Gendered insecurities: EU practices in countering violent extremism in Niger

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES European Security Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/09662839.2023.2233441
Laura Berlingozzi
{"title":"Gendered insecurities: EU practices in countering violent extremism in Niger","authors":"Laura Berlingozzi","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2023.2233441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT What kind and whose security is the European Union concerned with in its gender practices in countering violent extremism? This article contributes to the scholarship on EU implementation of the Women, Peace and Security agenda and gender in countering violent extremism, highlighting shortcomings in the conceptualisation and practice of women’s participation in the security sphere. Taking Niger as a heuristic case study, the paper explores tensions between local gender norms and EU securitised framing of women’s empowerment and gender equality, arguing that women’s increased participation in the security field is tacitly understood in terms of use-value. Building on feminist postcolonial scholarship, the analysis uncovers how women are included and what expectations they are deriving from their engagement, exposing the neoliberal and neocolonial framings of EU intervention and the misunderstandings of women’s materialities. By ontologically flattening women subjectivities without accounting for their intersectional experiences, both patriarchy and global hierarchies of knowledge production are reiterated. In doing so, the EU co-constructs gendered and racialised subjects, thus reinforcing inequalities, silencing local pluralities, and in many cases, aggravating women’s situation of insecurity in Niger. The analysis employs feminist and ethnographic methods, including semi-structured interviews and participant observation.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Security","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2023.2233441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT What kind and whose security is the European Union concerned with in its gender practices in countering violent extremism? This article contributes to the scholarship on EU implementation of the Women, Peace and Security agenda and gender in countering violent extremism, highlighting shortcomings in the conceptualisation and practice of women’s participation in the security sphere. Taking Niger as a heuristic case study, the paper explores tensions between local gender norms and EU securitised framing of women’s empowerment and gender equality, arguing that women’s increased participation in the security field is tacitly understood in terms of use-value. Building on feminist postcolonial scholarship, the analysis uncovers how women are included and what expectations they are deriving from their engagement, exposing the neoliberal and neocolonial framings of EU intervention and the misunderstandings of women’s materialities. By ontologically flattening women subjectivities without accounting for their intersectional experiences, both patriarchy and global hierarchies of knowledge production are reiterated. In doing so, the EU co-constructs gendered and racialised subjects, thus reinforcing inequalities, silencing local pluralities, and in many cases, aggravating women’s situation of insecurity in Niger. The analysis employs feminist and ethnographic methods, including semi-structured interviews and participant observation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别不安全感:欧盟在尼日尔打击暴力极端主义的做法
摘要:欧盟在打击暴力极端主义的性别实践中关注的是什么样的安全以及谁的安全?这篇文章有助于研究欧盟执行《妇女、和平与安全议程》和打击暴力极端主义中的性别问题,强调妇女参与安全领域的概念和实践方面的不足。本文以尼日尔为启发性案例研究,探讨了当地性别规范与欧盟对妇女赋权和性别平等的证券化框架之间的紧张关系,认为妇女在安全领域的更多参与是从使用价值的角度默认的。在女权主义后殖民学术的基础上,该分析揭示了女性是如何被包括在内的,以及她们从参与中获得了什么期望,暴露了欧盟干预的新自由主义和新殖民主义框架以及对女性物质的误解。通过在不考虑女性交叉经历的情况下从本体论上扁平化女性主体性,父权制和知识生产的全球等级制度都得到了重申。在这样做的过程中,欧盟共同构建了性别化和种族化的主体,从而加剧了不平等,压制了当地的多元化,在许多情况下,加剧了尼日尔妇女的不安全状况。该分析采用了女权主义和人种学方法,包括半结构化访谈和参与者观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Security
European Security Multiple-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The European Union's use of contractors in security and defence: blazing its own path of institutional change? Measuring the effectiveness of counter-disinformation strategies in the Czech security forces Diplomacy beyond the state: Ukrainian think tank experts as wartime diplomacy actors What can European security architecture look like in the wake of Russia’s war on Ukraine? New Russian migrants in Estonia: performative agency in insecure times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1