The Perceived Problems of People With Subclinical Personality Disorders: A Mental Health Literacy Study

Q3 Psychology Journal of Relationships Research Pub Date : 2017-07-13 DOI:10.1017/jrr.2017.3
A. Furnham, Kelly Petropoulou
{"title":"The Perceived Problems of People With Subclinical Personality Disorders: A Mental Health Literacy Study","authors":"A. Furnham, Kelly Petropoulou","doi":"10.1017/jrr.2017.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study looked at lay theories of how people with personality disorders (PDs) are perceived to cope with their interpersonal relationships. In all, 213 participants read 14 vignettes derived from Oldham's and Morris's (2000) book describing DSM III personality disorders for a popular audience. Participants were invited to do six ratings, including how happy each person in each vignette appeared to be and how successful at establishing long-term relationships. Effect sizes for each question across the 14 vignettes were small to medium. The six ratings factored into a single social adjustment scale, and there were many differences across the PDs on this measure. Those with dependent PD were judged as most successful in their social relationships while those who were schizoid PD were judged as least successful. A similar analysis using the three higher order clusters showed significant differences: Cluster C disordered people were judged as better adjusted than Cluster A people. Limitations of the methodology and implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":37757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Relationships Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jrr.2017.3","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Relationships Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2017.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study looked at lay theories of how people with personality disorders (PDs) are perceived to cope with their interpersonal relationships. In all, 213 participants read 14 vignettes derived from Oldham's and Morris's (2000) book describing DSM III personality disorders for a popular audience. Participants were invited to do six ratings, including how happy each person in each vignette appeared to be and how successful at establishing long-term relationships. Effect sizes for each question across the 14 vignettes were small to medium. The six ratings factored into a single social adjustment scale, and there were many differences across the PDs on this measure. Those with dependent PD were judged as most successful in their social relationships while those who were schizoid PD were judged as least successful. A similar analysis using the three higher order clusters showed significant differences: Cluster C disordered people were judged as better adjusted than Cluster A people. Limitations of the methodology and implications are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚临床人格障碍患者感知问题的心理健康素养研究
这项研究着眼于人格障碍患者如何处理人际关系的外行理论。总共有213名参与者为受欢迎的观众阅读了奥尔德姆和莫里斯(2000)的书中描述DSM III人格障碍的14个小插曲。参与者被邀请进行六次评分,包括每个小插曲中的每个人看起来有多幸福,以及在建立长期关系方面有多成功。14个小插曲中每个问题的效果大小从小到中等。这六个评级被纳入一个单一的社会调整量表,在这一衡量标准上,PD之间存在许多差异。依赖性帕金森病患者被认为在社交关系中最成功,而精神分裂症患者则被认为最不成功。使用三个更高阶聚类进行的类似分析显示出显著差异:聚类C紊乱的人被判断为比聚类A的人适应得更好。讨论了方法的局限性和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Relationships Research
Journal of Relationships Research Psychology-Social Psychology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This innovative journal provides researchers and practitioners with access to quality, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed articles covering the entire range of fields associated with personal, intimate, organizational and family, and social relationships, development, training and analysis of human relationship skills across the life-span. Originally an initiative of the Psychology of Relationships Interest Group of the Australian Psychological Society, the journal became independent within its first year with the intention of publishing papers from the full array of researchers of relationship. The journal features an experienced and eclectic international Editorial Board and is international in its reach. There is a special emphasis on contributions from Asia, including the subcontinent and Pacific regions but the journal welcomes papers from all other parts of the world.
期刊最新文献
Factor Structure and Convergent Validity of the Portuguese version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems – 32 A Longitudinal Test of Relational Turbulence Theory Physical Attraction Scale — Short Version: Cross-Cultural Validation Perceptions of Sex Offenders’ Partners: Associated with Perceptions of Offenders and Influenced by Attachment Changes and Challenges: Parenting Challenges in Iranian Mothers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1