022-0275
Wee‐Yeap Lau, Tien-Ming Yip
{"title":"The effect of different periods of unconventional monetary policies on Japanese financial markets","authors":"Wee‐Yeap Lau, Tien-Ming Yip","doi":"10.1108/jfep-11-2022-0275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine to what extent the Japanese financial markets are affected by the four periods of unconventional monetary policies (UMP) implemented by the Bank of Japan from 2013 to 2020.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing the daily 10-year term spread as a proxy for monetary easing policy, this study uses four sub-sample periods from 2013 to 2020 to look into the effectiveness of UMP on the Japanese financial markets.\n\n\nFindings\nOur result shows that not all of the Bank of Japan's unconventional monetary policies are equally effective in influencing the Japanese financial markets. In particular, the QQE policy implemented from April 2013 to October 2014 effectively influenced the stock market, banking sector and foreign exchange market. However, the financial market impact of monetary policy is muted during the QQE expansion period. Likewise, the QQE with a negative interest rate policy influences only the banking sector. Finally, the QQE with its yield curve control policy effectively impacts the financial markets.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis research can be expanded by studying the international spillover effect of the Bank of Japan's UMP on the financial markets in Asian countries.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings of this study enable investors to understand the causal relationship between the Bank of Japan's UMP and the financial market indicators, thereby helping them to position their portfolio investments. From the policy perspective, the finding is useful to inform the Bank of Japan on which policy is relatively effective in affecting the financial markets. In light of the empirical finding, the Bank of Japan should continue to pursue the QQE YCCP or revert to the initial QQE policy, as the two policies are relatively more effective than the QQE expansion and QQE NIRP in affecting the Japanese financial markets.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe empirical finding highlights the importance of controlling for the impact of different QQE policies in the model. Future research may consider conducting sub-sample analysis to cater to the different QQE policy regimes. This approach provides a clearer picture and valid inferences on the financial market impact of each QQE policy.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study provides a comprehensive analysis of the impact of Bank of Japan's QQE on the Japanese financial markets. For the market participants, the findings of this study suggest that investors should closely gauge the development of the unconventional monetary policies of the Bank of Japan because the monetary easing policy influences the decision-making process of commercial banks, pension funds, mutual funds, retail investors and other stakeholders in the financial markets. The policy twist will have future ramifications for their loan, investment and retirement fund portfolios.\n","PeriodicalId":45556,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Economic Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfep-11-2022-0275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine to what extent the Japanese financial markets are affected by the four periods of unconventional monetary policies (UMP) implemented by the Bank of Japan from 2013 to 2020. Design/methodology/approach Using the daily 10-year term spread as a proxy for monetary easing policy, this study uses four sub-sample periods from 2013 to 2020 to look into the effectiveness of UMP on the Japanese financial markets. Findings Our result shows that not all of the Bank of Japan's unconventional monetary policies are equally effective in influencing the Japanese financial markets. In particular, the QQE policy implemented from April 2013 to October 2014 effectively influenced the stock market, banking sector and foreign exchange market. However, the financial market impact of monetary policy is muted during the QQE expansion period. Likewise, the QQE with a negative interest rate policy influences only the banking sector. Finally, the QQE with its yield curve control policy effectively impacts the financial markets. Research limitations/implications This research can be expanded by studying the international spillover effect of the Bank of Japan's UMP on the financial markets in Asian countries. Practical implications The findings of this study enable investors to understand the causal relationship between the Bank of Japan's UMP and the financial market indicators, thereby helping them to position their portfolio investments. From the policy perspective, the finding is useful to inform the Bank of Japan on which policy is relatively effective in affecting the financial markets. In light of the empirical finding, the Bank of Japan should continue to pursue the QQE YCCP or revert to the initial QQE policy, as the two policies are relatively more effective than the QQE expansion and QQE NIRP in affecting the Japanese financial markets. Social implications The empirical finding highlights the importance of controlling for the impact of different QQE policies in the model. Future research may consider conducting sub-sample analysis to cater to the different QQE policy regimes. This approach provides a clearer picture and valid inferences on the financial market impact of each QQE policy. Originality/value This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the impact of Bank of Japan's QQE on the Japanese financial markets. For the market participants, the findings of this study suggest that investors should closely gauge the development of the unconventional monetary policies of the Bank of Japan because the monetary easing policy influences the decision-making process of commercial banks, pension funds, mutual funds, retail investors and other stakeholders in the financial markets. The policy twist will have future ramifications for their loan, investment and retirement fund portfolios.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同时期的非常规货币政策对日本金融市场的影响
目的本研究旨在检验日本金融市场在多大程度上受到日本央行从2013年到2020年实施的四个时期的非常规货币政策(UMP)的影响。设计/方法/方法使用每日10年期利差作为货币宽松政策的代表,本研究使用2013年至2020年的四个子样本期来研究UMP对日本金融市场的有效性。我们的研究结果表明,并非所有日本央行的非常规货币政策都能同样有效地影响日本金融市场。特别是,2013年4月至2014年10月实施的量化宽松政策有效影响了股市、银行业和外汇市场。然而,在量化宽松扩张期间,货币政策对金融市场的影响减弱。同样,负利率政策的量化宽松只影响银行业。最后,量化宽松及其收益率曲线控制政策有效地影响了金融市场。研究局限性/含义本研究可以通过研究日本银行UMP对亚洲国家金融市场的国际溢出效应来扩展。实际含义本研究的结果使投资者能够理解日本银行的UMP与金融市场指标之间的因果关系,从而帮助他们定位投资组合。从政策角度来看,这一发现有助于向日本央行通报哪项政策在影响金融市场方面相对有效。根据经验发现,日本央行应继续推行量化宽松YCCP或恢复最初的量化宽松政策,因为这两项政策在影响日本金融市场方面相对比量化宽松扩张和量化宽松NIRP更有效。社会含义实证发现强调了在模型中控制不同量化宽松政策影响的重要性。未来的研究可能会考虑进行子样本分析,以适应不同的量化宽松政策制度。这种方法对每项量化宽松政策对金融市场的影响提供了更清晰的了解和有效的推断。原创性/价值本研究全面分析了日本银行量化宽松政策对日本金融市场的影响。对于市场参与者来说,本研究的结果表明,投资者应该密切关注日本央行非常规货币政策的发展,因为货币宽松政策影响着商业银行、养老基金、共同基金、散户投资者和金融市场其他利益相关者的决策过程。这一政策转折将对他们的贷款、投资和退休基金组合产生未来影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Economic Policy publishes high quality peer reviewed research on financial economic policy issues. The journal is devoted to the advancement of the understanding of the entire spectrum of financial policy and control issues and their interactions to economic phenomena. Economic and financial phenomena involve complex trade-offs and linkages between various types of risk factors and variables of interest to policy makers and market participants alike. Market participants such as economic policy makers, regulators, banking and competition supervisors, corporations and financial institutions, require timely and robust answers to the contemporary and emerging policy questions. In turn, such answers require thorough input by the academics, policy makers and practitioners alike. The Journal of Financial Economic Policy provides the forum to satisfy this need. The journal publishes and invites concise papers to enable a prompt response to current and emerging policy affairs.
期刊最新文献
The impact of formal and informal credit institutions on entrepreneurship Financial inclusion and household consumption behaviour in Ghana The absorptive capacity of the institution in the link between remittances and financial development in Africa: an advance panel regression Why do Indian exporting firms borrow in foreign currency? Volatility dynamics in energy and agriculture markets: An analysis of domestic and global uncertainty factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1