A coherent biogeographical framework for Old World Neogene and Pleistocene mammals

IF 2.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 PALEONTOLOGY Palaeontology Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1111/pala.12594
Corentin Gibert, Axelle Zacaï, F. Fluteau, G. Ramstein, O. Chavasseau, G. Thiery, Antoine Souron, William E. Banks, F. Guy, D. Barboni, P. Sepulchre, C. Blondel, G. Merceron, O. Otero
{"title":"A coherent biogeographical framework for Old World Neogene and Pleistocene mammals","authors":"Corentin Gibert, Axelle Zacaï, F. Fluteau, G. Ramstein, O. Chavasseau, G. Thiery, Antoine Souron, William E. Banks, F. Guy, D. Barboni, P. Sepulchre, C. Blondel, G. Merceron, O. Otero","doi":"10.1111/pala.12594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to understand mammalian evolution and compute a wide range of biodiversity indices, we commonly use the ‘bioregion’, a spatial division adapted to ecological and evolutionary constraints. While commonly conducted by neontologists, the establishment of bioregions in palaeontology is generally a secondary analysis, shaped on subjective time scales and areas specific to the investigated questions and groups. This heterogeneity, coupled with the scale‐dependency of biodiversity indices, prevents the clear identification of macroecological and macroevolutionary trends for large taxonomic groups like extinct mammals. Here we tackle this issue by providing a coherent framework for Neogene and Pleistocene mammals of the Old World following two steps: (1) a temporal scale adapted to mammalian evolutionary history (i.e. evolutionary fauna) is defined by poly‐cohort analysis; (2) bioregions are then computed for each evolutionary fauna by clustering, ordination and intermediate approaches at multiples spatial scales (i.e. continental to regional) for Eurasia and Africa. Additionally, providing a coherent framework for a wide range of mammalian datasets, our results show: (1) the synchronous emergence and fall of five mammalian evolutionary faunas identified at chronological scales varying from the epoch to the geological stage; (2) a transition from a longitudinal to a latitudinal biogeographical structuring between the Miocene and Pliocene, especially in Europe; (3) the long‐term affinity of southern Asian with African faunas, in sharp contrast with the modern Palaearctic bioregion extension; and (4) the establishment of a vast Mediterranean bioregion from fragmented areas in the Late Miocene to its full extent in the Pleistocene.","PeriodicalId":56272,"journal":{"name":"Palaeontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palaeontology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12594","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to understand mammalian evolution and compute a wide range of biodiversity indices, we commonly use the ‘bioregion’, a spatial division adapted to ecological and evolutionary constraints. While commonly conducted by neontologists, the establishment of bioregions in palaeontology is generally a secondary analysis, shaped on subjective time scales and areas specific to the investigated questions and groups. This heterogeneity, coupled with the scale‐dependency of biodiversity indices, prevents the clear identification of macroecological and macroevolutionary trends for large taxonomic groups like extinct mammals. Here we tackle this issue by providing a coherent framework for Neogene and Pleistocene mammals of the Old World following two steps: (1) a temporal scale adapted to mammalian evolutionary history (i.e. evolutionary fauna) is defined by poly‐cohort analysis; (2) bioregions are then computed for each evolutionary fauna by clustering, ordination and intermediate approaches at multiples spatial scales (i.e. continental to regional) for Eurasia and Africa. Additionally, providing a coherent framework for a wide range of mammalian datasets, our results show: (1) the synchronous emergence and fall of five mammalian evolutionary faunas identified at chronological scales varying from the epoch to the geological stage; (2) a transition from a longitudinal to a latitudinal biogeographical structuring between the Miocene and Pliocene, especially in Europe; (3) the long‐term affinity of southern Asian with African faunas, in sharp contrast with the modern Palaearctic bioregion extension; and (4) the establishment of a vast Mediterranean bioregion from fragmented areas in the Late Miocene to its full extent in the Pleistocene.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旧大陆新近纪和更新世哺乳动物的连贯生物地理框架
为了了解哺乳动物的进化并计算广泛的生物多样性指数,我们通常使用“生物区域”,这是一种适应生态和进化约束的空间划分。虽然通常由新生物学家进行,但古生物学中生物区域的建立通常是一种二次分析,以主观的时间尺度和特定于所调查问题和群体的区域为基础。这种异质性,加上生物多样性指数的规模依赖性,阻碍了对已灭绝哺乳动物等大型分类学群体的宏观生态和宏观进化趋势的明确识别。在这里,我们通过以下两个步骤为旧大陆的新近纪和更新世哺乳动物提供一个连贯的框架来解决这个问题:(1)通过多队列分析来定义适应哺乳动物进化史的时间尺度(即进化动物群);(2) 然后,通过聚类、排序和中间方法,在欧亚大陆和非洲的多个空间尺度(即大陆到区域)上计算每个进化动物的生物区域。此外,我们的研究结果为广泛的哺乳动物数据集提供了一个连贯的框架,表明:(1)在从时代到地质阶段的时间尺度上,发现了五种哺乳动物进化动物群的同步出现和衰落;(2) 中新世和上新世之间从纵向到横向的生物地理结构转变,尤其是在欧洲;(3) 南亚与非洲动物群的长期亲缘关系,与现代古北界生物区系的扩展形成鲜明对比;以及(4)从中新世晚期的碎片区域到更新世的完整区域,建立了一个巨大的地中海生物区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palaeontology
Palaeontology 地学-古生物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Palaeontology publishes a wide variety of papers on palaeontological topics covering: palaeozoology palaeobotany systematic studies palaeoecology micropalaeontology palaeobiogeography functional morphology stratigraphy taxonomy taphonomy palaeoenvironmental reconstruction palaeoclimate analysis and biomineralization studies.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the macroevolutionary impact of ecosystem engineers using an individual‐based eco‐evolutionary simulation New evidence for five cephalic appendages in trilobites and implications for segmentation of the trilobite head The palaeobiological significance of clustering in acritarchs: a case study from the early Cambrian of North Greenland Impact of environmental barriers on temnospondyl biogeography and dispersal during the Middle–Late Triassic Priapulid neoichnology, ecosystem engineering, and the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1