Simulation in Nursing Education: Advancements in Regulation, 2014–2022

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Regulation Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00086-8
Richard Smiley MS, MA, Brendan Martin PhD
{"title":"Simulation in Nursing Education: Advancements in Regulation, 2014–2022","authors":"Richard Smiley MS, MA,&nbsp;Brendan Martin PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00086-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of simulation-based clinical experiences in prelicensure nursing education has increased dramatically over the past 2 decades. This trend accelerated after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To quantify advancements in the regulation of simulation use in nursing education since the publication of the National Simulation Study and its accompanying guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This cohort study included 61 of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing’s U.S.-based member and associate member jurisdictions. For each included jurisdiction, explicit simulation regulation information regarding either </span>registered nurse<span> (RN) or licensed practical nurse/licensed vocational nurse (LPN/LVN) programs was obtained in 2014. Comparisons were made between 2014 and 2022 nursing simulation regulations. Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess the significance of the observed changes.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The number of jurisdictions with specific regulations regarding simulation use in prelicensure RN programs doubled from 21 in 2014 to 41 in 2022. Additionally, the number of nursing regulatory bodies (NRBs) that allowed a maximum substitution of up to 50% simulated clinical hours rose from 1 to 23 over the same time frame. Similarly, specific regulations regarding simulation use in LPN/LVN programs rose from 20 programs in 2014 to 36 in 2022. As with RN programs, the number of NRBs that permit a maximum of up to 50% simulation substitution for LPN/LVN programs rose from 0 to 22 during the 8-year period.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The impact of the guidelines that emerged from the National Simulation Study is evident. The proactive efforts of NRBs to adopt evidence-based best practices on simulation regulation before and shortly after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic provided appropriate flexibility for prelicensure RN programs to respond to the global health crisis efficiently and safely.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"14 2","pages":"Pages 5-9"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825623000868","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

The use of simulation-based clinical experiences in prelicensure nursing education has increased dramatically over the past 2 decades. This trend accelerated after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

Purpose

To quantify advancements in the regulation of simulation use in nursing education since the publication of the National Simulation Study and its accompanying guidelines.

Methods

This cohort study included 61 of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing’s U.S.-based member and associate member jurisdictions. For each included jurisdiction, explicit simulation regulation information regarding either registered nurse (RN) or licensed practical nurse/licensed vocational nurse (LPN/LVN) programs was obtained in 2014. Comparisons were made between 2014 and 2022 nursing simulation regulations. Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess the significance of the observed changes.

Results

The number of jurisdictions with specific regulations regarding simulation use in prelicensure RN programs doubled from 21 in 2014 to 41 in 2022. Additionally, the number of nursing regulatory bodies (NRBs) that allowed a maximum substitution of up to 50% simulated clinical hours rose from 1 to 23 over the same time frame. Similarly, specific regulations regarding simulation use in LPN/LVN programs rose from 20 programs in 2014 to 36 in 2022. As with RN programs, the number of NRBs that permit a maximum of up to 50% simulation substitution for LPN/LVN programs rose from 0 to 22 during the 8-year period.

Conclusion

The impact of the guidelines that emerged from the National Simulation Study is evident. The proactive efforts of NRBs to adopt evidence-based best practices on simulation regulation before and shortly after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic provided appropriate flexibility for prelicensure RN programs to respond to the global health crisis efficiently and safely.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理教育模拟:法规进展,2014-2022
在过去的20年里,在护理资格预审教育中,基于模拟的临床经验的使用急剧增加。这一趋势在美国COVID-19大流行爆发后加速了。目的量化自国家模拟研究及其附带指南出版以来在护理教育中使用模拟的监管进展。方法:本队列研究包括61个国家护理委员会的美国会员和准会员辖区。对于每个纳入的司法管辖区,2014年获得了关于注册护士(RN)或执业护士/执业护士(LPN/LVN)计划的明确模拟法规信息。比较2014年和2022年护理模拟法规。使用广义估计方程模型来评估观察到的变化的显著性。结果对注册护士执照前项目中模拟使用有具体规定的司法管辖区数量从2014年的21个增加到2022年的41个。此外,在同一时间段内,允许最多替代50%模拟临床时数的护理监管机构(nrb)的数量从1个增加到23个。同样,关于LPN/LVN项目中模拟使用的具体规定从2014年的20个项目增加到2022年的36个。与RN项目一样,在8年的时间里,允许LPN/LVN项目模拟替代率高达50%的nrb数量从0个增加到22个。结论:国家模拟研究产生的指导方针的影响是显而易见的。在COVID-19大流行爆发之前和之后不久,nrb积极采取基于证据的模拟监管最佳实践,为注册护士执照前计划提供了适当的灵活性,以有效和安全地应对全球卫生危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
50
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR), the official journal of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®), is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, academic and professional journal. It publishes scholarly articles that advance the science of nursing regulation, promote the mission and vision of NCSBN, and enhance communication and collaboration among nurse regulators, educators, practitioners, and the scientific community. The journal supports evidence-based regulation, addresses issues related to patient safety, and highlights current nursing regulatory issues, programs, and projects in both the United States and the international community. In publishing JNR, NCSBN''s goal is to develop and share knowledge related to nursing and other healthcare regulation across continents and to promote a greater awareness of regulatory issues among all nurses.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Can Multistate Licensure Compacts Help Address Military Retention Issues? A Banner Year for JNR Nurses’ Perceptions of the Professional and Personal Impacts of Cannabis Use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1