Locoregional Anesthesia in a Resource-Limited Country: Can Lidocaine 1.5% with Adrenaline Be an Alternative to Ropivacaine 0.5% for Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Blocks?

Pub Date : 2020-11-06 DOI:10.4236/ojanes.2020.1011034
J. Donamou, M. Camara, A. Bangoura, A. Traoré, M. Bah
{"title":"Locoregional Anesthesia in a Resource-Limited Country: Can Lidocaine 1.5% with Adrenaline Be an Alternative to Ropivacaine 0.5% for Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Blocks?","authors":"J. Donamou, M. Camara, A. Bangoura, A. Traoré, M. Bah","doi":"10.4236/ojanes.2020.1011034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The ultrasound-guided axillary block is a block commonly used in upper limb surgery. Several local anaesthetics can be used to obtain an effective block. These include ropivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 1.5% with adrenaline. Objective: To evaluate lidocaine 1.5% with adrenaline as an alternative to ropivacaine 0.5% for ultrasound-guided axillary blocks. Methodology: This was a 6-month prospective and randomized study (July 15, 2019 to January 15, 2020) conducted in the Department of Anesthesia at Ignace Deen National Hospital in Conakry, Guinea. Results: A total of 38 patients were enrolled: 19 in each group. The mean age was 45.8 ± 16.9 years in the lidocaine with adrenaline group compared to 43.9 ± 20 years in the ropivacaine group. The mean onset time in the lidocaine group was 6.8 ± 2.1 minutes compared to 8.3 ± 2.4 minutes in the ropivacaine group (p = 0.04). The mean duration of axillary block was 233.3 ± 57.5 minutes in the lidocaine group versus 260.4 ± 74 minutes in the ropivacaine group (p = 0.21). The performance was identical in both groups with 89.5% of the effective blocks in the lidocaine group and in the ropivacaine group (p = 1). The cost of consumables for the ropivacaine group was 60 euros compared to 15 euros for the lidocaine group. Conclusion: Lidocaine 1.5% with adrenaline is a good alternative to ropivacaine 0.5% for ultrasound-guided axillary blocks in resource-limited countries.","PeriodicalId":90667,"journal":{"name":"","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2020.1011034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The ultrasound-guided axillary block is a block commonly used in upper limb surgery. Several local anaesthetics can be used to obtain an effective block. These include ropivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 1.5% with adrenaline. Objective: To evaluate lidocaine 1.5% with adrenaline as an alternative to ropivacaine 0.5% for ultrasound-guided axillary blocks. Methodology: This was a 6-month prospective and randomized study (July 15, 2019 to January 15, 2020) conducted in the Department of Anesthesia at Ignace Deen National Hospital in Conakry, Guinea. Results: A total of 38 patients were enrolled: 19 in each group. The mean age was 45.8 ± 16.9 years in the lidocaine with adrenaline group compared to 43.9 ± 20 years in the ropivacaine group. The mean onset time in the lidocaine group was 6.8 ± 2.1 minutes compared to 8.3 ± 2.4 minutes in the ropivacaine group (p = 0.04). The mean duration of axillary block was 233.3 ± 57.5 minutes in the lidocaine group versus 260.4 ± 74 minutes in the ropivacaine group (p = 0.21). The performance was identical in both groups with 89.5% of the effective blocks in the lidocaine group and in the ropivacaine group (p = 1). The cost of consumables for the ropivacaine group was 60 euros compared to 15 euros for the lidocaine group. Conclusion: Lidocaine 1.5% with adrenaline is a good alternative to ropivacaine 0.5% for ultrasound-guided axillary blocks in resource-limited countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资源有限国家的区域麻醉:1.5%的利多卡因和肾上腺素能替代0.5%的罗哌卡因用于超声引导的腋窝阻滞吗?
背景:超声引导下腋窝阻滞是上肢手术中常用的一种阻滞方法。可以使用几种局部麻醉剂来获得有效的阻滞。其中包括0.5%的罗哌卡因和1.5%的利多卡因以及肾上腺素。目的:评价1.5%利多卡因和肾上腺素替代0.5%罗哌卡因用于超声引导下腋窝阻滞的疗效。方法:这是一项为期6个月的前瞻性随机研究(2019年7月15日至2020年1月15日),在几内亚科纳克里Ignace Deen国立医院麻醉科进行。结果:共有38名患者入选:每组19名。利多卡因+肾上腺素组的平均年龄为45.8±16.9岁,而罗哌卡因组为43.9±20岁。利多卡因组的平均起效时间为6.8±2.1分钟,而罗哌卡因组为8.3±2.4分钟(p=0.04)。利多卡因组腋窝阻滞的平均持续时间为233.3±57.5分钟,而罗哌卡因组则为260.4±74分钟(p=0.021)。两组的效果相同,利多卡因组和罗哌卡因组(p=1)。罗哌卡因组的耗材成本为60欧元,而利多卡因组为15欧元。结论:在资源有限的国家,1.5%利多卡因和肾上腺素是0.5%罗哌卡因的良好替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1