Outcome of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastroenterology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-03-07 DOI:10.1155/2022/4486241
Tae Young Park, J. Moon
{"title":"Outcome of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy","authors":"Tae Young Park, J. Moon","doi":"10.1155/2022/4486241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methods From May 2006 to January 2017, patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy, who received an EUS-guided trucut biopsy or an FNA biopsy, were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, endosonographic characteristics of LNs including size, shape, border, echotexture, and echogenicity, diagnostic yield, and adverse events between the trucut needle group and aspiration needle group were compared. Results A total of 69 patients (trucut group, n = 33 vs. aspiration group, n = 36) were identified. There were no significant differences in demographic data, indication for an EUS-guided biopsy, location of LNs, number of needle passes, and endosonographic features of LNs between the two groups. The sizes of LNs were larger in the trucut group than in the aspiration group (28.9 ± 14.0 mm vs. 21.1 ± 8.8 mm, P = 0.007). However, there was no significant difference in the ratio of LNs that were ≥10 mm in both groups. The overall accuracy of the EUS-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of malignant lesions was 79.7% (55/69). There were no significant differences in the histological diagnostic yield of malignant LNs between the two groups. There were no significant procedure-related adverse events in both groups. Conclusion The EUS-guided biopsy can be a useful method for histologic evaluation of mediastinal nodal lesions.","PeriodicalId":12597,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4486241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Methods From May 2006 to January 2017, patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy, who received an EUS-guided trucut biopsy or an FNA biopsy, were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, endosonographic characteristics of LNs including size, shape, border, echotexture, and echogenicity, diagnostic yield, and adverse events between the trucut needle group and aspiration needle group were compared. Results A total of 69 patients (trucut group, n = 33 vs. aspiration group, n = 36) were identified. There were no significant differences in demographic data, indication for an EUS-guided biopsy, location of LNs, number of needle passes, and endosonographic features of LNs between the two groups. The sizes of LNs were larger in the trucut group than in the aspiration group (28.9 ± 14.0 mm vs. 21.1 ± 8.8 mm, P = 0.007). However, there was no significant difference in the ratio of LNs that were ≥10 mm in both groups. The overall accuracy of the EUS-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of malignant lesions was 79.7% (55/69). There were no significant differences in the histological diagnostic yield of malignant LNs between the two groups. There were no significant procedure-related adverse events in both groups. Conclusion The EUS-guided biopsy can be a useful method for histologic evaluation of mediastinal nodal lesions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声内镜下纵隔淋巴结取样的结果
方法对2006年5月至2017年1月接受EUS引导下trucut活检或FNA活检的纵隔淋巴结病患者进行回顾性分析。比较trucut针组和抽吸针组之间的人口学数据、LNs的内窥镜检查特征,包括大小、形状、边界、回声纹理和回声、诊断率和不良事件。结果共鉴定出69例患者(trucut组,n=33,误吸组,n=36)。两组之间在人口统计学数据、EUS引导下活检的指征、淋巴结的位置、穿刺次数和淋巴结的内窥镜检查特征方面没有显著差异。trucut组的LNs尺寸大于抽吸组(28.9±14.0 mm与21.1±8.8 mm,P=0.007)。然而,≥10的LNs比率没有显著差异 mm。EUS引导的活检对恶性病变的诊断总体准确率为79.7%(55/69)。两组之间恶性淋巴结的组织学诊断率没有显著差异。两组患者均无明显的手术相关不良事件。结论超声引导下纵隔淋巴结活检可作为纵隔淋巴结病变组织学评价的一种有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Gastroenterology Research and Practice GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal which publishes original research articles, review articles and clinical studies based on all areas of gastroenterology, hepatology, pancreas and biliary, and related cancers. The journal welcomes submissions on the physiology, pathophysiology, etiology, diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal diseases. The aim of the journal is to provide cutting edge research related to the field of gastroenterology, as well as digestive diseases and disorders. Topics of interest include: Management of pancreatic diseases Third space endoscopy Endoscopic resection Therapeutic endoscopy Therapeutic endosonography.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic Efficacy of Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography in Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Liver Disease and Chronic Hepatitis B. Prevalence of Gastroparesis and the Impact of Metformin in Diabetic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Clinical Practice and Safety of Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Crohn's Disease-Related Strictures: A Nationwide Claim Database Analysis in Japan. Efficacy of Step-Down Therapy Using Vonoprazan for Symptomatic Mild Reflux Esophagitis. Beneficial Alterations of Intestinal Microbiota in Chronic Cholecystitis Patients Treated With NOTES Gallbladder-Preserving Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1