Women’s Self-Employment as a Developmental Strategy: The Dual Constraints of Care Work and Aggregate Demand

IF 3.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Feminist Economics Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/13545701.2022.2044497
R. Vasudevan, S. Raghavendra
{"title":"Women’s Self-Employment as a Developmental Strategy: The Dual Constraints of Care Work and Aggregate Demand","authors":"R. Vasudevan, S. Raghavendra","doi":"10.1080/13545701.2022.2044497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The promotion of self-employment through financial inclusion initiatives has been adopted as a means of harnessing the entrepreneurial and productive capacities of women within the neoliberal developmental policy framework. This study presents a simple analytical model in the Post-Keynesian tradition to investigate the linkages between self-employment, aggregate demand, and unpaid care work by developing a two-sector model. It shows that a developmental strategy based on fostering women’s self-employment is constrained, on the one hand, by the macroeconomic conditions driving aggregate demand and, on the other, by the trade-off between the time allocation between unpaid care and paid work that the gendered division of care work responsibilities imposes on the self-employed woman worker. The promotion of self-employment cannot serve as a viable development strategy without policies that directly boost aggregate demand and at the same time relieve the burden of care responsibilities on women through public investment and social provision of care. HIGHLIGHTS Self-employment is too often uncritically prescribed as a vehicle for improving women’s livelihoods. Increased self-employment creates competing claims on women’s time between paid work and unpaid care. Women’s self-employment perpetuates gendered asymmetries of care responsibilities within the household. Macroeconomic demand conditions constrain the potential for women’s self-employment to increase livelihoods and support development. Financial inclusion policies alone have limited scope in sustaining women’s self-employment.","PeriodicalId":47715,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Economics","volume":"28 1","pages":"56 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2022.2044497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The promotion of self-employment through financial inclusion initiatives has been adopted as a means of harnessing the entrepreneurial and productive capacities of women within the neoliberal developmental policy framework. This study presents a simple analytical model in the Post-Keynesian tradition to investigate the linkages between self-employment, aggregate demand, and unpaid care work by developing a two-sector model. It shows that a developmental strategy based on fostering women’s self-employment is constrained, on the one hand, by the macroeconomic conditions driving aggregate demand and, on the other, by the trade-off between the time allocation between unpaid care and paid work that the gendered division of care work responsibilities imposes on the self-employed woman worker. The promotion of self-employment cannot serve as a viable development strategy without policies that directly boost aggregate demand and at the same time relieve the burden of care responsibilities on women through public investment and social provision of care. HIGHLIGHTS Self-employment is too often uncritically prescribed as a vehicle for improving women’s livelihoods. Increased self-employment creates competing claims on women’s time between paid work and unpaid care. Women’s self-employment perpetuates gendered asymmetries of care responsibilities within the household. Macroeconomic demand conditions constrain the potential for women’s self-employment to increase livelihoods and support development. Financial inclusion policies alone have limited scope in sustaining women’s self-employment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女自主就业作为一种发展战略:护理工作和总需求的双重制约
通过金融包容性举措促进自营职业已被采纳为在新自由主义发展政策框架内利用妇女创业和生产能力的一种手段。本研究提出了后凯恩斯主义传统中的一个简单分析模型,通过开发两个部门模型来调查自营职业、总需求和无偿护理工作之间的联系。它表明,一方面,基于促进妇女自营职业的发展战略受到推动总需求的宏观经济条件的制约,另一方面,由于照顾工作责任的性别划分强加给自营职业女工的无偿照顾和有偿工作之间的时间分配的权衡。如果没有直接促进总需求、同时通过公共投资和社会护理减轻妇女护理责任的政策,促进自营职业就不能成为一项可行的发展战略。亮点自营职业往往被不加批判地规定为改善妇女生计的工具。自营职业的增加在有偿工作和无偿护理之间对妇女的时间提出了相互竞争的要求。妇女的自营职业使家庭中照顾责任的性别不对称现象长期存在。宏观经济需求条件限制了妇女自营职业增加生计和支持发展的潜力。仅金融包容性政策在维持妇女自营职业方面的作用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Economics
Feminist Economics Multiple-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Feminist Economics is a peer-reviewed journal that provides an open forum for dialogue and debate about feminist economic perspectives. By opening new areas of economic inquiry, welcoming diverse voices, and encouraging critical exchanges, the journal enlarges and enriches economic discourse. The goal of Feminist Economics is not just to develop more illuminating theories but to improve the conditions of living for all children, women, and men. Feminist Economics: -Advances feminist inquiry into economic issues affecting the lives of children, women, and men -Examines the relationship between gender and power in the economy and the construction and legitimization of economic knowledge -Extends feminist theoretical, historical, and methodological contributions to economics and the economy -Offers feminist insights into the underlying constructs of the economics discipline and into the historical, political, and cultural context of economic knowledge -Provides a feminist rethinking of theory and policy in diverse fields, including those not directly related to gender -Stimulates discussions among diverse scholars worldwide and from a broad spectrum of intellectual traditions, welcoming cross-disciplinary and cross-country perspectives, especially from countries in the South
期刊最新文献
Dispossession after War: A Feminist Political Economy Perspective Analysis of Seasonal Time Poverty and Aspirations in the Upper East Region of Ghana The Value of Work: The Gendered Outcomes of Organizational Wage Reforms Feminist Ideologies at Work: Culture, Collectivism, and Entrepreneurship among Disadvantaged Women in India Women’s Colleges and Economics Major Choice: Evidence from Wellesley College Applicants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1