Examining the Perception and Use of Open Crime Data from a Citizen Perspective

IF 0.7 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Chinese Public Administration Review Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.22140/cpar.v10i1.192
M. Hung, W. Hsieh
{"title":"Examining the Perception and Use of Open Crime Data from a Citizen Perspective","authors":"M. Hung, W. Hsieh","doi":"10.22140/cpar.v10i1.192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The disclosure of public information is an important issue in government practice. Freely used and accessible data produced by government bodies presumably encourages citizen participation and makes government more transparent and accountable. However, there is limited evidence that citizens would take advantage of open data and on what drives that usagee. This study expands the technology acceptance model to take into account citizens’ perception of open data's potential societal risks as well as potential advantages to society and the advantages of delivering positive social outcomes. The analysis of results from of an online survey conducted in Taiwan in May 2017 confirms that a majority of respondents agree that open crime data has advantages compared with aggregate-level statistical data, while risks involved in the adoption of open crime data is are indeed a concern for a majority of respondents. Both help to explain citizens’ intentions of using to use open crime data. Citizens’ perception of usefulness is positively related to their intention to use open data. However, perceived ease of use of open crime data is not significantly associated with the intention to use open crime data directly. Future research should consider other ways to reach citizens who do not use the internet regularly. A better understanding of citizens’ responses to open data helps government design continued improvements to open data.","PeriodicalId":41625,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Public Administration Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Public Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22140/cpar.v10i1.192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The disclosure of public information is an important issue in government practice. Freely used and accessible data produced by government bodies presumably encourages citizen participation and makes government more transparent and accountable. However, there is limited evidence that citizens would take advantage of open data and on what drives that usagee. This study expands the technology acceptance model to take into account citizens’ perception of open data's potential societal risks as well as potential advantages to society and the advantages of delivering positive social outcomes. The analysis of results from of an online survey conducted in Taiwan in May 2017 confirms that a majority of respondents agree that open crime data has advantages compared with aggregate-level statistical data, while risks involved in the adoption of open crime data is are indeed a concern for a majority of respondents. Both help to explain citizens’ intentions of using to use open crime data. Citizens’ perception of usefulness is positively related to their intention to use open data. However, perceived ease of use of open crime data is not significantly associated with the intention to use open crime data directly. Future research should consider other ways to reach citizens who do not use the internet regularly. A better understanding of citizens’ responses to open data helps government design continued improvements to open data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从公民视角审视公开犯罪数据的感知和使用
公共信息公开是政府实践中的一个重要问题。政府机构提供的免费使用和可访问的数据可能会鼓励公民参与,并使政府更加透明和负责。然而,有有限的证据表明,公民会利用开放数据以及是什么驱动了usagee。这项研究扩展了技术接受模型,以考虑公民对开放数据潜在社会风险的感知,以及对社会的潜在优势和提供积极社会成果的优势。2017年5月在台湾进行的一项在线调查的结果分析证实,大多数受访者认为,与聚合级统计数据相比,公开犯罪数据具有优势,而采用公开犯罪数据所涉及的风险确实是大多数受访者关注的问题。两者都有助于解释公民使用公开犯罪数据的意图。公民对有用性的感知与他们使用开放数据的意图呈正相关。然而,对公开犯罪数据易用性的感知与直接使用公开犯罪数据的意图没有显著关联。未来的研究应该考虑其他方式来接触那些不经常使用互联网的公民。更好地了解公民对开放数据的反应有助于政府设计持续改进开放数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Public Administration Review
Chinese Public Administration Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
The impact of perceived walking environment on social support for older adults Governance capacity, social justice, social security, and institutionalized political participation in China: A moderated mediation model The regional integration transition of China’s immigration policy: The case of Yiwu Targeting performance of Dibao program in China: An empirical study based on the 2020 China Family Panel Studies Book Review: Ying Xiong, Zhexue yu gonggong xingzheng [Philosophy and public administration: An introduction]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1