Optimizing older adult co-researchers’ involvement in PAR: proposed evaluation tool

IF 0.8 Q4 GERONTOLOGY Quality in Ageing and Older Adults Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI:10.1108/qaoa-12-2021-0092
Émilie Raymond, Christopher W. Tremblay, Jean-Guy Lebel
{"title":"Optimizing older adult co-researchers’ involvement in PAR: proposed evaluation tool","authors":"Émilie Raymond, Christopher W. Tremblay, Jean-Guy Lebel","doi":"10.1108/qaoa-12-2021-0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to share a practical evaluation tool intended to guide and support the participation of older people in PAR projects. Participatory action research (PAR) studies with older adults have been increasing over the past ten years. Scientific evidence provides key principles for PAR projects to achieve meaningful participation by older people; however, respecting the ideals of PAR is not always straightforward.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper presents a case study that evaluated the involvement of nonacademic researchers in a PAR project using an evaluation tool derived from a literature review of PAR undertaken with this population (Corrado et al., 2020). The study goals were first to assess the assets and limits of the older co-researchers’ participation within the PAR project, and second to provide a revised version of the evaluation tool to support future PAR with older people. First, the authors designed an evaluation tool for nonacademic participation in PAR studies by older people that covers three main themes: older people positioned as prominent research partners; symmetrical power relations between academic and nonacademic researchers; and commitment regarding inclusiveness and long-term collaboration. Second, the authors performed an evaluation using this tool within the Active Aging with Dignity PAR Project.\n\n\nFindings\nThird, the authors used the results of this experiment to suggest improvements for an enhanced version of the evaluation tool aiming at supporting fuller involvement of older nonacademic researchers in PAR studies.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the authors’ knowledge, this evaluative tool is a methodological innovation in gerontology.\n","PeriodicalId":44916,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-12-2021-0092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to share a practical evaluation tool intended to guide and support the participation of older people in PAR projects. Participatory action research (PAR) studies with older adults have been increasing over the past ten years. Scientific evidence provides key principles for PAR projects to achieve meaningful participation by older people; however, respecting the ideals of PAR is not always straightforward. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a case study that evaluated the involvement of nonacademic researchers in a PAR project using an evaluation tool derived from a literature review of PAR undertaken with this population (Corrado et al., 2020). The study goals were first to assess the assets and limits of the older co-researchers’ participation within the PAR project, and second to provide a revised version of the evaluation tool to support future PAR with older people. First, the authors designed an evaluation tool for nonacademic participation in PAR studies by older people that covers three main themes: older people positioned as prominent research partners; symmetrical power relations between academic and nonacademic researchers; and commitment regarding inclusiveness and long-term collaboration. Second, the authors performed an evaluation using this tool within the Active Aging with Dignity PAR Project. Findings Third, the authors used the results of this experiment to suggest improvements for an enhanced version of the evaluation tool aiming at supporting fuller involvement of older nonacademic researchers in PAR studies. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this evaluative tool is a methodological innovation in gerontology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化老年同事参与标准杆数:拟议的评估工具
目的本文旨在分享一种实用的评估工具,旨在指导和支持老年人参与标准杆数项目。在过去的十年中,对老年人的参与性行动研究(标准杆数)不断增加 年。科学证据为标准杆数项目提供了关键原则,以实现老年人有意义的参与;然而,尊重标准杆数的理想并不总是直截了当的。设计/方法论/方法本文提出了一个案例研究,该研究使用来自对该人群进行的标准杆数文献综述的评估工具,评估了非学术研究人员参与标准杆数项目的情况(Corrado et al.,2020)。研究目标首先是评估老年同事参与标准杆数项目的资产和限制,其次是提供评估工具的修订版本,以支持老年人未来的标准杆数。首先,作者为老年人非学术参与标准杆数研究设计了一个评估工具,涵盖三个主要主题:老年人被定位为突出的研究伙伴;学术与非学术研究者之间的对称权力关系;以及对包容性和长期合作的承诺。第二,作者在具有尊严的活跃老龄化标准杆数项目中使用该工具进行了评估。第三,作者使用该实验的结果建议改进评估工具的增强版本,旨在支持老年非学术研究人员更充分地参与标准杆数研究。原创性/价值据作者所知,这种评估工具是老年学的一种方法创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Involving older adults and unpaid carers in the research cycle: reflections on implementing the UK national standards for public involvement into practice The relationship between older adults’ perceptions of ageing and depression: a systematic review Participatory action research and empowerment of nursing home residents Cognitive functioning and life satisfaction as predictors of subjective health complaints in elderly people Editorial: Recognising new partners and activities in older peoples’ care but also potential burdens in new forms of care and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1