B. Tikoff, T. Shipley, E. Nelson, R. Williams, N. Barshi, C. Wilson
{"title":"Improving the Practice of Geology through Explicit Inclusion of Scientific Uncertainty for Data and Models","authors":"B. Tikoff, T. Shipley, E. Nelson, R. Williams, N. Barshi, C. Wilson","doi":"10.1130/gsatg560a.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of geology is poised to make a fundamental transition in the quality, character, and types of science that are possible for practitioners. Geologists are developing data systems—consistent with their workflow—to digitally collect, store, and share data. Separately, geologists and cognitive scientists have been working together to develop tools that can characterize the level of uncertainty of both data and models. The transformational change comes from the simultaneous combination of these two approaches: digital data systems designed to capture and convey scientific uncertainty. This approach promotes better data collection practice, improves reproducibility, and increases trust in community-based digital data. We applied these methods— attending to uncertainty and its incorporation into digital repositories—to the Sage Hen Flat pluton in eastern California, USA, where two published maps provide different interpretations. Incorporating uncertainty into our workflow, from field data collection to publication, allows us to move beyond binary choices (e.g., is this data/ model right or wrong?) to a more nuanced view (e.g., what is my level of uncertainty about the data/model?) that is shareable with the larger community.","PeriodicalId":35784,"journal":{"name":"GSA Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSA Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/gsatg560a.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The field of geology is poised to make a fundamental transition in the quality, character, and types of science that are possible for practitioners. Geologists are developing data systems—consistent with their workflow—to digitally collect, store, and share data. Separately, geologists and cognitive scientists have been working together to develop tools that can characterize the level of uncertainty of both data and models. The transformational change comes from the simultaneous combination of these two approaches: digital data systems designed to capture and convey scientific uncertainty. This approach promotes better data collection practice, improves reproducibility, and increases trust in community-based digital data. We applied these methods— attending to uncertainty and its incorporation into digital repositories—to the Sage Hen Flat pluton in eastern California, USA, where two published maps provide different interpretations. Incorporating uncertainty into our workflow, from field data collection to publication, allows us to move beyond binary choices (e.g., is this data/ model right or wrong?) to a more nuanced view (e.g., what is my level of uncertainty about the data/model?) that is shareable with the larger community.
地质学领域准备在科学的质量、特征和类型上进行根本性的转变,这对从业者来说是可能的。地质学家正在开发与他们的工作流程一致的数据系统,以数字方式收集、存储和共享数据。另外,地质学家和认知科学家一直在合作开发能够表征数据和模型不确定性水平的工具。转型变化来自这两种方法的同时结合:旨在捕捉和传达科学不确定性的数字数据系统。这种方法促进了更好的数据收集实践,提高了再现性,并增加了对社区数字数据的信任。我们将这些方法应用于美国加利福尼亚州东部的Sage Hen Flat岩体,以应对不确定性及其融入数字存储库的问题,在那里,两张已公布的地图提供了不同的解释。将不确定性纳入我们的工作流程,从现场数据收集到发布,使我们能够超越二元选择(例如,这个数据/模型是对是错?),转向更微妙的观点(例如,我对数据/模型的不确定性水平是多少?),与更大的社区共享。