Physiological gait test

Lorean Pantaleon, A. Fukushima, N. Moreira, Leonardo Ribeiro De-Paula, G. Ribeiro, Juliana Weckx Peña-Muñoz, Beatriz do Prado Paca Faria, Marcelo Mendonça, G. R. Abreu, Júlia Zacarelli-Magalhães, Jan Carlos Bertassoni Delorenzi, Paula A. Faria Waziry, H. S. Spinosa, E. Ricci
{"title":"Physiological gait test","authors":"Lorean Pantaleon, A. Fukushima, N. Moreira, Leonardo Ribeiro De-Paula, G. Ribeiro, Juliana Weckx Peña-Muñoz, Beatriz do Prado Paca Faria, Marcelo Mendonça, G. R. Abreu, Júlia Zacarelli-Magalhães, Jan Carlos Bertassoni Delorenzi, Paula A. Faria Waziry, H. S. Spinosa, E. Ricci","doi":"10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2023.205091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of animal locomotor activity is a behavioral tool widely used to measure the mechanisms underlying a particular disease, disorder, or injury, as well as the effects of exposure to a xenobiotic. The elevated beam test is one of the most used tests in rodents to assess balance and motor coordination. Despite being inexpensive and utilizing a simple apparatus, the high beam test requires a long period of animal training and habituation. The development and characterization of an alternative test, namely the gait test, has the potential to circumvent the time and effort required for animal training, deeming it an effective, inexpensive, and fast method for the analysis of behaviors that are comparably assessed by the high beam test. Therefore, the present study focused on determining the effectiveness and feasibility of the gait test for assessing rodent locomotion and balance as a replacement for the elevated beam test. For this purpose, male rats were divided into three groups: one control group exposed to a saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) and two experimental groups exposed to a single dose of either 0.2 or 1.0 mg/kg of ivermectin intraperitoneally for induction of locomotor disturbance. The high beam and gait tests were performed 15 min and 24 h after drug administration. Results show that the experimental groups had difficulty performing the tasks of either test at both time points analyzed compared to the control groups. At the high beam, experimental animals had trouble maintaining balance and walking. At the gait test, experimental animals showed alterations in gait, which were quantitated by: (a) shortening of step length, (b) decrease of stride, (c) altered step symmetry, and (d) altered stride area. Such results are indicative of compensatory efforts and were comparable between both tests. Altogether, the data indicate that the gait test meets all requirements for assessing motor coordination in rodents. The gait test is therefore validated as a complement to the elevated beam test for the study and analysis of neurodegenerative impairment and other disorders involving neuromuscular disturbances. ","PeriodicalId":9119,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2023.205091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The evaluation of animal locomotor activity is a behavioral tool widely used to measure the mechanisms underlying a particular disease, disorder, or injury, as well as the effects of exposure to a xenobiotic. The elevated beam test is one of the most used tests in rodents to assess balance and motor coordination. Despite being inexpensive and utilizing a simple apparatus, the high beam test requires a long period of animal training and habituation. The development and characterization of an alternative test, namely the gait test, has the potential to circumvent the time and effort required for animal training, deeming it an effective, inexpensive, and fast method for the analysis of behaviors that are comparably assessed by the high beam test. Therefore, the present study focused on determining the effectiveness and feasibility of the gait test for assessing rodent locomotion and balance as a replacement for the elevated beam test. For this purpose, male rats were divided into three groups: one control group exposed to a saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) and two experimental groups exposed to a single dose of either 0.2 or 1.0 mg/kg of ivermectin intraperitoneally for induction of locomotor disturbance. The high beam and gait tests were performed 15 min and 24 h after drug administration. Results show that the experimental groups had difficulty performing the tasks of either test at both time points analyzed compared to the control groups. At the high beam, experimental animals had trouble maintaining balance and walking. At the gait test, experimental animals showed alterations in gait, which were quantitated by: (a) shortening of step length, (b) decrease of stride, (c) altered step symmetry, and (d) altered stride area. Such results are indicative of compensatory efforts and were comparable between both tests. Altogether, the data indicate that the gait test meets all requirements for assessing motor coordination in rodents. The gait test is therefore validated as a complement to the elevated beam test for the study and analysis of neurodegenerative impairment and other disorders involving neuromuscular disturbances. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生理步态测试
动物运动活性评估是一种行为工具,广泛用于测量特定疾病、障碍或损伤的潜在机制,以及暴露于外源性生物的影响。高架梁试验是啮齿类动物中最常用的评估平衡和运动协调性的试验之一。尽管远光灯测试价格低廉且使用简单,但它需要长时间的动物训练和习惯化。另一种测试的开发和表征,即步态测试,有可能避免动物训练所需的时间和精力,认为它是一种有效、廉价、快速的方法,可以分析远光灯测试可比较评估的行为。因此,本研究的重点是确定步态测试的有效性和可行性,以评估啮齿动物的运动和平衡,取代高架梁测试。为此,雄性大鼠被分为三组:一个对照组暴露于生理盐水(NaCl 0.9%),两个实验组暴露于腹膜内单剂量0.2或1.0 mg/kg的伊维菌素,以诱导运动障碍。在给药后15分钟和24小时进行远光灯和步态测试。结果表明,与对照组相比,实验组在分析的两个时间点都难以完成任何一项测试的任务。在远光灯下,实验动物很难保持平衡和行走。在步态测试中,实验动物表现出步态的变化,通过以下方式进行定量:(a)步长缩短,(b)步幅减小,(c)步幅对称性改变,以及(d)步幅面积改变。这些结果表明了补偿努力,并且在两种测试之间具有可比性。总之,数据表明步态测试符合评估啮齿动物运动协调性的所有要求。因此,步态测试被验证为高架梁测试的补充,用于研究和分析神经退行性损伤和其他涉及神经肌肉紊乱的疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to publish full articles, preliminary notes and review articles in the fields of veterinary medicine, animal science and allied sciences, prepared by national and / or foreign, provided that meet the editorial standards
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Ultrasonographic aspects of the gallbladder mucocele in 30 dogs: retrospective study A systematic review of tetracycline resistance genes in animals and derived products in Latin America and the Caribbean Anesthetic protocol using propofol and isoflurane in spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus) Co-infection of Cytauxzoon felis, Mycoplasma haemofelis, and the feline immunodeficiency virus in a domestic cat in Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil Seroprevalence anti-Leptospira spp. antibodies and the risk factors in cattle of the tropical savannah of eastern Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1