Left turn across path and opposite direction accidents in China: CIDAS accident study

IF 2.7 4区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Transportation Safety and Environment Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.1093/tse/tdac070
Y. Chen, Christian Buerger, Miao Lin, Xudong Li, Volker Labenski, Haixia Jin, Hai Wang, Yang Liu, Tsuyoshi Ino, Harald Feifel, Tian Tan, Fangrong Chang
{"title":"Left turn across path and opposite direction accidents in China: CIDAS accident study","authors":"Y. Chen, Christian Buerger, Miao Lin, Xudong Li, Volker Labenski, Haixia Jin, Hai Wang, Yang Liu, Tsuyoshi Ino, Harald Feifel, Tian Tan, Fangrong Chang","doi":"10.1093/tse/tdac070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Left Turn Across Path with Opposite Direction (LTAP/OD) conflicts are one of the most common crash types at intersections. The research aims to reveal the general and dynamic information about the conflict for the most relevant street layouts for each conflict configuration of the LTAP/OD accidents involving passenger cars, motorcycles and Ebikes. The analysis was based on 276 LTAP/OD accidents collected by China In-Depth Accident Study (CIDAS 2011–2019). The LTAP/OD accidents include 44 car-to-car conflicts, 157 car-to-motorcycle conflicts and 75 car-to-Ebike conflicts. Most of accidents belonging to three types were observed at the W0 street layout without green belt separating the oncoming lane and no offset lane between the turning car and the oncoming traffic, the main distance between both vehicles in the beginning of the critical situation being about four meters, occurring in the clear day with no rain and at junctions lighted either because of daylight or based on street lighting. In terms of the turning car initial speed, the range is between 15-30 km/h for most car-to-car and car-to-motorcycle accidents but 30-40 km/h for most car-to-Ebike accidents. As for the collision speed, this range is between 10 and 20 km/h for car-to-car and car-to-Ebike accidents and between 10 and 25 km/h for car-to-motorcycle crashes. Based on the distributions of objective motorcycles’ and Ebike's positions in collisions with passenger cars, the maximum longitudinal distance is 60 m for both two types of accidents and the maximum lateral distance ranges from -20 m to 20 m and from -15 m to 15 m, respectively.","PeriodicalId":52804,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Safety and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Safety and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tse/tdac070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Left Turn Across Path with Opposite Direction (LTAP/OD) conflicts are one of the most common crash types at intersections. The research aims to reveal the general and dynamic information about the conflict for the most relevant street layouts for each conflict configuration of the LTAP/OD accidents involving passenger cars, motorcycles and Ebikes. The analysis was based on 276 LTAP/OD accidents collected by China In-Depth Accident Study (CIDAS 2011–2019). The LTAP/OD accidents include 44 car-to-car conflicts, 157 car-to-motorcycle conflicts and 75 car-to-Ebike conflicts. Most of accidents belonging to three types were observed at the W0 street layout without green belt separating the oncoming lane and no offset lane between the turning car and the oncoming traffic, the main distance between both vehicles in the beginning of the critical situation being about four meters, occurring in the clear day with no rain and at junctions lighted either because of daylight or based on street lighting. In terms of the turning car initial speed, the range is between 15-30 km/h for most car-to-car and car-to-motorcycle accidents but 30-40 km/h for most car-to-Ebike accidents. As for the collision speed, this range is between 10 and 20 km/h for car-to-car and car-to-Ebike accidents and between 10 and 25 km/h for car-to-motorcycle crashes. Based on the distributions of objective motorcycles’ and Ebike's positions in collisions with passenger cars, the maximum longitudinal distance is 60 m for both two types of accidents and the maximum lateral distance ranges from -20 m to 20 m and from -15 m to 15 m, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国的左转弯和反方向事故:CIDAS事故研究
反向左转(LTAP/OD)冲突是十字路口最常见的碰撞类型之一。本研究旨在揭示涉及客车、摩托车和电动自行车的LTAP/OD事故的每个冲突配置的最相关街道布局的冲突的一般和动态信息。该分析基于中国深度事故研究(CIDAS 2011-2019)收集的276起LTAP/OD事故。LTAP/OD事故包括44起车与车冲突、157起车与摩托车冲突和75起车与电动自行车冲突。属于三种类型的事故大多发生在W0街道布局上,没有将迎面而来的车道分隔开的绿化带,转弯车辆和迎面而来车辆之间也没有偏移车道,在危急情况开始时,两辆车之间的主要距离约为4米,发生在晴朗无雨的日子里,在因日光或基于街道照明而照明的路口。就转弯汽车的初始速度而言,大多数汽车对汽车和汽车对摩托车事故的速度范围在15-30公里/小时之间,但大多数汽车对电动自行车事故的速度为30-40公里/小时。至于碰撞速度,对于汽车对汽车和汽车对电动自行车的事故,这个范围在10到20公里/小时之间,对于汽车和摩托车的碰撞,这个范围是10到25公里/小时。根据目标摩托车和电动自行车在与客车碰撞中的位置分布,两种事故的最大纵向距离均为60米,最大横向距离分别为-20米至20米和-15米至15米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Safety and Environment
Transportation Safety and Environment TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A maneuver indicator and ensemble learning-based risky driver recognition approach for highway merging areas Unraveling the veil of traffic safety: A comprehensive analysis of factors influencing crash frequency across U.S. States An investigation of ADAS testing scenarios based on vehicle-to-powered two-wheeler accidents occurring in a county-level district in Hunan province Research on intelligent fault diagnosis for railway point machines using deep reinforcement learning A variable time headway model for mixed car-following process considering multiple front vehicles information in foggy weather
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1