Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular and Endoscopic Interventions on the Gonadal Veins in the Treatment of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome

Q4 Medicine Flebologiya Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.17116/flebo202014031175
S. Gavrilov, A. Sazhin, G. V. Krasavin, E. Moskalenko, N. Mishakina
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular and Endoscopic Interventions on the Gonadal Veins in the Treatment of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome","authors":"S. Gavrilov, A. Sazhin, G. V. Krasavin, E. Moskalenko, N. Mishakina","doi":"10.17116/flebo202014031175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To compare an efficacy and safety of endovascular and endoscopic interventions on the gonadal vein in the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). Material and methods. Treatment outcomes were analyzed in 97 patients with PCS. All patients were divided into 2 groups. The first group included 67 patients who underwent endovascular embolization of gonadal veins (EEGV), the second group — 28 women who underwent endoscopic resection of gonadal veins (ERGV). A comparative analysis of efficacy of EEGV and ERGV in the treatment of PCS was based on assessment of the effect of these interventions on pelvic pain, safety of operations, their effect on pelvic venous reflux, diameter of the pelvic veins and restoration of daily activity. Флебология 2020, т. 14, No 3, с. 175-183 https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175 Flebologiya 2020, vol. 14, no 3, pp. 175-183 https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175","PeriodicalId":37563,"journal":{"name":"Flebologiya","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flebologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Objective. To compare an efficacy and safety of endovascular and endoscopic interventions on the gonadal vein in the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). Material and methods. Treatment outcomes were analyzed in 97 patients with PCS. All patients were divided into 2 groups. The first group included 67 patients who underwent endovascular embolization of gonadal veins (EEGV), the second group — 28 women who underwent endoscopic resection of gonadal veins (ERGV). A comparative analysis of efficacy of EEGV and ERGV in the treatment of PCS was based on assessment of the effect of these interventions on pelvic pain, safety of operations, their effect on pelvic venous reflux, diameter of the pelvic veins and restoration of daily activity. Флебология 2020, т. 14, No 3, с. 175-183 https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175 Flebologiya 2020, vol. 14, no 3, pp. 175-183 https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gonadal静脉血管内和内镜介入治疗盆腔充血综合征的疗效和安全性比较分析
客观的比较性腺静脉血管内和内窥镜介入治疗盆腔充血综合征(PCS)的疗效和安全性。材料和方法。对97例PCS患者的治疗结果进行分析。所有患者被分为2组。第一组包括67名接受性腺静脉血管内栓塞(EEGV)的患者,第二组是28名接受内镜下性腺静脉切除(ERGV)手术的女性。EEGV和ERGV治疗PCS的疗效比较分析是基于对这些干预措施对骨盆疼痛、手术安全性、对骨盆静脉回流、骨盆静脉直径和日常活动恢复的影响的评估。2020年。14,编号3。175-183https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175Flebologiya 2020,第14卷,第3期,第175-183页https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Flebologiya
Flebologiya Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Journal of Venous Disorders is a quarterly peer-reviewed medical journal. The journal highlights the key issues of prophylaxis, diagnostics and treatment of the entire spectrum of venous system diseases and their complications including acute (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, superficial thrombophlebitis) and chronic (varicose veins, post-thrombotic syndrome, chronic venous insufficiency) pathologies as well as various lymphatic lesions (lymphedema, etc.). The new edition will encompass the whole range of topical issues including recent achievements of domestic and foreign researchers, applications of innovative technologies in the clinical practice, reviews of the literature, lectures, and results of original investigations: all that can be of interest for phlebologists, vascular surgeons, other medical specialists dealing with venous pathology in their practical work. The journal was established in 2007. The only Russian journal that reflecting a broad range of problems in diagnosis, treatment and prevention of acute and chronic venous diseases.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Guidelines and Practical Experience: What to Do for Contradictions? Response to Comment to the Article “Does the Use of Prognostic Scales and Clinical Guidelines Always Guarantee the Survival of Patients with Massive Pulmonary Embolism” Compliance with 15—20 mm Hg Compression Pantyhose in Female Patients with C0S-C2S Chronic Venous Disease Venoactive Drug Treatment or Compression Stockings in Warm Weather Season in Symptomatic Patients with Chronic Venous Disease Extended Compression Decreases Hyperpigmentation Rate after Sclerotherapy in Patients with Spider Veins and Telangiectasias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1