{"title":"Control of separation shock unsteadiness in an incident-shock-induced interaction","authors":"C. Manisankar, S. B. Verma","doi":"10.1007/s00193-023-01129-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Separation shock unsteadiness in an incident-shock-induced interaction with and without control is evaluated in a Mach 2.05 flow using a <span>\\(14^{\\circ }\\)</span> shock generator. An array of mechanical vortex generators (MVGs) in the form of rectangular vanes (MVG1), ramp vanes (MVG2), and a delta ramp (MVG3) is placed <span>\\(14\\delta \\)</span> upstream of the interaction region (<span>\\(\\delta =5.2\\,{\\textrm{mm}}\\)</span> being the local boundary layer thickness at the interaction). Among all the devices tested, MVG1 shows a maximum reduction of the separation length (about 28% relative to the no-control case). The spectra at separation also show a shift in the dominant frequency from 220 Hz without control to 539 Hz with MVG1. Interestingly, the peak rms (root mean square) value is seen to occur with control at much larger intermittency values (<span>\\(\\upgamma _{\\upsigma ,{\\textrm{max}}}=0.92\\)</span> for MVG1) in contrast to the no-control case in which it occurs at <span>\\(\\upgamma _{\\upsigma ,{\\textrm{max}}}=0.5\\)</span> as reported so far. The auto-correlation at the separation and reattachment shock locations indicates the presence of relatively small-scale structures with control as compared to the case without control. Out of all the control cases tested, MVG1 exhibits better separation control with a relatively lower unsteadiness level.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":775,"journal":{"name":"Shock Waves","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock Waves","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00193-023-01129-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Separation shock unsteadiness in an incident-shock-induced interaction with and without control is evaluated in a Mach 2.05 flow using a \(14^{\circ }\) shock generator. An array of mechanical vortex generators (MVGs) in the form of rectangular vanes (MVG1), ramp vanes (MVG2), and a delta ramp (MVG3) is placed \(14\delta \) upstream of the interaction region (\(\delta =5.2\,{\textrm{mm}}\) being the local boundary layer thickness at the interaction). Among all the devices tested, MVG1 shows a maximum reduction of the separation length (about 28% relative to the no-control case). The spectra at separation also show a shift in the dominant frequency from 220 Hz without control to 539 Hz with MVG1. Interestingly, the peak rms (root mean square) value is seen to occur with control at much larger intermittency values (\(\upgamma _{\upsigma ,{\textrm{max}}}=0.92\) for MVG1) in contrast to the no-control case in which it occurs at \(\upgamma _{\upsigma ,{\textrm{max}}}=0.5\) as reported so far. The auto-correlation at the separation and reattachment shock locations indicates the presence of relatively small-scale structures with control as compared to the case without control. Out of all the control cases tested, MVG1 exhibits better separation control with a relatively lower unsteadiness level.
在马赫数为2.05的流动中,利用\(14^{\circ }\)激波发生器对有控制和无控制的入射激波相互作用中的分离激波非定常进行了评估。一组机械涡发生器(mvg)以矩形叶片(MVG1)、斜坡叶片(MVG2)和三角洲斜坡(MVG3)的形式放置在相互作用区域的上游\(14\delta \) (\(\delta =5.2\,{\textrm{mm}}\)为相互作用处的局部边界层厚度)。在所有测试的器件中,MVG1显示出最大的分离长度减少(约28% relative to the no-control case). The spectra at separation also show a shift in the dominant frequency from 220 Hz without control to 539 Hz with MVG1. Interestingly, the peak rms (root mean square) value is seen to occur with control at much larger intermittency values (\(\upgamma _{\upsigma ,{\textrm{max}}}=0.92\) for MVG1) in contrast to the no-control case in which it occurs at \(\upgamma _{\upsigma ,{\textrm{max}}}=0.5\) as reported so far. The auto-correlation at the separation and reattachment shock locations indicates the presence of relatively small-scale structures with control as compared to the case without control. Out of all the control cases tested, MVG1 exhibits better separation control with a relatively lower unsteadiness level.
期刊介绍:
Shock Waves provides a forum for presenting and discussing new results in all fields where shock and detonation phenomena play a role. The journal addresses physicists, engineers and applied mathematicians working on theoretical, experimental or numerical issues, including diagnostics and flow visualization.
The research fields considered include, but are not limited to, aero- and gas dynamics, acoustics, physical chemistry, condensed matter and plasmas, with applications encompassing materials sciences, space sciences, geosciences, life sciences and medicine.
Of particular interest are contributions which provide insights into fundamental aspects of the techniques that are relevant to more than one specific research community.
The journal publishes scholarly research papers, invited review articles and short notes, as well as comments on papers already published in this journal. Occasionally concise meeting reports of interest to the Shock Waves community are published.