Relations between Students’ Study Approaches, Perceptions of the Learning Environment, and Academic Achievement in Flipped Classroom Learning: Evidence from Self-Reported and Process Data

IF 4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Educational Computing Research Pub Date : 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1177/07356331231162823
Feifei Han
{"title":"Relations between Students’ Study Approaches, Perceptions of the Learning Environment, and Academic Achievement in Flipped Classroom Learning: Evidence from Self-Reported and Process Data","authors":"Feifei Han","doi":"10.1177/07356331231162823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the extent to which relations between students’ perceptions of the learning environment, academic achievement, and study approaches measured by both self-reported and process data were consistent amongst 323 engineering students in a flipped classroom course. A hierarchical cluster analysis on four self-reported scales identified deep and surface study approaches. Students reporting deep approaches obtained significantly better marks than those reporting surface approaches. An agglomerative sequence clustering on sequences of students’ online interactions found four observed study approaches: two focused on content and two focused on assessment. Students adopting content-focused approaches performed significantly better than those employing assessment-focused ones. Two cross-tabulations revealed consistency of relational patterns between perceptions of the learning environment and study approaches by self-reported or process data. Amongst students with better perceptions, a significantly higher proportion of them reported deep approaches than surface approaches. Amongst students using content-focused approaches, significantly higher proportions of them held positive perceptions than negative perceptions. The study results suggest to teachers that fostering a better learning environment, helping students understand how online and in-person components are integrated, and equipping them with knowledge and principles of flipped classroom learning would be useful to enhance students’ learning experiences in flipped classroom courses.","PeriodicalId":47865,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Computing Research","volume":"61 1","pages":"1252 - 1274"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Computing Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231162823","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study examined the extent to which relations between students’ perceptions of the learning environment, academic achievement, and study approaches measured by both self-reported and process data were consistent amongst 323 engineering students in a flipped classroom course. A hierarchical cluster analysis on four self-reported scales identified deep and surface study approaches. Students reporting deep approaches obtained significantly better marks than those reporting surface approaches. An agglomerative sequence clustering on sequences of students’ online interactions found four observed study approaches: two focused on content and two focused on assessment. Students adopting content-focused approaches performed significantly better than those employing assessment-focused ones. Two cross-tabulations revealed consistency of relational patterns between perceptions of the learning environment and study approaches by self-reported or process data. Amongst students with better perceptions, a significantly higher proportion of them reported deep approaches than surface approaches. Amongst students using content-focused approaches, significantly higher proportions of them held positive perceptions than negative perceptions. The study results suggest to teachers that fostering a better learning environment, helping students understand how online and in-person components are integrated, and equipping them with knowledge and principles of flipped classroom learning would be useful to enhance students’ learning experiences in flipped classroom courses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
翻转课堂中学生学习方法、学习环境感知与学业成绩之间的关系:来自自我报告和过程数据的证据
本研究调查了323名工程系学生在翻转课堂课程中对学习环境、学业成绩和学习方法的看法之间的关系,这些关系通过自我报告和过程数据来衡量。对四个自我报告量表的层次聚类分析确定了深度和表面研究方法。报告深度方法的学生比报告表面方法的学生获得了更好的分数。对学生在线互动序列的聚集序列聚类发现了四种观察到的研究方法:两种侧重于内容,两种侧重评估。采用以内容为中心的方法的学生表现明显好于采用以评估为中心的方式的学生。两个交叉表显示,通过自我报告或处理数据,对学习环境的感知和学习方法之间的关系模式是一致的。在认知能力更好的学生中,他们中有更高比例的人报告了深度方法而不是表面方法。在使用以内容为中心的方法的学生中,持积极看法的比例明显高于持消极看法的比例。研究结果向教师表明,营造一个更好的学习环境,帮助学生了解在线和面对面的组成部分是如何整合的,并为他们提供翻转课堂学习的知识和原则,将有助于增强学生在翻转课堂课程中的学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational Computing Research
Journal of Educational Computing Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The goal of this Journal is to provide an international scholarly publication forum for peer-reviewed interdisciplinary research into the applications, effects, and implications of computer-based education. The Journal features articles useful for practitioners and theorists alike. The terms "education" and "computing" are viewed broadly. “Education” refers to the use of computer-based technologies at all levels of the formal education system, business and industry, home-schooling, lifelong learning, and unintentional learning environments. “Computing” refers to all forms of computer applications and innovations - both hardware and software. For example, this could range from mobile and ubiquitous computing to immersive 3D simulations and games to computing-enhanced virtual learning environments.
期刊最新文献
Promoting Letter-Naming and Initial-Phoneme Detection Abilities Among Preschoolers at Risk for Specific Learning Disorder Using Technological Intervention With Two Types of Mats: With and Without Target Letter Forms Investigating the Effects of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Language Learning Strategies on Cognitive Load and Learning Outcomes: A Comparative Study Curiosity, Interest, and Engagement: Unpacking Their Roles in Students’ Learning within a Virtual Game Environment Does Generative Artificial Intelligence Improve the Academic Achievement of College Students? A Meta-Analysis Designing an Inclusive Artificial Intelligence (AI) Curriculum for Elementary Students to Address Gender Differences With Collaborative and Tangible Approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1