Prostitution in America’s industrial and progressive eras: a “dirty work” perspective on creating positive self-identities

IF 0.9 Q4 MANAGEMENT Journal of Management History Pub Date : 2023-04-21 DOI:10.1108/jmh-10-2022-0060
Nancy E. Day
{"title":"Prostitution in America’s industrial and progressive eras: a “dirty work” perspective on creating positive self-identities","authors":"Nancy E. Day","doi":"10.1108/jmh-10-2022-0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDirty workers occupy jobs and perform tasks that are unpleasant and considered distasteful or “tainted” to other members of society. However, while they experience challenges in managing stigma, they are generally successful in creating positive self-identities. Among these dirty jobs is prostitution. As dirty workers, women sex workers in American history have been treated with humor, ridicule and derision. This study aims to explain the social contexts and the limited economic choices these women faced and examine how they may have managed their dirty work’s stigma to create positive self-identities.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper uses primary and secondary sources to examine a 53-year period of American history and to frame these women’s stigma management within a “dirty work” perspective.\n\n\nFindings\nThe author suggests that sex workers in riskier roles (e.g. street walkers, crib workers or “upstairs girls” in saloons) would have been less able to effectively manage stigma and create positive self-identities as compared to brothels workers, due to the brothel’s strong social support, healthier work culture and richer resources.\n\n\nSocial implications\nWhile sex work has changed significantly in the past century, the principles of identity management in this difficult and dirty work remain. Understanding the economic, social and individual challenges faced by these dirty workers will aid our understanding of the difficulties confronted by today’s sex workers.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nSex work is nearly absent from scholarly management literature. The lack of historical perspective and knowledge in this field limits a full understanding of how various types of dirty workers manage stigma.\n","PeriodicalId":45819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-10-2022-0060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Dirty workers occupy jobs and perform tasks that are unpleasant and considered distasteful or “tainted” to other members of society. However, while they experience challenges in managing stigma, they are generally successful in creating positive self-identities. Among these dirty jobs is prostitution. As dirty workers, women sex workers in American history have been treated with humor, ridicule and derision. This study aims to explain the social contexts and the limited economic choices these women faced and examine how they may have managed their dirty work’s stigma to create positive self-identities. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses primary and secondary sources to examine a 53-year period of American history and to frame these women’s stigma management within a “dirty work” perspective. Findings The author suggests that sex workers in riskier roles (e.g. street walkers, crib workers or “upstairs girls” in saloons) would have been less able to effectively manage stigma and create positive self-identities as compared to brothels workers, due to the brothel’s strong social support, healthier work culture and richer resources. Social implications While sex work has changed significantly in the past century, the principles of identity management in this difficult and dirty work remain. Understanding the economic, social and individual challenges faced by these dirty workers will aid our understanding of the difficulties confronted by today’s sex workers. Originality/value Sex work is nearly absent from scholarly management literature. The lack of historical perspective and knowledge in this field limits a full understanding of how various types of dirty workers manage stigma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国工业和进步时代的卖淫:创造积极自我认同的“肮脏工作”视角
目的肮脏的工人从事的工作和执行的任务令人不快,被认为是社会其他成员的厌恶或“污点”。然而,尽管他们在管理污名方面遇到了挑战,但他们通常成功地创造了积极的自我认同。卖淫就是这些肮脏的工作之一。作为肮脏的工作者,美国历史上的女性性工作者一直受到幽默、嘲笑和嘲笑。这项研究旨在解释这些女性所面临的社会背景和有限的经济选择,并考察她们是如何管理自己的脏活污名以创造积极的自我认同的。设计/方法/方法本文使用主要和次要来源来考察美国53年的历史,并将这些女性的污名管理纳入“脏活”态度研究结果作者认为,与妓院工作人员相比,担任风险较高角色的性工作者(如街头流浪者、婴儿床工作人员或沙龙的“楼上女孩”)将无法有效管理污名并创造积极的自我认同,因为妓院有强大的社会支持、更健康的工作文化和更丰富的资源。社会含义尽管性工作在过去的一个世纪里发生了重大变化,但在这项困难而肮脏的工作中,身份管理的原则仍然存在。了解这些肮脏工人所面临的经济、社会和个人挑战,将有助于我们理解当今性工作者所面临的困难。学术管理文献中几乎没有性工作。缺乏这一领域的历史视角和知识,限制了对各种类型的肮脏工人如何管理污名的充分理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the intellectual nexus between Peirce’s synechism and Goldratt’s theory of constraints: insights for management and organization studies Back to roots! The singular introduction of statutory auditing in France, Germany and Great Britain (1844–1935) Rooting firm responsibility in social-ecological systems through ancient Nahua thought: rethinking the logic model in the global reporting initiative The troubled establishment of the Tourist Hotel Corporation of New Zealand Boundary spanning activities and resource orchestration as microfoundations of dynamic capability: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1