Cross-cultural realist interviews: An integration of the realist interview and cross-cultural qualitative research methods

Q2 Social Sciences Evaluation Journal of Australasia Pub Date : 2021-12-05 DOI:10.1177/1035719X211055229
K. O'Rourke, N. Abdulghani, J. Yelland, M. Newton, T. Shafiei
{"title":"Cross-cultural realist interviews: An integration of the realist interview and cross-cultural qualitative research methods","authors":"K. O'Rourke, N. Abdulghani, J. Yelland, M. Newton, T. Shafiei","doi":"10.1177/1035719X211055229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Realist interviews are a data collection method used in realist evaluations. There is little available guidance for realist interviewing in cross-cultural contexts. Few published realist evaluations have included cross-cultural interviews, providing limited analyses of the cross-cultural application of realist methodology. This study integrated realist and cross-cultural qualitative methods in a realist evaluation of an Australian doula support program. The interviews were conducted with Arabic speaking clients of the program. The process included collaboration with a bicultural researcher, philosophically situating the study for methodologically coherent integration, bicultural review of the appropriateness of realist ‘how’ and ‘why’ questions, decisions about language translation and interpretation, pilot interviews, and co-facilitation of the interviews. Integration of the methods was feasible and valuable. This study may support other realist evaluators to give voice to people from culturally diverse groups, in a manner that is culturally safe, methodologically coherent and rigorous, and that produces trustworthy results.","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"22 1","pages":"5 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X211055229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Realist interviews are a data collection method used in realist evaluations. There is little available guidance for realist interviewing in cross-cultural contexts. Few published realist evaluations have included cross-cultural interviews, providing limited analyses of the cross-cultural application of realist methodology. This study integrated realist and cross-cultural qualitative methods in a realist evaluation of an Australian doula support program. The interviews were conducted with Arabic speaking clients of the program. The process included collaboration with a bicultural researcher, philosophically situating the study for methodologically coherent integration, bicultural review of the appropriateness of realist ‘how’ and ‘why’ questions, decisions about language translation and interpretation, pilot interviews, and co-facilitation of the interviews. Integration of the methods was feasible and valuable. This study may support other realist evaluators to give voice to people from culturally diverse groups, in a manner that is culturally safe, methodologically coherent and rigorous, and that produces trustworthy results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨文化现实主义访谈:现实主义访谈与跨文化定性研究方法的结合
现实主义访谈是一种用于现实主义评价的数据收集方法。在跨文化背景下,现实主义面试几乎没有可用的指导。发表的现实主义评价很少包括跨文化访谈,对现实主义方法论的跨文化应用进行了有限的分析。本研究将现实主义和跨文化定性方法相结合,对澳大利亚杜拉支持计划进行了现实主义评估。采访对象是该项目的阿拉伯语客户。这一过程包括与一位双文化研究人员合作,从哲学角度对研究进行定位,以实现方法上的连贯整合,对现实主义“如何”和“为什么”问题的适当性进行双文化审查,就语言翻译和口译做出决定,试点访谈,以及共同促成访谈。整合这些方法是可行的,也是有价值的。这项研究可能支持其他现实主义评估者以文化安全、方法连贯和严格的方式,为来自不同文化群体的人发声,并产生值得信赖的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
Evaluation Journal of Australasia Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Utilising existing data for a pilot social return on investment analysis of the family wellbeing empowerment program: A justification and framework Evaluation at the cutting edge: Driving innovation and quality The best medicine: Lessons from health for policy randomistas Evaluator perspective: Meet an Australian Evaluation Society Fellow – Nan Wehipeihana Meta-evaluation: Validating program evaluation standards through the United Nations Evaluation Quality Assessment (EQAs)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1