{"title":"Supportive medications and interventions received by prostate cancer survivors: results from the PiCTure study","authors":"F. Drummond, A. Gavin, L. Sharp","doi":"10.12788/JCSO.0384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prostate cancer treatments are associated with various physical after-e ects, including urinary, sexual, and bowel symptoms.1 ese after-e ects can have an impact on survivors’ healthrelated quality of life (HRQoL).2 Pharmaceutical and surgical interventions are available to manage or ameliorate many of these after-e ects (eg, sildena\u0085l citrate taken during and after radiotherapy improves sexual function),3 and their receipt has a positive impact on HRQoL.4 However, studies of clinicians suggest that such interventions may not be used widely.5,6 Patientreported data on this topic is lacking. erefore, we investigated the use of supportive medications and interventions in this population-based study of prostate cancer survivors. Methods e PiCTure (Prostate Cancer Treatment, Your Experience) study methods have been described elsewhere.7 Briey, 6,559 prostate cancer survivors 2-15 years after diagnosis (diagnosed during January 1, 1995-March 31, 2010, and alive in November 2011), identi\u0085ed from population-based cancer registries in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, were invited to complete a postal survey. Information was sought on after-e ects (incontinence, impotence, gynaecomastia, hot ashes/sweats, bowel problems, depression) that had been experienced at any time after treatment. For each after-e ect, men were asked if they had received any medication or interventions to alleviate symptoms, and, if so, what they had received; examples of common interven-","PeriodicalId":75058,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of community and supportive oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of community and supportive oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/JCSO.0384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Prostate cancer treatments are associated with various physical after-e ects, including urinary, sexual, and bowel symptoms.1 ese after-e ects can have an impact on survivors’ healthrelated quality of life (HRQoL).2 Pharmaceutical and surgical interventions are available to manage or ameliorate many of these after-e ects (eg, sildena l citrate taken during and after radiotherapy improves sexual function),3 and their receipt has a positive impact on HRQoL.4 However, studies of clinicians suggest that such interventions may not be used widely.5,6 Patientreported data on this topic is lacking. erefore, we investigated the use of supportive medications and interventions in this population-based study of prostate cancer survivors. Methods e PiCTure (Prostate Cancer Treatment, Your Experience) study methods have been described elsewhere.7 Briey, 6,559 prostate cancer survivors 2-15 years after diagnosis (diagnosed during January 1, 1995-March 31, 2010, and alive in November 2011), identi ed from population-based cancer registries in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, were invited to complete a postal survey. Information was sought on after-e ects (incontinence, impotence, gynaecomastia, hot ashes/sweats, bowel problems, depression) that had been experienced at any time after treatment. For each after-e ect, men were asked if they had received any medication or interventions to alleviate symptoms, and, if so, what they had received; examples of common interven-