Concordance between TIRADS and Cytology in Thyroid Nodule

Amin Abolhasani Foroughi, M. Mokhtari, Emad Heidari, Masoume Nazeri, Hemmat Rastgouyan, A. Babaei
{"title":"Concordance between TIRADS and Cytology in Thyroid Nodule","authors":"Amin Abolhasani Foroughi, M. Mokhtari, Emad Heidari, Masoume Nazeri, Hemmat Rastgouyan, A. Babaei","doi":"10.22038/ijorl.2022.61654.3119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Palpable thyroid nodules are stated in 4 to 7% of individuals. This study was designed to evaluate the relation of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) based cytology reports in patients with thyroid nodules. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, individuals with thyroid nodules who were selected for ultrasonographic-guided FNA enrolled in this study. Demographic data, radiologic assessment, and cytology report were gathered based on hospital medical records. TIRADS grading of the nodules was assessed for each nodule. Cytology was performed on all samples. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by comparing cytology with ACR-TIRADS and also cytology with TIRADS 4-5 cut-off point as a radiologic malignant lesion. Results: 172 patients were studied, 151 of whom were female and 21 were male. The mean age of the patients was 49.46 years. Most of the patients had TIRADS 4 (53.5%) followed by 3 (31.4%), and 5 (11.6%). 151 patients (87.8%) had a benign lesion in cytology. Of them, 118 had colloid nodules. There was a statistically significant relation between TIRADS and cytology (p-value<0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and positive and negative predictive value for ACR-TIRADS classification were 76.19%, 47.54%, 0.619, 20.00%, and 92.06%, respectively. These values for cut-off “4-5” classification was 86.36%, 38.00%, 0.622, 16.96%, and 95.00%. Conclusions: According to the significant concordance between TIRADS and cytology, as shown in the results of our study, it seems that TIRADS could be used to decrease the amount of unnecessary FNA in individuals with thyroid nodules.","PeriodicalId":14607,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"34 1","pages":"295 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ijorl.2022.61654.3119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Palpable thyroid nodules are stated in 4 to 7% of individuals. This study was designed to evaluate the relation of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) based cytology reports in patients with thyroid nodules. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, individuals with thyroid nodules who were selected for ultrasonographic-guided FNA enrolled in this study. Demographic data, radiologic assessment, and cytology report were gathered based on hospital medical records. TIRADS grading of the nodules was assessed for each nodule. Cytology was performed on all samples. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by comparing cytology with ACR-TIRADS and also cytology with TIRADS 4-5 cut-off point as a radiologic malignant lesion. Results: 172 patients were studied, 151 of whom were female and 21 were male. The mean age of the patients was 49.46 years. Most of the patients had TIRADS 4 (53.5%) followed by 3 (31.4%), and 5 (11.6%). 151 patients (87.8%) had a benign lesion in cytology. Of them, 118 had colloid nodules. There was a statistically significant relation between TIRADS and cytology (p-value<0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and positive and negative predictive value for ACR-TIRADS classification were 76.19%, 47.54%, 0.619, 20.00%, and 92.06%, respectively. These values for cut-off “4-5” classification was 86.36%, 38.00%, 0.622, 16.96%, and 95.00%. Conclusions: According to the significant concordance between TIRADS and cytology, as shown in the results of our study, it seems that TIRADS could be used to decrease the amount of unnecessary FNA in individuals with thyroid nodules.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺结节TIRADS与细胞学的一致性
引言:4%至7%的人患有可触摸的甲状腺结节。本研究旨在评估甲状腺结节患者甲状腺成像报告和数据系统(TIRADS)与基于细针抽吸(FNA)的细胞学报告的关系。材料和方法:在这项回顾性横断面研究中,选择甲状腺结节患者进行超声引导下的FNA。根据医院医疗记录收集人口统计学数据、放射学评估和细胞学报告。对每个结节的TIRADS分级进行评估。对所有样本进行细胞学检查。通过将细胞学与ACR-TIRADS以及将细胞学与TIRADS 4-5分界点作为放射学恶性病变进行比较来计算敏感性和特异性。结果:共研究172例患者,其中女性151例,男性21例。患者的平均年龄为49.46岁。大多数患者有TIRADS 4例(53.5%),其次是3例(31.4%)和5例(11.6%)。151例(87.8%)患者在细胞学检查中有良性病变。其中胶质结节118例。TIRADS与细胞学之间存在统计学意义(p值<0.001)。ACR-TIRADS分类的敏感性、特异性、AUC以及阳性和阴性预测值分别为76.19%、47.54%、0.619、20.00%和92.06%。“4-5”分型的临界值分别为86.36%、38.00%、0.622、16.96%和95.00%。结论:根据TIRAD与细胞学的显著一致性,如我们的研究结果所示,TIRAD似乎可以用于减少甲状腺结节患者不必要的FNA量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Performance of Wrist-Worn Pulse Oximeter for the Screening of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Submandibular Gland Preservation in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinomas: Our Analysis at A Tertiary Care Hospital. Transnasal Endoscopic Injection of Botulinum Toxin in Patients with Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia. Evaluation of Dentofacial Angles in Children with Severe Adenoid Hypertrophy. Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa Associated Laryngeal Stenosis: A Case Report and Review of Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1