Probabilistic analysis for the reinforced fill over void problem

IF 2.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geosynthetics International Pub Date : 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1680/jgein.23.00067
R. Bathurst, F. M. Naftchali
{"title":"Probabilistic analysis for the reinforced fill over void problem","authors":"R. Bathurst, F. M. Naftchali","doi":"10.1680/jgein.23.00067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analytical and numerical solutions for the problem of geosynthetic reinforced fills over a void have been the subject of investigation for the last four decades. A common feature of this prior work is that all methods have treated the analytical solutions as deterministic. While the treatment of some input parameters must be taken as deterministic, there are other parameters that have uncertainty. Furthermore, the underlying mechanistic models for load and resistance terms in the limit state equations for the reinforced fill over a void problem can be expected to have different accuracy. This paper revisits the problem of geosynthetic reinforced fills over voids from a probabilistic point of view for reinforcement tensile strain, tensile strength and geosynthetic stiffness limit states. Particular attention is paid to the method used to select the isochronous stiffness of the reinforcement and the associated uncertainty in the magnitude of that value. The paper demonstrates how the factor of safety from deterministic past practice can be linked quantitatively to reliability index used in contemporary probabilistic design. Finally, the paper demonstrates the advantage of using product-specific constant-load creep test results to maximise margins of safety for strength and stiffness limit states in both deterministic and probabilistic frameworks.","PeriodicalId":12616,"journal":{"name":"Geosynthetics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosynthetics International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.23.00067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analytical and numerical solutions for the problem of geosynthetic reinforced fills over a void have been the subject of investigation for the last four decades. A common feature of this prior work is that all methods have treated the analytical solutions as deterministic. While the treatment of some input parameters must be taken as deterministic, there are other parameters that have uncertainty. Furthermore, the underlying mechanistic models for load and resistance terms in the limit state equations for the reinforced fill over a void problem can be expected to have different accuracy. This paper revisits the problem of geosynthetic reinforced fills over voids from a probabilistic point of view for reinforcement tensile strain, tensile strength and geosynthetic stiffness limit states. Particular attention is paid to the method used to select the isochronous stiffness of the reinforcement and the associated uncertainty in the magnitude of that value. The paper demonstrates how the factor of safety from deterministic past practice can be linked quantitatively to reliability index used in contemporary probabilistic design. Finally, the paper demonstrates the advantage of using product-specific constant-load creep test results to maximise margins of safety for strength and stiffness limit states in both deterministic and probabilistic frameworks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加筋填空问题的概率分析
在过去的四十年里,土工合成材料加筋填充物问题的分析和数值解一直是研究的主题。这项先前工作的一个共同特点是,所有方法都将分析解视为确定性的。虽然某些输入参数的处理必须被视为确定性的,但还有其他参数具有不确定性。此外,在孔隙上加筋填土的极限状态方程中,荷载和阻力项的基本力学模型可能具有不同的精度。本文从钢筋拉伸应变、抗拉强度和土工合成材料刚度极限状态的概率角度,重新探讨了土工合成纤维填充空隙的问题。特别注意用于选择钢筋等时刚度的方法以及该值大小的相关不确定性。本文论证了如何将过去确定性实践中的安全系数与当代概率设计中使用的可靠性指标定量联系起来。最后,本文证明了在确定性和概率性框架中,使用特定产品的恒载蠕变试验结果来最大限度地提高强度和刚度极限状态的安全裕度的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geosynthetics International
Geosynthetics International ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: An online only, rapid publication journal, Geosynthetics International – an official journal of the International Geosynthetics Society (IGS) – publishes the best information on current geosynthetics technology in research, design innovation, new materials and construction practice. Topics covered The whole of geosynthetic materials (including natural fibre products) such as research, behaviour, performance analysis, testing, design, construction methods, case histories and field experience. Geosynthetics International is received by all members of the IGS as part of their membership, and is published in e-only format six times a year.
期刊最新文献
Geosynthetic MSE walls research and practice: past, present, and future (2023 IGS Bathurst Lecture) Investigation of the mechanical response of recovered geogrids under repeated loading Factors affecting the tensile strength of bituminous geomembrane seams Centrifuge modeling of levees with geocomposite chimney drain subjected to flooding Selection of long-term shear strength parameters for strain softening geosynthetic interfaces (2023 IGS Rowe Lecture)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1