Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Natural Gas Identification with Mixed Potential Electrochemical Sensor Arrays

Neal Ma, Sleight Halley, K. Ramaiyan, F. Garzon, L. Tsui
{"title":"Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Natural Gas Identification with Mixed Potential Electrochemical Sensor Arrays","authors":"Neal Ma, Sleight Halley, K. Ramaiyan, F. Garzon, L. Tsui","doi":"10.1149/2754-2726/acbe0c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mixed-potential electrochemical sensor arrays consisting of indium tin oxide (ITO), La0.87Sr0.13CrO3, Au, and Pt electrodes can detect the leaks from natural gas infrastructure. Algorithms are needed to correctly identify natural gas sources from background natural and anthropogenic sources such as wetlands or agriculture. We report for the first time a comparison of several machine learning methods for mixture identification in the context of natural gas emissions monitoring by mixed potential sensor arrays. Random Forest, Artificial Neural Network, and Nearest Neighbor methods successfully classified air mixtures containing only CH4, two types of natural gas simulants, and CH4+NH3 with >98% identification accuracy. The model complexity of these methods were optimized and the degree of robustness against overfitting was determined. Finally, these methods are benchmarked on both desktop PC and single-board computer hardware to simulate their application in a portable internet-of-things sensor package. The combined results show that the random forest method is the preferred method for mixture identification with its high accuracy (>98%), robustness against overfitting with increasing model complexity, and had less than 10 ms training time and less than 0.1 ms inference time on single-board computer hardware.","PeriodicalId":72870,"journal":{"name":"ECS sensors plus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECS sensors plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1149/2754-2726/acbe0c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mixed-potential electrochemical sensor arrays consisting of indium tin oxide (ITO), La0.87Sr0.13CrO3, Au, and Pt electrodes can detect the leaks from natural gas infrastructure. Algorithms are needed to correctly identify natural gas sources from background natural and anthropogenic sources such as wetlands or agriculture. We report for the first time a comparison of several machine learning methods for mixture identification in the context of natural gas emissions monitoring by mixed potential sensor arrays. Random Forest, Artificial Neural Network, and Nearest Neighbor methods successfully classified air mixtures containing only CH4, two types of natural gas simulants, and CH4+NH3 with >98% identification accuracy. The model complexity of these methods were optimized and the degree of robustness against overfitting was determined. Finally, these methods are benchmarked on both desktop PC and single-board computer hardware to simulate their application in a portable internet-of-things sensor package. The combined results show that the random forest method is the preferred method for mixture identification with its high accuracy (>98%), robustness against overfitting with increasing model complexity, and had less than 10 ms training time and less than 0.1 ms inference time on single-board computer hardware.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合电位电化学传感器阵列识别天然气的机器学习算法比较
由氧化铟锡(ITO)、La0.87Sr0.13CrO3、Au和Pt电极组成的混合电位电化学传感器阵列可以检测天然气基础设施的泄漏。需要算法从湿地或农业等背景自然和人为来源中正确识别天然气来源。我们首次报道了在混合电位传感器阵列监测天然气排放的背景下,几种用于混合物识别的机器学习方法的比较。随机森林、人工神经网络和最近邻方法成功地对仅含有CH4、两种类型的天然气模拟物和CH4+NH3的空气混合物进行了分类,识别准确率>98%。对这些方法的模型复杂度进行了优化,并确定了对过拟合的鲁棒性程度。最后,在台式PC和单板计算机硬件上对这些方法进行了测试,以模拟它们在便携式物联网传感器包中的应用。综合结果表明,随机森林方法是混合识别的首选方法,其精度高(>98%),对模型复杂度增加的过拟合具有鲁棒性,在单板计算机硬件上的训练时间小于10ms,推理时间小于0.1ms。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review—Energy and Power Requirements for Wearable Sensors 3D Printed Carbon Nanotubes Reinforced Polydimethylsiloxane Flexible Sensors for Tactile Sensing Editors’ Choice—Review—Advances in Electrochemical Sensors: Improving Food Safety, Quality, and Traceability Field Testing of a Mixed Potential IoT Sensor Platform for Methane Quantification Automated Quantification of DNA Damage Using Deep Learning and Use of Synthetic Data Generated from Basic Geometric Shapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1