Lay Health Worker-Led Cancer Symptom Screening Intervention and the Effect on Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Health Status, Health Care Use, and Total Costs: Results From a Tri-Part Collaboration.

Q1 Nursing Journal of Oncology Practice Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-09-24 DOI:10.1200/JOP.19.00152
Manali I Patel, David Ramirez, Richy Agajanian, Hilda Agajanian, Jay Bhattacharya, Kate M Bundorf
{"title":"Lay Health Worker-Led Cancer Symptom Screening Intervention and the Effect on Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Health Status, Health Care Use, and Total Costs: Results From a Tri-Part Collaboration.","authors":"Manali I Patel, David Ramirez, Richy Agajanian, Hilda Agajanian, Jay Bhattacharya, Kate M Bundorf","doi":"10.1200/JOP.19.00152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Poor patient experiences and increasing costs from undertreated symptoms require approaches that improve patient-reported outcomes and lower expenditures. We developed and evaluated the effect of a lay health worker (LHW)-led symptom screening intervention on satisfaction, self-reported overall and mental health, health care use, total costs, and survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016, we enrolled in this study all newly diagnosed Medicare Advantage enrollees with stage 3 or 4 solid tumors or hematologic malignancies who were receiving care in a community oncology practice. We evaluated symptom changes from baseline to 12 months for the intervention group. We compared with a control group (a historical cohort of Medicare Advantage enrollees diagnosed with cancer from November 1, 2014, to October 31, 2015) changes in satisfaction and overall and mental health with validated assessments at diagnosis and 5 months postdiagnosis, 12-month health care use, total costs, and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 186 patients in the intervention group and 102 in the control group, most were female and non-Hispanic white or Hispanic, and the mean age was 79 years. There were no survival differences between the groups. Relative to the control group, the intervention group experienced improvements in satisfaction with care (difference-in-difference: 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.63), overall health (odds ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.49 to 3.32), and mental or emotional health (odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.46 to 3.38) over time; fewer hospitalizations (mean ± standard deviation: 0.72 ± 0.96 <i>v</i> 1.02 ± 1.44; <i>P</i> = .03) and emergency department visits per 1,000 members per year (0.61 ± 0.98 <i>v</i> 0.92 ± 1.53; <i>P</i> = .03), and lower median (interquartile range) total health care costs ($21,266 [$8,102-$47,900] <i>v</i> $31,946 [$15,754-$57,369]; <i>P</i> = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An LHW-led symptom screening intervention could be one solution to improve value-based cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"e19-e28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.19.00152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Poor patient experiences and increasing costs from undertreated symptoms require approaches that improve patient-reported outcomes and lower expenditures. We developed and evaluated the effect of a lay health worker (LHW)-led symptom screening intervention on satisfaction, self-reported overall and mental health, health care use, total costs, and survival.

Methods: From November 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016, we enrolled in this study all newly diagnosed Medicare Advantage enrollees with stage 3 or 4 solid tumors or hematologic malignancies who were receiving care in a community oncology practice. We evaluated symptom changes from baseline to 12 months for the intervention group. We compared with a control group (a historical cohort of Medicare Advantage enrollees diagnosed with cancer from November 1, 2014, to October 31, 2015) changes in satisfaction and overall and mental health with validated assessments at diagnosis and 5 months postdiagnosis, 12-month health care use, total costs, and survival.

Results: Among 186 patients in the intervention group and 102 in the control group, most were female and non-Hispanic white or Hispanic, and the mean age was 79 years. There were no survival differences between the groups. Relative to the control group, the intervention group experienced improvements in satisfaction with care (difference-in-difference: 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.63), overall health (odds ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.49 to 3.32), and mental or emotional health (odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.46 to 3.38) over time; fewer hospitalizations (mean ± standard deviation: 0.72 ± 0.96 v 1.02 ± 1.44; P = .03) and emergency department visits per 1,000 members per year (0.61 ± 0.98 v 0.92 ± 1.53; P = .03), and lower median (interquartile range) total health care costs ($21,266 [$8,102-$47,900] v $31,946 [$15,754-$57,369]; P = .02).

Conclusion: An LHW-led symptom screening intervention could be one solution to improve value-based cancer care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非专业卫生工作者主导的癌症症状筛查干预及其对患者报告满意度、健康状况、医疗保健使用和总成本的影响:来自三方合作的结果
目的治疗不足症状带来的患者体验不佳和成本增加需要改善患者报告的结果并降低支出的方法。我们开发并评估了非专业卫生工作者(LHW)领导的症状筛查干预对满意度、自我报告的整体和心理健康、医疗保健使用、总成本和生存率的影响。方法从2015年11月1日至2016年9月30日,我们纳入了这项研究,所有新诊断为Medicare Advantage的3期或4期实体瘤或血液系统恶性肿瘤患者都在社区肿瘤诊所接受治疗。我们评估了干预组从基线到12个月的症状变化。我们与对照组(2014年11月1日至2015年10月31日被诊断为癌症的Medicare Advantage注册者的历史队列)进行了比较,并在诊断时和诊断后5个月、12个月的医疗保健使用、总成本和生存率进行了经验证的评估。结果在186例干预组和102例对照组患者中,大多数是女性和非西班牙裔白人或西班牙牙裔,平均年龄79岁。两组之间无生存差异。与对照组相比,随着时间的推移,干预组在护理满意度(差异:1.35;95%置信区间,1.08-1.63)、整体健康(比值比,2.23;95%可信区间,1.49-3.32)和心理或情绪健康(比值比,2.22;95%信息区间,1.46-3.38)方面有所改善;住院人数减少(平均值±标准差:0.72±0.96 vs 1.02±1.44;P=0.03),每1000名成员每年急诊就诊次数减少(0.61±0.98 vs 0.92±1.53;P=.03),以及较低的中位(四分位间距)总医疗费用(21266美元[8102美元-47900美元]对31946美元[15754-57369];P=.02)。结论LHW主导的症状筛查干预可能是改善癌症价值观护理的一种解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oncology Practice
Journal of Oncology Practice Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Practice (JOP) provides necessary information and insights to keep oncology practice current on changes and challenges inherent in delivering quality oncology care. All content dealing with understanding the provision of care—the mechanics of practice—is the purview of JOP. JOP also addresses an expressed need of practicing physicians to have compressed, expert opinion addressing common clinical problems.
期刊最新文献
Improving Documentation of Pain and Constipation Management Within the Cancer Center of a Large Urban Academic Hospital. Integrating Family Caregiver Support Into a Gynecologic Oncology Practice: An ASCO Quality Training Program Project. Impact of an Electronic Medical Record Alert on Code Status Documentation for Hospitalized Patients With Advanced Cancer. Employment Outcomes, Financial Burden, Anxiety, and Depression Among Caregivers of African American Cancer Survivors. Unpacking Trial Offers and Low Accrual Rates: A Qualitative Analysis of Clinic Visits With Physicians and Patients Potentially Eligible for a Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1