Revisiting the Firm, Reporting Entity, and Going Concern Concepts in Light of Financial Crisis

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting Accounting and the Public Interest Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI:10.2308/APIN-51919
L. Moore
{"title":"Revisiting the Firm, Reporting Entity, and Going Concern Concepts in Light of Financial Crisis","authors":"L. Moore","doi":"10.2308/APIN-51919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: Contemporary accounting conceptual frameworks depict reporting entities as self-evident stand-alone units whose current activities are likely to continue. That representation is revisited in light of Veblen's (1904) sabotage thesis that managers routinely utilize mechanisms that disrupt underlying markets. Credit default swaps played a significant role in the 2008 subprime financial crisis, blurring the boundaries of entities to create entanglements that threatened the global financial infrastructure. The reporting entity and going concern concepts developed in a climate of philosophical pragmatism operating from a flawed premise that a scientific approach assures objective, value-free data. The conventional treatment of reporting entities is contrasted with emerging conversations that paint “the firm” as a legal fiction functioning within a dynamic and potentially unstable matrix. The paper argues that a distorted view on the underlying nature of the firm masks significant public interest issue...","PeriodicalId":38883,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and the Public Interest","volume":"17 1","pages":"130-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and the Public Interest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/APIN-51919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Contemporary accounting conceptual frameworks depict reporting entities as self-evident stand-alone units whose current activities are likely to continue. That representation is revisited in light of Veblen's (1904) sabotage thesis that managers routinely utilize mechanisms that disrupt underlying markets. Credit default swaps played a significant role in the 2008 subprime financial crisis, blurring the boundaries of entities to create entanglements that threatened the global financial infrastructure. The reporting entity and going concern concepts developed in a climate of philosophical pragmatism operating from a flawed premise that a scientific approach assures objective, value-free data. The conventional treatment of reporting entities is contrasted with emerging conversations that paint “the firm” as a legal fiction functioning within a dynamic and potentially unstable matrix. The paper argues that a distorted view on the underlying nature of the firm masks significant public interest issue...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融危机背景下对公司、报告实体和持续经营概念的重新审视
摘要:当代会计概念框架将报告实体描述为不言自明的独立单位,其当前活动可能会继续。鉴于Veblen(1904)的蓄意破坏理论,即经理人经常利用破坏基础市场的机制,重新审视了这种代表性。信用违约掉期在2008年次贷危机中发挥了重要作用,模糊了实体的边界,制造了威胁全球金融基础设施的纠葛。报告实体和持续经营概念是在哲学实用主义的氛围中发展起来的,其前提是科学的方法可以确保客观、无价值的数据。对报告实体的传统处理与新兴的对话形成了鲜明对比,这些对话将“公司”描绘成一个在动态且潜在不稳定的矩阵中运作的法律虚构。文章认为,对公司基本性质的扭曲看法掩盖了重大的公共利益问题。。。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting and the Public Interest
Accounting and the Public Interest Business, Management and Accounting-Accounting
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Self-Concept Priming and Message Framing As Strategies for Improving Individuals’ Compliance: A Case Study of Bicultural Taxpayers’ Tip Reporting Editorial Policy The Impact of the Global Pandemic on Ethics, Professionalism, and Judgment in Accounting and Financial Reporting Data Breach Severity and Debt Market Responses Covers and Front Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1