Birds of a feather: brand attachment through the lens of consumer political ideologies

IF 5.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Product and Brand Management Pub Date : 2021-10-27 DOI:10.1108/JPBM-01-2020-2719
Richard L. Flight, Kesha K. Coker
{"title":"Birds of a feather: brand attachment through the lens of consumer political ideologies","authors":"Richard L. Flight, Kesha K. Coker","doi":"10.1108/JPBM-01-2020-2719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today’s world of heightened sociopolitical issues, consumer political ideologies may determine the nature of consumer-brand relationships. Consumers seek out self-affirming agents (e.g. friends, family and community) to bolster their beliefs, which help develop their sense of self. Increasingly, they also choose brands that fit into and support their worldview alongside other agents. Yet, little is known about the role of consumer political ideologies in shaping consumer behavior and consumer-brand relationships. This study aims to address this gap by exploring alternative political ideologies for market segmentation and brand attachment analysis.,This research uses an online survey for data collection that generated 819 usable responses. Respondents answered questions about their political orientations and then rated their attachment to 66 unique brands. This research uses cluster analysis to establish market segments using libertarian, authoritarian, conservative and liberal political ideologies, then between-group analyzes are used to determine significant differences in brand attachment.,Analysis reveals three clusters of consumers termed, conservative-libertarian, liberal-authoritarian and moderates. In 53% of the brands evaluated, the market segments’ degree of brand attachment differed significantly. Meanwhile, moderates demonstrate an overall stronger average brand attachment than the other market segments.,Findings suggest that shared political ideology provides a viable means to segment a market adding to the psychographic tools already available to brand managers. Findings also suggest that consumer political ideologies help inform brand attachment levels.,Given the ability to segment a market on political ideology, it is found that different segments demonstrate varying levels of brand attachment. In practical terms, using political ideology as a segmenting tool helps define a market segment and has a differentiable effect on attraction toward the brand. Thus, political ideology may be considered as brands position themselves and engage in corporate sociopolitical activism.,This research provides unique insights into consumer political ideology as an alternative segmentation tool and its role in understanding brand attachment.","PeriodicalId":48172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product and Brand Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product and Brand Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-01-2020-2719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In today’s world of heightened sociopolitical issues, consumer political ideologies may determine the nature of consumer-brand relationships. Consumers seek out self-affirming agents (e.g. friends, family and community) to bolster their beliefs, which help develop their sense of self. Increasingly, they also choose brands that fit into and support their worldview alongside other agents. Yet, little is known about the role of consumer political ideologies in shaping consumer behavior and consumer-brand relationships. This study aims to address this gap by exploring alternative political ideologies for market segmentation and brand attachment analysis.,This research uses an online survey for data collection that generated 819 usable responses. Respondents answered questions about their political orientations and then rated their attachment to 66 unique brands. This research uses cluster analysis to establish market segments using libertarian, authoritarian, conservative and liberal political ideologies, then between-group analyzes are used to determine significant differences in brand attachment.,Analysis reveals three clusters of consumers termed, conservative-libertarian, liberal-authoritarian and moderates. In 53% of the brands evaluated, the market segments’ degree of brand attachment differed significantly. Meanwhile, moderates demonstrate an overall stronger average brand attachment than the other market segments.,Findings suggest that shared political ideology provides a viable means to segment a market adding to the psychographic tools already available to brand managers. Findings also suggest that consumer political ideologies help inform brand attachment levels.,Given the ability to segment a market on political ideology, it is found that different segments demonstrate varying levels of brand attachment. In practical terms, using political ideology as a segmenting tool helps define a market segment and has a differentiable effect on attraction toward the brand. Thus, political ideology may be considered as brands position themselves and engage in corporate sociopolitical activism.,This research provides unique insights into consumer political ideology as an alternative segmentation tool and its role in understanding brand attachment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物以类聚:消费者政治意识形态视角下的品牌依恋
在当今社会政治问题日益突出的世界里,消费者的政治意识形态可能决定了消费者品牌关系的性质。消费者寻找自我肯定的代理人(如朋友、家人和社区)来支持他们的信仰,这有助于发展他们的自我意识。他们也越来越多地选择与其他代理商一起符合并支持他们世界观的品牌。然而,人们对消费者政治意识形态在塑造消费者行为和消费者品牌关系中的作用知之甚少。本研究旨在通过探索市场细分和品牌依恋分析的替代政治意识形态来解决这一差距。,这项研究使用了一项在线调查来收集数据,产生了819个可用的回复。受访者回答了有关他们政治取向的问题,然后对他们对66个独特品牌的依恋程度进行了评分。本研究使用聚类分析,使用自由主义、威权主义、保守主义和自由主义的政治意识形态建立细分市场,然后使用组间分析来确定品牌依恋的显著差异。,分析揭示了三类消费者,即保守自由主义者、自由威权主义者和温和派。在53%的受访品牌中,细分市场的品牌依恋程度存在显著差异。同时,温和派总体上表现出比其他细分市场更强的平均品牌依恋。,研究结果表明,共享的政治意识形态为细分市场提供了一种可行的手段,为品牌经理提供了现成的心理工具。研究结果还表明,消费者的政治意识形态有助于了解品牌依恋水平。,考虑到根据政治意识形态划分市场的能力,发现不同的细分市场表现出不同程度的品牌依恋。在实践中,使用政治意识形态作为细分工具有助于定义细分市场,并对品牌吸引力产生不同的影响。因此,政治意识形态可以被视为品牌定位自己并参与企业社会政治活动。,这项研究为消费者政治意识形态作为一种替代的细分工具及其在理解品牌依恋中的作用提供了独特的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Branding has evolved and organizations are facing a lot of new challenges when managing their brand reputations, an activity that has become strategic and interdisciplinary. The Journal of Product and Brand Management (JPBM) advances the theoretical and managerial knowledge of products and brands. Manuscripts may either report results based on rigorously analysed qualitative/quantitative data or be purely conceptual. All manuscripts must offer significant research findings and insights and offer meaningful implications for the real world. This journal is proudly international and inter-disciplinary. We publish manuscripts which compare international markets and encourage submissions approaching branding and product management from any discipline. We focus on all aspects of branding and product management from development to dilution. This includes areas as broad as person, place or political brands.
期刊最新文献
Understanding copycat packaging: a systematic review and research directions Brand purpose: a literature review and BEING implementation framework Make it unique! Why embossed product labels increase purchase intentions and willingness to pay The effect of virtual anchor appearance on purchase intention: a perceived warmth and competence perspective Sustainable food packaging: engagement through the public discourse on social networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1