{"title":"The Glory of Death? German Memorials of the Great War in the North-Western Czech Borderlands after 1945","authors":"Karolina Ćwiek-Rogalska","doi":"10.14712/23363231.2019.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"War memorials (in German, Kriegerdenkmaler) were built after World War I in almost every village and town in Czechoslovakia that had a German population, to commemorate those who had been killed in the war. After 1945, these memorials were either destroyed or recycled. The author shows how the new Czech inhabitants who replaced the traditional population of the borderlands coped with these memorials. Focusing her research on the Cheb and Marianske Lazně regions, she considers the destruction of the monuments to be an example of managing a “dissonant heritage.” Some of the monuments were demolished altogether; others were re-used for new purposes as parts of new objects. Applying Reinhart Koselleck’s theory that war memorials serve the living more than they do the dead, by creating communal attitudes toward common social issues, the author analyzes patterns in the erection of German memorials of the Great War in the Czech lands. She also refers to Bernhard Bottcher’s analysis of German war memorials in Czechoslovakia, which regards them as monuments commemorating a country which had ceased to exist. Her main thesis is that the “new life” given to war memorials after 1945 is connected to a new and different perspective among Czechs on World War I, to their hostile attitude towards the German heritage of Czechoslovakia, and to a different perception of memorials inherited from the past. Keywords: World War I; war memorials; dissonant heritage; Czechoslovakia; German minority DOI: 10.14712/23363231.2019.10 © 2019 The Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License , which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.","PeriodicalId":33551,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23363231.2019.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
死亡的荣耀?1945年后捷克西北边境的德国一战纪念馆
战争纪念馆(德语:Kriegerdenkmaler)是在第一次世界大战后在捷克斯洛伐克几乎每个有德国人的村庄和城镇建造的,以纪念在战争中丧生的人。1945年后,这些纪念馆要么被销毁,要么被回收。作者展示了取代边境地区传统人口的新捷克居民是如何应对这些纪念馆的。她将研究重点放在切布和马里亚斯克·拉兹涅地区,认为对纪念碑的破坏是管理“不和谐遗产”的一个例子;另一些则作为新对象的一部分被重新用于新的目的。作者运用Reinhart Koselleck的理论,即战争纪念馆为生者服务多于为死者服务,通过创造对共同社会问题的共同态度,分析了德国在捷克土地上建立二战纪念馆的模式。她还提到了伯恩哈德·博彻对德国在捷克斯洛伐克的战争纪念碑的分析,认为这些纪念碑是纪念一个已经不复存在的国家的纪念碑。她的主要论点是,1945年后赋予战争纪念馆的“新生命”与捷克人对第一次世界大战的新的、不同的看法有关,与他们对捷克斯洛伐克德国遗产的敌对态度有关,也与他们对从过去继承的纪念馆的不同看法有关。关键词:第一次世界大战;战争纪念馆;不和谐遗产;捷克斯洛伐克;德国少数民族DOI:10.14712/223363231.2019.10©2019作者。这是一篇根据知识共享署名非商业性非衍生产品许可证条款分发的开放获取文章,该许可证允许在任何媒体上使用、分发和复制,前提是原始作者和来源可信,使用是非商业性的,并且不进行任何修改或改编。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。