“Castaway Categories”: Examining the Re-Emergence of the “Underclass” in the UK

IF 2.3 Q1 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Progressive Human Services Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10428232.2017.1399038
P. Garrett
{"title":"“Castaway Categories”: Examining the Re-Emergence of the “Underclass” in the UK","authors":"P. Garrett","doi":"10.1080/10428232.2017.1399038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Throughout the 1980s and early 1990s, discussion of poverty often incorporated references to a so-called underclass and its purported welfare dependency. This largely disparaging keyword now seems to have reappeared; recent uncritical references have been seeping into social work’s academic literature. Dwelling primarily on the United Kingdom, this article reveals that the “underclass” notion seems to have been reignited around the time of the economic crisis that began in 2007. This coincided with public concerns about child-protection services. It was, however, the English riots (August 6 to 11, 2011) that multiplied the use of the appellation underclass in media and political discourses. However, disparaging designations of those who are unemployed or low-waged have been present across centuries; the troubled family is the most recent construction. In this context, Loïc Wacquant furnishes a useful analytical framework to conceptualise how underclass stereotypes and other castaway categories are described, contained, and managed.","PeriodicalId":44255,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","volume":"30 1","pages":"25 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10428232.2017.1399038","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2017.1399038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Throughout the 1980s and early 1990s, discussion of poverty often incorporated references to a so-called underclass and its purported welfare dependency. This largely disparaging keyword now seems to have reappeared; recent uncritical references have been seeping into social work’s academic literature. Dwelling primarily on the United Kingdom, this article reveals that the “underclass” notion seems to have been reignited around the time of the economic crisis that began in 2007. This coincided with public concerns about child-protection services. It was, however, the English riots (August 6 to 11, 2011) that multiplied the use of the appellation underclass in media and political discourses. However, disparaging designations of those who are unemployed or low-waged have been present across centuries; the troubled family is the most recent construction. In this context, Loïc Wacquant furnishes a useful analytical framework to conceptualise how underclass stereotypes and other castaway categories are described, contained, and managed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“漂流者类别”:审视英国“下层阶级”的重新出现
摘要在整个20世纪80年代和90年代初,关于贫困的讨论经常提到所谓的下层阶级及其所谓的福利依赖。这个在很大程度上贬损的关键词现在似乎又出现了;最近不加批判的参考文献已经渗透到社会工作的学术文献中。这篇文章主要关注英国,揭示了“下层阶级”的概念似乎在2007年开始的经济危机前后重新点燃。这与公众对儿童保护服务的担忧不谋而合。然而,正是英语骚乱(2011年8月6日至11日)使下层阶级的称谓在媒体和政治话语中的使用成倍增加。然而,几个世纪以来,对失业者或低收入者的轻蔑称呼一直存在;陷入困境的家庭是最新的构建。在这种背景下,Loïc Wacqunt提供了一个有用的分析框架,以概念化下层刻板印象和其他被抛弃的类别是如何被描述、包含和管理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The only journal of its kind in the United States, the Journal of Progressive Human Services covers political, social, personal, and professional problems in human services from a progressive perspective. The journal stimulates debate about major social issues and contributes to the development of the analytical tools needed for building a caring society based on equality and justice. The journal"s contributors examine oppressed and vulnerable groups, struggles by workers and clients on the job and in the community, dilemmas of practice in conservative contexts, and strategies for ending racism, sexism, ageism, heterosexism, and discrimination of persons who are disabled and psychologically distressed.
期刊最新文献
Meaningful Healthcare and Social Service Access for Homeless Populations: Generating Alliances Through Theories of Therapeutic Landscape An Ineffectual Sermon: Matthew Desmond’s Poverty, by America Social Work Journals and the Disciplinary Production of Alternative Knowledge(s) Social Justice, Anti-Racism, and Disproportionality in Social Work: A Capabilities Approach The Depiction of Mothers with Intellectual Disability: Critical Discourse Analysis of Parenting Capacity Assessments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1