{"title":"Universals and diversity in gesture","authors":"Kensy Cooperrider","doi":"10.1075/gest.19011.coo","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n At the dawn of anthropology, gesture was widely considered a “universal language”. In the 20th century, however,\n this framing fell out of favor as anthropologists rejected universalism in favor of relativism. These polemical positions were\n largely fueled by high-flying rhetoric and second-hand report; researchers had neither the data nor the conceptual frameworks to\n stake out substantive positions. Today we have much more data, but our frameworks remain underdeveloped and often implicit. Here,\n I outline several emerging conceptual tools that help us make sense of universals and diversity in gesture. I then sketch the\n state of our knowledge about a handful of gestural phenomena, further developing these conceptual tools on the way. This brief\n survey underscores a clear conclusion: gesture is unmistakably similar around the world while also being broadly diverse. Our task\n ahead is to put polemics aside and explore this duality systematically – and soon, before gestural diversity dwindles further.","PeriodicalId":35125,"journal":{"name":"Gesture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.19011.coo","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
At the dawn of anthropology, gesture was widely considered a “universal language”. In the 20th century, however,
this framing fell out of favor as anthropologists rejected universalism in favor of relativism. These polemical positions were
largely fueled by high-flying rhetoric and second-hand report; researchers had neither the data nor the conceptual frameworks to
stake out substantive positions. Today we have much more data, but our frameworks remain underdeveloped and often implicit. Here,
I outline several emerging conceptual tools that help us make sense of universals and diversity in gesture. I then sketch the
state of our knowledge about a handful of gestural phenomena, further developing these conceptual tools on the way. This brief
survey underscores a clear conclusion: gesture is unmistakably similar around the world while also being broadly diverse. Our task
ahead is to put polemics aside and explore this duality systematically – and soon, before gestural diversity dwindles further.
期刊介绍:
Gesture publishes articles reporting original research, as well as survey and review articles, on all aspects of gesture. The journal aims to stimulate and facilitate scholarly communication between the different disciplines within which work on gesture is conducted. For this reason papers written in the spirit of cooperation between disciplines are especially encouraged. Topics may include, but are by no means limited to: the relationship between gesture and speech; the role gesture may play in communication in all the circumstances of social interaction, including conversations, the work-place or instructional settings; gesture and cognition; the development of gesture in children.