Temple and Tartan: psalms, poetry, and Scotland

K. Wills
{"title":"Temple and Tartan: psalms, poetry, and Scotland","authors":"K. Wills","doi":"10.1080/1474225X.2023.2223425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"on humanity’ (204–5). Asserting the importance of independent human review/intervention in algorithmic decision-making systems is indeed crucial as is retaining moral accountability of designers and users in autonomous systems. Peckham does, however adopt a rather extreme position (based on earlier discussion) that ‘digital surveillance of citizens is a breach of privacy and freedom and should be banned’ (205). This fails to recognise that privacy is never an absolute right. In law there are justifiable grounds for surveillance such as for national security or where an offence is suspected. It is not a ‘breach of privacy’ to be subject to surveillance systems in contexts where children or vulnerable adults are receiving care. A much more developed theological understanding of privacy and of freedom would have led to stronger conclusions. Peckham’s book articulates highly pertinent concerns around AI but his biblical and theological hermeneutics are insufficiently developed to adequately underpin and drive home his conclusions. Readers who identify with Peckham’s concern for ‘what the Bible teaches’ (xiii) from within the broadly Protestant Evangelical perspective will find useful supplementary reading in, for example, Albert Borgmann’s Power Failure: Christianity in the Culture of Technology (Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2003) or Brian Brock’s Christian Ethics in a Technological Age (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2010).","PeriodicalId":42198,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church","volume":"23 1","pages":"293 - 295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1474225X.2023.2223425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

on humanity’ (204–5). Asserting the importance of independent human review/intervention in algorithmic decision-making systems is indeed crucial as is retaining moral accountability of designers and users in autonomous systems. Peckham does, however adopt a rather extreme position (based on earlier discussion) that ‘digital surveillance of citizens is a breach of privacy and freedom and should be banned’ (205). This fails to recognise that privacy is never an absolute right. In law there are justifiable grounds for surveillance such as for national security or where an offence is suspected. It is not a ‘breach of privacy’ to be subject to surveillance systems in contexts where children or vulnerable adults are receiving care. A much more developed theological understanding of privacy and of freedom would have led to stronger conclusions. Peckham’s book articulates highly pertinent concerns around AI but his biblical and theological hermeneutics are insufficiently developed to adequately underpin and drive home his conclusions. Readers who identify with Peckham’s concern for ‘what the Bible teaches’ (xiii) from within the broadly Protestant Evangelical perspective will find useful supplementary reading in, for example, Albert Borgmann’s Power Failure: Christianity in the Culture of Technology (Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2003) or Brian Brock’s Christian Ethics in a Technological Age (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2010).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神庙与格子呢:诗篇、诗歌与苏格兰
关于人类”(204-5)。断言独立的人工审查/干预在算法决策系统中的重要性确实至关重要,在自治系统中保持设计者和用户的道德责任也是如此。然而,佩卡姆确实采取了一种相当极端的立场(基于之前的讨论),即“对公民的数字监控侵犯了隐私和自由,应该被禁止”(205)。这并没有认识到隐私从来都不是一项绝对的权利。在法律上,有正当理由进行监视,例如为了国家安全或涉嫌犯罪。在儿童或弱势成年人接受护理的情况下,接受监控系统的监控并不是“侵犯隐私”。对隐私和自由的神学理解要发展得多,就会得出更有力的结论。佩卡姆的书阐述了对人工智能的高度关注,但他的圣经和神学解释学还不够成熟,无法充分支撑和推动他的结论。从广泛的新教福音派角度来看,认同佩卡姆对“圣经教导”(xiii)的关注的读者会发现,例如,阿尔伯特·伯格曼(Albert Borgmann)的《权力的失败:技术文化中的基督教》(Grand Rapids,MI:Brazos Press,2003)或布莱恩·布洛克(Brian Brock)的《技术时代的基督教伦理》(GrandRapids,MI:Eerdmans,2010)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Nation, sacrifice and Protestant church in China The promised dawn The promised dawn , by Robert A. Gillies with David A. Stout, Haddington, Scotland, Handsel Press, 2023, 128 pp., £10.95 (paperback), ISBN 978-1-912052-82-0 ‘We are Scottish nationalist and Catholic’: Death’s Bright Shadow and Catholic literary nationalism Christian nationalism in post-apartheid South Africa: from the white broederbond to the transracial Neo/Pentecostals What does it mean to be a Christian nationalist in Meiji Japan?: Religion, nationalism and the state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1