Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel, Drug of Choice for the Prevention of Stent Thrombosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
M. Ishaq, Nimra Ashraf, G. Chand, S. Khatti, Abdul Mueed, Ahmed Raheem
{"title":"Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel, Drug of Choice for the Prevention of Stent Thrombosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"M. Ishaq, Nimra Ashraf, G. Chand, S. Khatti, Abdul Mueed, Ahmed Raheem","doi":"10.47144/phj.v56i2.2520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The objective of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was to compare the efficacy of ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel for preventing stent thrombosis (ST) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).\nMethodology: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The inclusion criteria involved selecting randomized controlled trials that included patients with ACS undergoing PCI, comparing the use of ticagrelor and Clopidogrel, having a follow-up period of at least 30 days, and reporting data on ST. The meta-analysis was performed using the R statistical software version 4.1.1, and the \"meta\" package was utilized. The Mantel-Haenszel method was employed to calculate the relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for comparing the risk of ST between the two treatment groups.\nResults: A total of seven randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis, comprising a population of 28,609 patients with ACS who were randomized to receive either ticagrelor or Clopidogrel in a ratio of 12,116:16,493. The cumulative rate of ST was found to be 2.2% (185/8,423) in the ticagrelor group and 2.7% (347/12,851) in the clopidogrel group. The meta-analysis revealed a significant decrease in the rate of ST with ticagrelor compared to Clopidogrel, demonstrating a relative risk of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.85). No heterogeneity was detected among the included studies, as indicated by an I2 value of 0% and a p-value of 0.463.\nConclusion: In conclusion, the findings of this meta-analysis suggest that ticagrelor is a significantly more effective P2Y12 inhibitor than Clopidogrel for preventing ST following PCI in patients with ACS. These results support using ticagrelor as the preferred antiplatelet therapy in this patient population.","PeriodicalId":42273,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47144/phj.v56i2.2520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was to compare the efficacy of ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel for preventing stent thrombosis (ST) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Methodology: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The inclusion criteria involved selecting randomized controlled trials that included patients with ACS undergoing PCI, comparing the use of ticagrelor and Clopidogrel, having a follow-up period of at least 30 days, and reporting data on ST. The meta-analysis was performed using the R statistical software version 4.1.1, and the "meta" package was utilized. The Mantel-Haenszel method was employed to calculate the relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for comparing the risk of ST between the two treatment groups.
Results: A total of seven randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis, comprising a population of 28,609 patients with ACS who were randomized to receive either ticagrelor or Clopidogrel in a ratio of 12,116:16,493. The cumulative rate of ST was found to be 2.2% (185/8,423) in the ticagrelor group and 2.7% (347/12,851) in the clopidogrel group. The meta-analysis revealed a significant decrease in the rate of ST with ticagrelor compared to Clopidogrel, demonstrating a relative risk of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.85). No heterogeneity was detected among the included studies, as indicated by an I2 value of 0% and a p-value of 0.463.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the findings of this meta-analysis suggest that ticagrelor is a significantly more effective P2Y12 inhibitor than Clopidogrel for preventing ST following PCI in patients with ACS. These results support using ticagrelor as the preferred antiplatelet therapy in this patient population.
目的:本随机对照试验荟萃分析的目的是比较替格雷和氯吡格雷预防急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后支架血栓形成(ST)的疗效。方法:使用MEDLINE/PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆进行全面的文献检索。纳入标准包括选择随机对照试验,包括接受PCI的ACS患者,比较替卡格雷和氯吡格雷的使用情况,随访期至少为30天,并报告ST数据。使用R统计软件4.1.1版进行荟萃分析,并使用“meta”包。采用Mantel Haenszel方法计算相对风险(RR)和相应的95%置信区间(CI),以比较两个治疗组之间的ST段风险。结果:共有7项随机对照试验被纳入分析,包括28609名ACS患者,他们被随机接受替格雷或氯吡格雷治疗,比例为12116:16493。替卡格雷组的ST段累积发生率为2.2%(185/8423),氯吡格雷组为2.7%(347/12851)。荟萃分析显示,与氯吡格雷相比,替格雷治疗ST段抬高的发生率显著降低,相对风险为0.71(95%CI:0.59至0.85)。纳入的研究中未发现异质性,I2值为0%,p值为0.463。结论:总之,该荟萃分析的结果表明,替格瑞洛是一种比氯吡格雷更有效的P2Y12抑制剂,可预防ACS患者PCI后ST段。这些结果支持在该患者群体中使用替卡格雷作为首选抗血小板治疗。