A “hybrid offensive” in the Balkans? Russia and the EU-led Kosovo-Serb negotiations

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES European Security Pub Date : 2021-07-14 DOI:10.1080/09662839.2021.1948837
Lance Davies
{"title":"A “hybrid offensive” in the Balkans? Russia and the EU-led Kosovo-Serb negotiations","authors":"Lance Davies","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1948837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recent analysis has interpreted Russia’s approach to the EU-led dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia through the lens of its actions in Ukraine. This has been characterised as “hybrid warfare” designed to disrupt the negotiations to prevent the integration of the Balkans into Western institutions. This article examines whether Russian actions in Ukraine have signalled a recalibration of Russia’s response to the Kosovo issue based on a repudiation of the EU-led dialogue. This article argues that while Russia’s behaviour has been shaped by its growing competition with the Western powers, its approach has been ambiguous and driven by a range of humanitarian, legal and security-based arguments rooted in the context of the Kosovo problem. These arguments have emerged as important trends in Russia’s behaviour and can be traced to its response to the Kosovo conflict in 1999. This article shows that there has not been a complete recalibration in Russia’s policy towards the dialogue. Russia’s approach has shown both continuity with these trends and a growing politicisation accelerated by the sharp decline in Russia’s relations with the West since 2014. In a broader sense, this article questions the intent and form of Russia’s actions in Ukraine as an explanatory framework for Russia’s behaviour elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09662839.2021.1948837","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Security","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1948837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent analysis has interpreted Russia’s approach to the EU-led dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia through the lens of its actions in Ukraine. This has been characterised as “hybrid warfare” designed to disrupt the negotiations to prevent the integration of the Balkans into Western institutions. This article examines whether Russian actions in Ukraine have signalled a recalibration of Russia’s response to the Kosovo issue based on a repudiation of the EU-led dialogue. This article argues that while Russia’s behaviour has been shaped by its growing competition with the Western powers, its approach has been ambiguous and driven by a range of humanitarian, legal and security-based arguments rooted in the context of the Kosovo problem. These arguments have emerged as important trends in Russia’s behaviour and can be traced to its response to the Kosovo conflict in 1999. This article shows that there has not been a complete recalibration in Russia’s policy towards the dialogue. Russia’s approach has shown both continuity with these trends and a growing politicisation accelerated by the sharp decline in Russia’s relations with the West since 2014. In a broader sense, this article questions the intent and form of Russia’s actions in Ukraine as an explanatory framework for Russia’s behaviour elsewhere.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在巴尔干半岛发动“混合攻势”?俄罗斯和欧盟领导的科索沃-塞尔维亚谈判
摘要最近的分析通过俄罗斯在乌克兰的行动来解读俄罗斯对欧盟领导的科索沃和塞尔维亚对话的态度。这被描述为“混合战争”,旨在破坏谈判,阻止巴尔干半岛融入西方机构。这篇文章探讨了俄罗斯在乌克兰的行动是否标志着俄罗斯在否定欧盟领导的对话的基础上重新调整了对科索沃问题的反应。这篇文章认为,尽管俄罗斯的行为是由其与西方大国日益激烈的竞争所决定的,但其做法是模棱两可的,并受到植根于科索沃问题背景下的一系列基于人道主义、法律和安全的论点的驱动。这些论点已成为俄罗斯行为的重要趋势,可以追溯到俄罗斯对1999年科索沃冲突的反应。这篇文章表明,俄罗斯对对话的政策尚未完全调整。俄罗斯的做法既显示出与这些趋势的连续性,也显示出自2014年以来俄罗斯与西方关系的急剧下降加速了日益严重的政治化。从更广泛的意义上讲,本文质疑俄罗斯在乌克兰行动的意图和形式,以此作为俄罗斯在其他地方行为的解释框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Security
European Security Multiple-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The European Union's use of contractors in security and defence: blazing its own path of institutional change? Measuring the effectiveness of counter-disinformation strategies in the Czech security forces Diplomacy beyond the state: Ukrainian think tank experts as wartime diplomacy actors What can European security architecture look like in the wake of Russia’s war on Ukraine? New Russian migrants in Estonia: performative agency in insecure times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1