Joint Space Narrowing in the Osteoarthritic Knee

Joseph S. Vespe, D. Hope, David E. Vizurraga, Meghan Joyce
{"title":"Joint Space Narrowing in the Osteoarthritic Knee","authors":"Joseph S. Vespe, D. Hope, David E. Vizurraga, Meghan Joyce","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.JOPA.22.00029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: When patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) are referred to an orthopaedic specialist for care, standard evaluation includes anterior-to-posterior (AP) weight-bearing (WB) radiographs to best evaluate the degree of arthritis and residual joint space, which can tailor treatment recommendations. Primary care guidelines do not require radiographs for their diagnosis; if performed, they are often non–weight-bearing (NWB). This study assessed the significance of joint space narrowing (JSN) between NWB and WB knee radiographs in patients evaluated for OA. We also compared demographic data with the measure of JSN. Methods: This was a prospective quantitative study that followed an experimental design comparing the JSN of the same AP NWB knee with WB knee radiographs. Two blinded fellowship-trained orthopaedic adult reconstruction surgeons and 1 musculoskeletal radiology fellow performed the joint space measurements. Data were analyzed using the Student t test and χ2 test as appropriate. Results: The mean JSN between WB and NWB was 1.20 mm (95% confidence interval 0.93-1.49 mm, p < 0.0001). Interrater reliability between NWB and WB measurements was 0.87 and 0.93, respectively. As body mass index (BMI) increased in our population, the amount of JSN decreased. There were significantly higher rates of JSN in those who were not obese compared with those who were. Conclusions: Weight-bearing radiographs are better able to evaluate JSN than NWB. BMI had a negative correlation with JSN in our population. Level of Evidence: II.","PeriodicalId":93583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopedics for physician assistants","volume":"11 1","pages":"e22.00029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopedics for physician assistants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.JOPA.22.00029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: When patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) are referred to an orthopaedic specialist for care, standard evaluation includes anterior-to-posterior (AP) weight-bearing (WB) radiographs to best evaluate the degree of arthritis and residual joint space, which can tailor treatment recommendations. Primary care guidelines do not require radiographs for their diagnosis; if performed, they are often non–weight-bearing (NWB). This study assessed the significance of joint space narrowing (JSN) between NWB and WB knee radiographs in patients evaluated for OA. We also compared demographic data with the measure of JSN. Methods: This was a prospective quantitative study that followed an experimental design comparing the JSN of the same AP NWB knee with WB knee radiographs. Two blinded fellowship-trained orthopaedic adult reconstruction surgeons and 1 musculoskeletal radiology fellow performed the joint space measurements. Data were analyzed using the Student t test and χ2 test as appropriate. Results: The mean JSN between WB and NWB was 1.20 mm (95% confidence interval 0.93-1.49 mm, p < 0.0001). Interrater reliability between NWB and WB measurements was 0.87 and 0.93, respectively. As body mass index (BMI) increased in our population, the amount of JSN decreased. There were significantly higher rates of JSN in those who were not obese compared with those who were. Conclusions: Weight-bearing radiographs are better able to evaluate JSN than NWB. BMI had a negative correlation with JSN in our population. Level of Evidence: II.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨性关节炎膝关节的关节间隙变窄
背景:当膝骨关节炎(OA)患者被转诊到骨科专家那里接受治疗时,标准评估包括前后(AP)承重(WB)X线片,以最佳地评估关节炎和残余关节间隙的程度,这可以定制治疗建议。初级保健指南不要求对其进行射线照相诊断;如果进行,它们通常是非承重的(NWB)。本研究评估了NWB和WB膝关节X线片在OA患者中关节间隙变窄(JSN)的意义。我们还将人口统计数据与JSN的衡量标准进行了比较。方法:这是一项前瞻性定量研究,遵循实验设计,将同一AP NWB膝关节的JSN与WB膝关节X线片进行比较。两名接受过盲法研究金培训的整形外科成年重建外科医生和一名肌肉骨骼放射学研究员进行了关节间隙测量。数据采用Student t检验和χ2检验进行分析。结果:WB和NWB之间的平均JSN为1.20mm(95%置信区间0.93-1.49mm,p<0.0001)。NWB和WB测量之间的内部可靠性分别为0.87和0.93。随着我们人群中体重指数(BMI)的增加,JSN的数量减少。与肥胖者相比,非肥胖者的JSN发生率明显更高。结论:与NWB相比,负重X线片能更好地评估JSN。在我们的人群中,BMI与JSN呈负相关。证据级别:二。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parsonage-Turner Syndrome in a 9-Year-Old Boy Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis on Miserable Malalignment Syndrome Cervicothoracic Morel-Lavallée Lesion After a High-Speed Motor Vehicle Crash Foundation of Diagnosing and Treating a Hoffa Fracture A Comparison Review of Various Corticosteroids in the Orthopaedic Setting for Various Injections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1