Do Sustainability Disclosures Lead to Opportunistic Behaviour? Empirical Evidence from India

S. Sushanth Kumar, Poornima Mishra, Ashish Sharma
{"title":"Do Sustainability Disclosures Lead to Opportunistic Behaviour? Empirical Evidence from India","authors":"S. Sushanth Kumar, Poornima Mishra, Ashish Sharma","doi":"10.1177/00194662221138127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study empirically examines the bi-directional relationship between sustainability disclosures and earnings quality under mandatory sustainability disclosures regime for India, a developing country. It considers both the qualitative and quantitative measurements of sustainability disclosures. Earlier research only explored such relationships assuming a unidirectional approach, under voluntary sustainability disclosure setting with quantitative measurements of sustainability disclosures for developed countries. The study employs the generalised method of moments (GMM) approach on selected listed companies for the period 2013–2019. The result shows a negative bi-directional relationship between sustainability disclosures quality and earnings quality which also hold when tested with an alternate earnings quality measure. The result confirms that firms focusing on sustainability disclosures will also be manipulating earnings because of opportunistic perspective. Also, firms manage earnings to use sustainability disclosures as their cover to protect themselves. The study offers theoretical contribution by empirically corroborating the agency theory based managerial opportunism hypothesis. It extends and validates the managerial opportunism hypothesis in a novel context and under mandatory sustainability disclosures setting. The findings offer strong policy implications to Indian regulators and other stakeholders regarding the unintended consequence of mandatory sustainability disclosures. JEL Codes: Q50, Q56, M48","PeriodicalId":85705,"journal":{"name":"The Indian economic journal : the quarterly journal of the Indian Economic Association","volume":"71 1","pages":"845 - 863"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian economic journal : the quarterly journal of the Indian Economic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662221138127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study empirically examines the bi-directional relationship between sustainability disclosures and earnings quality under mandatory sustainability disclosures regime for India, a developing country. It considers both the qualitative and quantitative measurements of sustainability disclosures. Earlier research only explored such relationships assuming a unidirectional approach, under voluntary sustainability disclosure setting with quantitative measurements of sustainability disclosures for developed countries. The study employs the generalised method of moments (GMM) approach on selected listed companies for the period 2013–2019. The result shows a negative bi-directional relationship between sustainability disclosures quality and earnings quality which also hold when tested with an alternate earnings quality measure. The result confirms that firms focusing on sustainability disclosures will also be manipulating earnings because of opportunistic perspective. Also, firms manage earnings to use sustainability disclosures as their cover to protect themselves. The study offers theoretical contribution by empirically corroborating the agency theory based managerial opportunism hypothesis. It extends and validates the managerial opportunism hypothesis in a novel context and under mandatory sustainability disclosures setting. The findings offer strong policy implications to Indian regulators and other stakeholders regarding the unintended consequence of mandatory sustainability disclosures. JEL Codes: Q50, Q56, M48
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续性披露会导致机会主义行为吗?来自印度的经验证据
本研究实证检验了发展中国家印度在强制性可持续性披露制度下可持续性披露与盈余质量之间的双向关系。它考虑了可持续性披露的定性和定量衡量。早期的研究只探讨了这种关系,假设采用单向方法,在自愿可持续性披露的背景下,对发达国家的可持续性披露进行定量测量。本研究采用广义矩量法(GMM)对2013-2019年期间选定的上市公司进行了研究。结果表明,可持续性披露质量和收益质量之间存在负双向关系,当用替代收益质量指标进行测试时,这种关系也成立。这一结果证实,专注于可持续性披露的公司也将因为机会主义视角而操纵收益。此外,公司管理收益是为了利用可持续性披露作为保护自己的掩护。本研究通过实证验证了基于代理理论的管理机会主义假说,提供了理论贡献。它在一个新的背景下,在强制性可持续性披露的背景下扩展和验证了管理机会主义假说。这些发现为印度监管机构和其他利益相关者提供了强有力的政策启示,说明强制性可持续性披露的意外后果。JEL代码:Q50、Q56、M48
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changing Employment Patterns: An Analysis of Rural Labour Force in Punjab Firm Size and Productivity in the Informal Sector: Evidence from India Revisiting India’s Export Potential: Modern Gravity Model Approach What Drives Corporate Saving in India? The Nexus Between Information Asymmetry and Liquidity of Stock: Evidence from the Indian Market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1